{"id":155784,"date":"2017-09-12T09:13:06","date_gmt":"2017-09-12T03:43:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=155784"},"modified":"2017-09-22T16:27:04","modified_gmt":"2017-09-22T10:57:04","slug":"strict-proof-of-marriage-not-necessary-for-the-purpose-of-s-125-crpc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/12\/strict-proof-of-marriage-not-necessary-for-the-purpose-of-s-125-crpc\/","title":{"rendered":"Strict proof of marriage not necessary for the purpose of S. 125 CrPC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Gauhati High Court:<\/strong> The Court was recently addressing a criminal revision petition against an order of the Additional Sessions Judge setting aside the order of the lower court to grant maintenance to petitioner under Section 125 CrPC. The petitioner told the Court that she married the respondent by executing a registered agreement at Guwahati, and, after the agreement was executed, he had put vermilion on her forehead accepting her as his wife in presence of village people and thereafter, stayed in his house for four days.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">However, she had also alleged that she was tortured by her in-laws and kicked out from the house after 4 days with a warning from brother and sister of respondent to never come back. On the other hand, the respondent had outrightly denied the taking place of marriage claiming that the petitioner is not his wife and thus, not entitled to any maintenance.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the petitioner placed his reliance upon Savitaben Somabhai Bhatiya v. State of Gujarat,\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForDocumentLink\/BLHp2vL4\">(2005) 3 SCC 636 <\/a>in which the Apex Court had held that the execution of the marriage agreement and putting vermilion on the forehead of the petitioner by the respondent, the marriage procedure was followed and no further proof was required to file a claim under Section 125 CrPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">On hearing both the parties, Hitesh Kumar Sarma, J. observed that the trial court appears to have thoroughly gone through the facts and evidences in the case. The Court took note of the fact that the respondent himself as witness examined by the trial court admitted the execution of the marriage agreement between him and the present petitioner. The Court came to the conclusion that in a proceeding under Section 125 CrPC, as held by the Supreme Court, strict proof of marriage is not necessary and accordingly, allowed the revision petition. [Sabita Deka v. Babul Deka,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForDocumentLink\/Dp1OR8L9\"> 2017 SCC OnLine Gau 714<\/a>, decided on 04.09.2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gauhati High Court: The Court was recently addressing a criminal revision petition against an order of the Additional Sessions Judge setting aside <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[20711,22554],"class_list":["post-155784","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-s-125-crpc","tag-strict-proof-of-marriage"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Strict proof of marriage not necessary for the purpose of S. 125 CrPC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/12\/strict-proof-of-marriage-not-necessary-for-the-purpose-of-s-125-crpc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Strict proof of marriage not necessary for the purpose of S. 125 CrPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Gauhati High Court: The Court was recently addressing a criminal revision petition against an order of the Additional Sessions Judge setting aside\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/12\/strict-proof-of-marriage-not-necessary-for-the-purpose-of-s-125-crpc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-09-12T03:43:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-22T10:57:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Gauhati-HC.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/09\\\/12\\\/strict-proof-of-marriage-not-necessary-for-the-purpose-of-s-125-crpc\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/09\\\/12\\\/strict-proof-of-marriage-not-necessary-for-the-purpose-of-s-125-crpc\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Saba\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"headline\":\"Strict proof of marriage not necessary for the purpose of S. 125 CrPC\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-09-12T03:43:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-22T10:57:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/09\\\/12\\\/strict-proof-of-marriage-not-necessary-for-the-purpose-of-s-125-crpc\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":319,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"S. 125 CrPC\",\"Strict proof of marriage\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/09\\\/12\\\/strict-proof-of-marriage-not-necessary-for-the-purpose-of-s-125-crpc\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/09\\\/12\\\/strict-proof-of-marriage-not-necessary-for-the-purpose-of-s-125-crpc\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/09\\\/12\\\/strict-proof-of-marriage-not-necessary-for-the-purpose-of-s-125-crpc\\\/\",\"name\":\"Strict proof of marriage not necessary for the purpose of S. 125 CrPC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-09-12T03:43:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-22T10:57:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/09\\\/12\\\/strict-proof-of-marriage-not-necessary-for-the-purpose-of-s-125-crpc\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/09\\\/12\\\/strict-proof-of-marriage-not-necessary-for-the-purpose-of-s-125-crpc\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/09\\\/12\\\/strict-proof-of-marriage-not-necessary-for-the-purpose-of-s-125-crpc\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Strict proof of marriage not necessary for the purpose of S. 125 CrPC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_2\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Strict proof of marriage not necessary for the purpose of S. 125 CrPC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/12\/strict-proof-of-marriage-not-necessary-for-the-purpose-of-s-125-crpc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Strict proof of marriage not necessary for the purpose of S. 125 CrPC","og_description":"Gauhati High Court: The Court was recently addressing a criminal revision petition against an order of the Additional Sessions Judge setting aside","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/12\/strict-proof-of-marriage-not-necessary-for-the-purpose-of-s-125-crpc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-09-12T03:43:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-22T10:57:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Gauhati-HC.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/12\/strict-proof-of-marriage-not-necessary-for-the-purpose-of-s-125-crpc\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/12\/strict-proof-of-marriage-not-necessary-for-the-purpose-of-s-125-crpc\/"},"author":{"name":"Saba","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"headline":"Strict proof of marriage not necessary for the purpose of S. 125 CrPC","datePublished":"2017-09-12T03:43:06+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-22T10:57:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/12\/strict-proof-of-marriage-not-necessary-for-the-purpose-of-s-125-crpc\/"},"wordCount":319,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["S. 125 CrPC","Strict proof of marriage"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/12\/strict-proof-of-marriage-not-necessary-for-the-purpose-of-s-125-crpc\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/12\/strict-proof-of-marriage-not-necessary-for-the-purpose-of-s-125-crpc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/12\/strict-proof-of-marriage-not-necessary-for-the-purpose-of-s-125-crpc\/","name":"Strict proof of marriage not necessary for the purpose of S. 125 CrPC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-09-12T03:43:06+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-22T10:57:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/12\/strict-proof-of-marriage-not-necessary-for-the-purpose-of-s-125-crpc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/12\/strict-proof-of-marriage-not-necessary-for-the-purpose-of-s-125-crpc\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/12\/strict-proof-of-marriage-not-necessary-for-the-purpose-of-s-125-crpc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Strict proof of marriage not necessary for the purpose of S. 125 CrPC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":267639,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/31\/can-a-husband-escape-from-his-liability-to-pay-maintenance-to-his-wife-by-signing-an-agreement-to-the-contrary-gauhati-high-court-section-125-crpc-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":155784,"position":0},"title":"Can a husband escape from his liability to pay maintenance to his wife by signing an agreement to the contrary? Gau HC throws light","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 31, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court: While addressing a matter with regard to maintenance of wife, Rumi Kumari Phukan, J., expressed that, the statutory right of a wife of maintenance cannot be bartered, done away with or negatived by the husband by setting up an agreement to the contrary. Petitioner has challenged the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":204233,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/proceedings-under-section-125-crpc-summary-in-nature-no-strict-proof-of-marriage-required-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":155784,"position":1},"title":"Proceedings under Section 125 CrPC summary in nature; no strict proof of marriage required: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhen the parties live together as husband and wife, there is presumption that they are legally married couple for claim of maintenance of wife under Section 125 CrPC.\u201d Supreme Court: The Bench comprising of R. Banumathi and Indira Banerjee, JJ., while setting aside the impugned judgment of the High Court\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222071,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/gau-hc-wife-who-leaves-matrimonial-home-of-her-own-but-under-compelling-circumstances-is-entitled-to-maintenance-under-s-125-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":155784,"position":2},"title":"Gau HC | Wife who leaves matrimonial home on her own, but under compelling circumstances, is entitled to maintenance under S. 125 CrPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court:\u00a0Hitesh Kumar Sarma, J., while disposing of a criminal revision petition filed against the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, modified the date from which the amount of maintenance was to be paid by the petitioner-husband to the respondent-wife on an application filed by her under Section 125\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":207286,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/27\/agreement-wherein-wife-relinquish-her-right-to-maintenance-is-unenforceable-bombay-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":155784,"position":3},"title":"Agreement wherein wife relinquish her right to maintenance is unenforceable: Bombay HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 27, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of M.S. Sonak, J. held in a petition by relying on several decisions that, \u201can agreement, in which wife gives up or relinquish her right to claim maintenance at any time in the future,is\u00a0 opposed to public policy and therefore, such an\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":257116,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/15\/can-wife-claim-maintenance-under-s-125-crpc-where-she-as-well-as-husband-had-spouses-living-at-the-time-of-alleged-marriage\/","url_meta":{"origin":155784,"position":4},"title":"Can wife claim maintenance under S. 125 CrPC where she as well as husband had spouses living at the time of alleged marriage? Del HC decides","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 15, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Subramonium Prasad, J.,\u00a0reversed the order of the Family Court which had granted maintenance to the respondent under Section 125 CrPC. Instant petition was filed for setting aside the Family Courts order wherein the trial court granted maintenance of Rs 4,200 per month to be paid by the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":236930,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/08\/madras-hc-is-an-illegitimate-child-entitled-to-maintenance-under-s-125-crpc-hc-reiterates-legal-position\/","url_meta":{"origin":155784,"position":5},"title":"Madras HC | Is an illegitimate child entitled to maintenance under S. 125 CrPC? HC reiterates legal position","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 8, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court:\u00a0B. Pugalendhi, J., while addressing an issue observed and reiterated the established position of the Supreme Court that, under Section 125 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 an illegitimate child is entitled to maintenance. Present criminal revision case was filed against the Judicial Magistrate's order. Petitioner's second wife i.e.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/155784","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=155784"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/155784\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=155784"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=155784"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=155784"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}