{"id":155204,"date":"2017-09-11T16:19:40","date_gmt":"2017-09-11T10:49:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=155204"},"modified":"2017-09-22T16:15:38","modified_gmt":"2017-09-22T10:45:38","slug":"high-court-refuses-to-invoke-revisional-jurisdiction-as-impugned-plaint-doesnt-suffer-from-any-irregularity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/11\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-revisional-jurisdiction-as-impugned-plaint-doesnt-suffer-from-any-irregularity\/","title":{"rendered":"High Court refuses to invoke revisional jurisdiction as impugned plaint doesn\u2019t suffer from any irregularity"},"content":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>The petitioner aggrieved by an order of rejection of his application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC by the Senior Civil Judge, Rajgarh preferred a petition. The respondent filed a suit for eviction and mesne profit against the petitioner-defendant before the Civil Judge, Rajgarh, Churu. During the pendency of the suit, the petitioner preferred an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of the plaint on the ground that the respondent had terminated his tenancy vide notice dated 30.11.14 and thereafter, the tenancy could not have been terminated by way of yet another notice dated 11.12.15 and therefore, the suit is liable to be dismissed as the same would be barred by the principle of res judicata. The application was rejected by the court observing that the objections raised by the petitioner could only be decided after framing the issues, on the basis of the evidence to be led by the parties.<\/p>\n

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner reiterating the stand taken before the court submitted that the tenancy having been terminated w.e.f. 30.11.14, the suit filed on the basis of the cause of action alleged to have been accrued pursuant to the notice dated 11.12.15 is not maintainable.<\/p>\n

The High Court held that it is settled law that while deciding an application for rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d), the court is not competent to go into correctness or otherwise of the allegations contained in the plaint. The Court stated that the plaint can only be rejected if from bare perusal of the statement in the plaint without any addition or subtraction it appears to be barred by law.<\/p>\n

The High Court not finding any infirmity, illegality or jurisdictional error in the trial court\u2019s verdict refused to exercise its revisional jurisdiction and dismissed the petition stating that the suit as framed in no manner could be said to be barred by law. [Sudesh Kumar Saini v. Shri Satyanarayan Ji Mandir Dharmarth Turst, Post Sadulpur Disstt Churu, 2017 SCC OnLine Raj 2417<\/a>, decided on 5.7.2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court:\u00a0The petitioner aggrieved by an order of rejection of his application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC by the Senior <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[22434,22424],"class_list":["post-155204","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-order-vii-rule-11-cpc","tag-rejection-of-plaint"],"yoast_head":"\nHigh Court refuses to invoke revisional jurisdiction as impugned plaint doesn\u2019t suffer from any irregularity | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/11\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-revisional-jurisdiction-as-impugned-plaint-doesnt-suffer-from-any-irregularity\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"High Court refuses to invoke revisional jurisdiction as impugned plaint doesn\u2019t suffer from any irregularity\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court:\u00a0The petitioner aggrieved by an order of rejection of his application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC by the Senior\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/11\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-revisional-jurisdiction-as-impugned-plaint-doesnt-suffer-from-any-irregularity\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-09-11T10:49:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-22T10:45:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/11\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-revisional-jurisdiction-as-impugned-plaint-doesnt-suffer-from-any-irregularity\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/11\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-revisional-jurisdiction-as-impugned-plaint-doesnt-suffer-from-any-irregularity\/\",\"name\":\"High Court refuses to invoke revisional jurisdiction as impugned plaint doesn\u2019t suffer from any irregularity | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-09-11T10:49:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-22T10:45:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/11\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-revisional-jurisdiction-as-impugned-plaint-doesnt-suffer-from-any-irregularity\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/11\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-revisional-jurisdiction-as-impugned-plaint-doesnt-suffer-from-any-irregularity\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/11\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-revisional-jurisdiction-as-impugned-plaint-doesnt-suffer-from-any-irregularity\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"High Court refuses to invoke revisional jurisdiction as impugned plaint doesn\u2019t suffer from any irregularity\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"High Court refuses to invoke revisional jurisdiction as impugned plaint doesn\u2019t suffer from any irregularity | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/11\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-revisional-jurisdiction-as-impugned-plaint-doesnt-suffer-from-any-irregularity\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"High Court refuses to invoke revisional jurisdiction as impugned plaint doesn\u2019t suffer from any irregularity","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court:\u00a0The petitioner aggrieved by an order of rejection of his application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC by the Senior","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/11\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-revisional-jurisdiction-as-impugned-plaint-doesnt-suffer-from-any-irregularity\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-09-11T10:49:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-22T10:45:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/11\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-revisional-jurisdiction-as-impugned-plaint-doesnt-suffer-from-any-irregularity\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/11\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-revisional-jurisdiction-as-impugned-plaint-doesnt-suffer-from-any-irregularity\/","name":"High Court refuses to invoke revisional jurisdiction as impugned plaint doesn\u2019t suffer from any irregularity | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-09-11T10:49:40+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-22T10:45:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/11\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-revisional-jurisdiction-as-impugned-plaint-doesnt-suffer-from-any-irregularity\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/11\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-revisional-jurisdiction-as-impugned-plaint-doesnt-suffer-from-any-irregularity\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/11\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-revisional-jurisdiction-as-impugned-plaint-doesnt-suffer-from-any-irregularity\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"High Court refuses to invoke revisional jurisdiction as impugned plaint doesn\u2019t suffer from any irregularity"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":315631,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":155204,"position":0},"title":"Calcutta High Court upholds rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC application despite disclosure of Cause of Action through \u2018clever drafting\u2019","author":"Ritu","date":"February 29, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court stated that \u201cOrder VII, Rule 11 is applicable to the plaint which does not disclose cause of action and not the cases where the plea is non-existence of cause of action.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":366581,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/rejection-plaint-application-of-mind-non-disclosure-of-cause-of-action-jk-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":155204,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Rejection of Plaint requires attentive application of mind, not routine action\u2019: J&K & Ladakh HC upholds Trial Court order for Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action","author":"Editor","date":"November 13, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe essence of an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC to terminate a civil action or to put an end to a litigation is an essential duty of a Civil Court so that further judicial time is not invested wastefully.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"rejection of plaint","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/rejection-of-plaint.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/rejection-of-plaint.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/rejection-of-plaint.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/rejection-of-plaint.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":315600,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/civil-court-jurisdiction-barred-by-section-85-of-waqf-act-cal-hc-allows-application-under-order-vii-rule-11d-cpc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":155204,"position":2},"title":"Civil Court lacks jurisdiction over Waqf Property disputes: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"February 29, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that \u201cin order to decide whether the suit is barred by any law, it is the statement in the plaint which will have to be construed.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":344285,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/24\/s-24-cpc-cannot-invoked-case-filed-in-court-without-jurisdiction-o-vii-r-10-cpc-invoked-bombay-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":155204,"position":3},"title":"S. 24 CPC cannot be invoked for proceedings filed without jurisdiction, Order VII Rule 10 CPC has to be invoked: Bombay High Court","author":"Editor","date":"March 24, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court held that when any Civil Court holds that it lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of the suit or application, it had to pass order under Order VII Rule 10 of CPC for return of plaint, and procedure of transfer of proceeding under Section 24 of CPC could\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":366333,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/12\/section-13-1a-cca-2015-supreme-court-rejection-of-plain-or-vii-rule-11-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":155204,"position":4},"title":"Order rejecting plaint under Or VII R 11 CPC is appealable under Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 12, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court distinguished Bank of India v. Maruti Civil Works, 2023 SCC OnLine Bom 2667, noting that it dealt with orders under Order VII Rules 10 and 11(d) CPC, which are not appealable under Order XLIII CPC.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Section 13(1A) CCA 2015","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Section-131A-CCA-2015.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Section-131A-CCA-2015.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Section-131A-CCA-2015.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Section-131A-CCA-2015.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":182384,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/19\/statute-describes-requires-thing-done-particular-manner-done-manner-not\/","url_meta":{"origin":155204,"position":5},"title":"When a statute describes or requires a thing to be done in a particular manner; it should be done in that manner or not at all","author":"Saba","date":"January 19, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Hyderabad High Court: In the instant appeal, question arose that whether the Application I.A.No. 1751 of 2006 filed for recovery of shares, is an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 or whether it is an application under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC seeking rejection\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/155204","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=155204"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/155204\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=155204"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=155204"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=155204"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}