{"id":154334,"date":"2017-09-06T15:38:58","date_gmt":"2017-09-06T10:08:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=154334"},"modified":"2017-09-22T15:50:22","modified_gmt":"2017-09-22T10:20:22","slug":"high-court-refuses-to-invoke-inherent-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-as-fir-disclosed-commission-of-offence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/06\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-inherent-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-as-fir-disclosed-commission-of-offence\/","title":{"rendered":"High Court refuses to invoke inherent jurisdiction under S. 482 CrPC as FIR disclosed commission of offence"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Rajasthan High Court: <\/strong>The petitioner preferred a criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR No. 322\/2016 for the offences under Sections 115 and 108 IPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that taking advantage of an official position and being a politically powerful person, Respondent 2 has lodged the FIR with a limited object of putting undue pressure upon the present petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also raised the issue of criminal antecedents of Respondent 2, which according to him, reflected that Respondent 2 himself was not on the right side of law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Learned Public Prosecutor assured the Court that appropriate, proper, fair and impartial investigation has to be made in this case and all the stands taken by the petitioner, respondent-complaint has to be considered at the time of investigation and before completing the same, no indulgence ought to be granted by this Court under the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC at this stage.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Learned Public Prosecutor also stated that the scope of Section 482 CrPC has to be strictly looked into, in terms of the original criminal jurisprudence emanating out of the precedent law laid down by the Hon\u2019ble Apex Court in <em>State of Haryana<\/em> v.\u00a0 <em>Bhajan Lal<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForDocumentLink\/I3Fw9H16\">1992 Supp (1) SCC 335<\/a>, whereby it has been held that the powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. can be invoked where the allegations made in the FIR or complaint are absurd and inherently improbable. He also cited the case of Gurumukh Das v. State of Rajasthan,\u00a02016 0 Supreme (Raj) 1086, wherein the Rajasthan High Court had held that it was the statutory right of the police to investigate, where FIR disclosed commission of offence, and in such cases, FIR should not be quashed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court opined that on a bare reading of the FIR, it was apparent that it was not a case where any indulgence could be granted to the petitioner, as the wordings of the FIR, prima facie, clearly constituted an offence, and therefore, there was no reason to by-pass the settled procedure of investigation and trial in this case. The High Court, taking note of the fact that the petitioner himself had a case under Section 302 IPC registered against him on the basis on an overall assessment of the facts as well as the record of the case, held that the case did not call for any interference under the inherent jurisdiction of the Court under Section 482 CrPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Consequently dismissing the miscellaneous petition the Court directed a free, fair and impartial investigation to be made in the matter, thereby, concluding the case to be unfit for invocation of inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC. [Hari Ram v. State of Rajasthan,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForDocumentLink\/ts964i02\"> 2017 SCC OnLine Raj 2400<\/a>, decided on 5.7.2017]<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rajasthan High Court: The petitioner preferred a criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR No. 322\/2016 for the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[14401],"class_list":["post-154334","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-s-482-crpc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>High Court refuses to invoke inherent jurisdiction under S. 482 CrPC as FIR disclosed commission of offence | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/06\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-inherent-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-as-fir-disclosed-commission-of-offence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"High Court refuses to invoke inherent jurisdiction under S. 482 CrPC as FIR disclosed commission of offence\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court: The petitioner preferred a criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR No. 322\/2016 for the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/06\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-inherent-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-as-fir-disclosed-commission-of-offence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-09-06T10:08:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-22T10:20:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/06\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-inherent-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-as-fir-disclosed-commission-of-offence\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/06\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-inherent-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-as-fir-disclosed-commission-of-offence\/\",\"name\":\"High Court refuses to invoke inherent jurisdiction under S. 482 CrPC as FIR disclosed commission of offence | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-09-06T10:08:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-22T10:20:22+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/06\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-inherent-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-as-fir-disclosed-commission-of-offence\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/06\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-inherent-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-as-fir-disclosed-commission-of-offence\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/06\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-inherent-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-as-fir-disclosed-commission-of-offence\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"High Court refuses to invoke inherent jurisdiction under S. 482 CrPC as FIR disclosed commission of offence\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"High Court refuses to invoke inherent jurisdiction under S. 482 CrPC as FIR disclosed commission of offence | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/06\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-inherent-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-as-fir-disclosed-commission-of-offence\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"High Court refuses to invoke inherent jurisdiction under S. 482 CrPC as FIR disclosed commission of offence","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court: The petitioner preferred a criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR No. 322\/2016 for the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/06\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-inherent-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-as-fir-disclosed-commission-of-offence\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-09-06T10:08:58+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-22T10:20:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/06\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-inherent-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-as-fir-disclosed-commission-of-offence\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/06\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-inherent-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-as-fir-disclosed-commission-of-offence\/","name":"High Court refuses to invoke inherent jurisdiction under S. 482 CrPC as FIR disclosed commission of offence | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-09-06T10:08:58+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-22T10:20:22+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/06\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-inherent-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-as-fir-disclosed-commission-of-offence\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/06\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-inherent-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-as-fir-disclosed-commission-of-offence\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/06\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-inherent-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-as-fir-disclosed-commission-of-offence\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"High Court refuses to invoke inherent jurisdiction under S. 482 CrPC as FIR disclosed commission of offence"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":214769,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/17\/hp-hc-fir-in-non-compoundable-offences-pertaining-to-matrimonial-disputes-can-be-quashed-if-the-parties-have-settled-dispute-amicably\/","url_meta":{"origin":154334,"position":0},"title":"HP HC | FIR in non-compoundable offences pertaining to matrimonial disputes can be quashed if the parties have settled dispute amicably","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J. allowed a petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR registered for offences under Sections 498-A and 506 of the Penal Code, 1860, on the ground that parties had entered into a compromise. In\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219003,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/02\/hp-hc-fir-or-complaint-can-be-quashed-under-s-482-crpc-to-meet-ends-of-justice-even-in-non-compoundable-offences\/","url_meta":{"origin":154334,"position":1},"title":"HP HC | FIR or complaint can be quashed under S. 482 CrPC to meet ends of justice, even in non-compoundable offences","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J. entertained a writ petition filed under Section 482 of CrPC for quashing FIR registered under Sections 376,366 and 506 of IPC. The facts of the case were that the petitioner had a relationship with a woman who was already married to one\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":241433,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/29\/mp-hc-it-is-true-that-alternative-remedy-is-not-an-absolute-bar-to-a-writ-petition-but-it-is-equally-well-settled-that-if-there-is-an-alternative-remedy-the-high-court-should-not-ordinarily-interfe\/","url_meta":{"origin":154334,"position":2},"title":"MP HC | It is true that alternative remedy is not an absolute bar to a writ petition, but it is equally well settled that if there is an alternative remedy HC should not ordinarily interfere","author":"Editor","date":"December 29, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: S.A. Dharmadhikari, J., dismissed the instant petition filed under Articles 226 and 227. The facts of the case follow as, the respondent, who was a person of criminal antecedents, had come with his relatives armed with Pharsas and Guns to the petitioner and threatened to eliminate\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":227174,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/17\/hp-hc-s-482-crpc-empowers-high-court-to-quash-fir-even-in-non-compoundable-cases-to-meet-ends-of-justice\/","url_meta":{"origin":154334,"position":3},"title":"HP HC | S. 482 CrPC empowers High Court to quash FIR even in non-compoundable cases to meet ends of justice","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J. quashed the FIR to meet ends of justice and prevent the abuse of the process of the Court. The brief facts of the case are that on 27-01-2019, respondent 2 boarded a private bus at village Dharla, District Mandi, which was coming\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":259938,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/13\/kar-hc-while-deciding-the-petition-under-s-482-of-crpc-evidence-cannot-be-appreciated-as-it-lies-within-the-domain-of-trial-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":154334,"position":4},"title":"Kar HC |\u00a0 While deciding the petition under S. 482 of CrPC evidence cannot be appreciated as it lies within the domain of Trial Court","author":"Editor","date":"January 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: Sreenivas Harish Kumar J. dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are such that the 1st petitioner is the husband of 2nd respondent. On certain allegations that the petitioners subjected the 2nd respondent to harassment in connection with demand for dowry, FIR\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":154844,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/07\/himachal-pradesh-hc-quashes-fir-exercising-its-power-under-s-482-of-crpc-in-light-of-compromise-between-the-parties\/","url_meta":{"origin":154334,"position":5},"title":"Himachal Pradesh\u00a0HC quashes FIR exercising its power under S. 482 of CrPC in light of compromise between the parties","author":"Saba","date":"September 7, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Himachal Pradesh: While deciding a petition under Section 482 of CrPC praying to quash the FIR registered in a criminal case, a Single Judge Bench of Sanjay Karol, Acting CJ, held that when the respondent\/complainant, who is the worst affected person on account of the accident, does\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154334","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=154334"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154334\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=154334"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=154334"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=154334"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}