{"id":153994,"date":"2017-09-04T12:11:42","date_gmt":"2017-09-04T06:41:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=153994"},"modified":"2018-01-29T17:23:17","modified_gmt":"2018-01-29T11:53:17","slug":"tdsat-reserves-adjudication-order-in-a-transmission-matter-in-das-notified-area-directing-parties-to-reconcile-differences","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/04\/tdsat-reserves-adjudication-order-in-a-transmission-matter-in-das-notified-area-directing-parties-to-reconcile-differences\/","title":{"rendered":"TDSAT reserves adjudication order in a transmission matter in DAS notified area, directing parties to reconcile differences"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Telecom Disputes Settlement &amp; Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT):\u00a0<\/strong>The petitioner, Hathway Cable and Datacom Ltd. is a public limited company and a cable television service provider duly registered as MSO\/cable operator had entered into an agreement with the respondent, Odisha Television Ltd., a broadcaster engaged in the business of distribution of television channels with exclusive right to market and distribute television channels. The term of the agreement was of 3 years and the agreement was in consonance with the Digital Addressable System (DAS) notified areas.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was the case of the petitioner that the respondent has been deliberately refusing to come to the negotiation table for finalization of the terms and conditions of renewal of the agreement. While the petitioners contended that the respondent was favoring another MSO entity, the respondents alleged piracy by the petitioner in contravention of the agreement. The petitioners prayed to direct the respondents to execute and renew the Subscription Agreement on just, equitable and non-discriminatory terms in accordance with the Digital Addressable Cable Television Systems (DAS) Regulations, 2012.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Telecom Disputes Settlement &amp;\u00a0Appellate Tribunal, without getting into adjudication directly, and categorically stating that supply of signals for further transmission in analog mode being completely prohibited and the whole country falling under DAS w.e.f.1.4.2017, adopted an ad-interim arrangement directing the parties to reconcile and negotiate the commercial terms and conditions and sign the interconnect agreement in accordance with extant regulations as well as making it clear that payment of outstanding liability to not be a precondition for signing of the interconnect agreement. [Hathway Cable &amp; Datacom Ltd. v. Odisha Television Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/d5n1894i\">2017 SCC OnLine TDSAT 329<\/a>, decided on 31.8.2017]<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Telecom Disputes Settlement &amp; Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT):\u00a0The petitioner, Hathway Cable and Datacom Ltd. is a public limited company and a cable television <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":24302,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[22184,22194],"class_list":["post-153994","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-das-regulations","tag-transmission-in-analog-mode"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>TDSAT reserves adjudication order in a transmission matter in DAS notified area, directing parties to reconcile differences | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/04\/tdsat-reserves-adjudication-order-in-a-transmission-matter-in-das-notified-area-directing-parties-to-reconcile-differences\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"TDSAT reserves adjudication order in a transmission matter in DAS notified area, directing parties to reconcile differences\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Telecom Disputes Settlement &amp; Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT):\u00a0The petitioner, Hathway Cable and Datacom Ltd. is a public limited company and a cable television\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/04\/tdsat-reserves-adjudication-order-in-a-transmission-matter-in-das-notified-area-directing-parties-to-reconcile-differences\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-09-04T06:41:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-01-29T11:53:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/04\/tdsat-reserves-adjudication-order-in-a-transmission-matter-in-das-notified-area-directing-parties-to-reconcile-differences\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/04\/tdsat-reserves-adjudication-order-in-a-transmission-matter-in-das-notified-area-directing-parties-to-reconcile-differences\/\",\"name\":\"TDSAT reserves adjudication order in a transmission matter in DAS notified area, directing parties to reconcile differences | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/04\/tdsat-reserves-adjudication-order-in-a-transmission-matter-in-das-notified-area-directing-parties-to-reconcile-differences\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/04\/tdsat-reserves-adjudication-order-in-a-transmission-matter-in-das-notified-area-directing-parties-to-reconcile-differences\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-09-04T06:41:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-29T11:53:17+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/04\/tdsat-reserves-adjudication-order-in-a-transmission-matter-in-das-notified-area-directing-parties-to-reconcile-differences\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/04\/tdsat-reserves-adjudication-order-in-a-transmission-matter-in-das-notified-area-directing-parties-to-reconcile-differences\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/04\/tdsat-reserves-adjudication-order-in-a-transmission-matter-in-das-notified-area-directing-parties-to-reconcile-differences\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/04\/tdsat-reserves-adjudication-order-in-a-transmission-matter-in-das-notified-area-directing-parties-to-reconcile-differences\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"TDSAT reserves adjudication order in a transmission matter in DAS notified area, directing parties to reconcile differences\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"TDSAT reserves adjudication order in a transmission matter in DAS notified area, directing parties to reconcile differences | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/04\/tdsat-reserves-adjudication-order-in-a-transmission-matter-in-das-notified-area-directing-parties-to-reconcile-differences\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"TDSAT reserves adjudication order in a transmission matter in DAS notified area, directing parties to reconcile differences","og_description":"Telecom Disputes Settlement &amp; Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT):\u00a0The petitioner, Hathway Cable and Datacom Ltd. is a public limited company and a cable television","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/04\/tdsat-reserves-adjudication-order-in-a-transmission-matter-in-das-notified-area-directing-parties-to-reconcile-differences\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-09-04T06:41:42+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-01-29T11:53:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/04\/tdsat-reserves-adjudication-order-in-a-transmission-matter-in-das-notified-area-directing-parties-to-reconcile-differences\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/04\/tdsat-reserves-adjudication-order-in-a-transmission-matter-in-das-notified-area-directing-parties-to-reconcile-differences\/","name":"TDSAT reserves adjudication order in a transmission matter in DAS notified area, directing parties to reconcile differences | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/04\/tdsat-reserves-adjudication-order-in-a-transmission-matter-in-das-notified-area-directing-parties-to-reconcile-differences\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/04\/tdsat-reserves-adjudication-order-in-a-transmission-matter-in-das-notified-area-directing-parties-to-reconcile-differences\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg","datePublished":"2017-09-04T06:41:42+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-29T11:53:17+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/04\/tdsat-reserves-adjudication-order-in-a-transmission-matter-in-das-notified-area-directing-parties-to-reconcile-differences\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/04\/tdsat-reserves-adjudication-order-in-a-transmission-matter-in-das-notified-area-directing-parties-to-reconcile-differences\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/04\/tdsat-reserves-adjudication-order-in-a-transmission-matter-in-das-notified-area-directing-parties-to-reconcile-differences\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/04\/tdsat-reserves-adjudication-order-in-a-transmission-matter-in-das-notified-area-directing-parties-to-reconcile-differences\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"TDSAT reserves adjudication order in a transmission matter in DAS notified area, directing parties to reconcile differences"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/TDSAT.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":237347,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/12\/del-hc-why-was-broadcast-audience-research-council-of-indias-new-algorithm-to-mitigate-the-impact-of-landing-page-on-viewership-data-across-television-channels-challenged\/","url_meta":{"origin":153994,"position":0},"title":"Del HC | Why was Broadcast Audience Research Council of India\u2019s new algorithm to mitigate impact of \u2018Landing Page\u2019 on viewership data across television channels challenged? HC\u2019s analysis","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 12, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Navin Chawla, J., refused to pass an interim injunction in regard to the communication dated 03-09-2020 along with Press Release dated 03-09-2020 and Frequently Asked Questions issued by the respondent, BARC. Jurisdiction to adjudicate the present dispute The basis of the present petition was that the disputes\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":221491,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/25\/tdsat-lcn-once-assigned-not-to-be-changed-before-1-year-zee-channels-to-be-restored-to-earlier-lcns\/","url_meta":{"origin":153994,"position":1},"title":"TDSAT | LCN once assigned, not to be changed before 1 year; Zee channels to be restored to earlier LCNs","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 25, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT): The Coram of Justice Shiva Kirti Singh (Chairperson) and A.K. Bhargava (Member) heard two petitions together as they raise common issues of law and are based on identical facts. The petitioner, ZEE Entertainment Enterprise Ltd. had alleged that the respondents have removed the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245698,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/17\/tdsat\/","url_meta":{"origin":153994,"position":2},"title":"TDSAT | A dispute between two service providers may be maintainable even in absence of a subsisting agreement; Totality of facts to be considered","author":"Editor","date":"March 17, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Telecom Disputes Settlement Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT): Justice Shiva Kirti Singh dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. Facts The facts of the case are such that the petitioner is a Multi-System Operator i.e. MSO and Respondent 1 is a Local Cable Operator i.e. LCO in Andhra Pradesh within the area\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":31431,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/02\/petition-filed-by-asianet-satellite-communication-ltd-seeking-recovery-of-rs-1-30-crores-towards-balance-of-carriage-fees-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":153994,"position":3},"title":"Petition filed by Asianet Satellite Communication Ltd. seeking recovery of Rs. 1.30 crores towards balance of carriage fees, dismissed","author":"Sucheta","date":"January 2, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) :\u00a0TDSAT has dismissed a petition filed by Asianet Satellite Communication Ltd. seeking payment from a local cable operator Sathyadhara Communications Pvt. Ltd. for the period for which the signals were sent even after expiry of a valid interconnect agreement. The recovery petition was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325175,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/27\/delhi-high-court-directs-uninterrupted-transmission-tv9-telugu-channel-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":153994,"position":4},"title":"High Court was approached due to absence of Vacation Bench in TDSAT; Delhi High Court directs uninterrupted transmission of \u2018TV9 Telugu Channel\u2019","author":"Arunima","date":"June 27, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The writ petitions were filed by Associated Broadcasting Company Private Limited, who broadcasts the TV9 Telugu channel, against a Multi System Operator (MSO) and service provider under TRAI Act, 1997 alleging that the operator disconnected its channel without issuing the required disconnection notice.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":221817,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/06\/tdsat-super-channels-directed-to-pay-the-amount-due-for-supply-of-signals-to-sony-pictures\/","url_meta":{"origin":153994,"position":5},"title":"TDSAT | Super Channels directed to pay the amount due for supply of signals to Sony Pictures","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 6, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT): Justice Shiva Kirti Singh (Chairperson) while allowing the petition directed the respondent to pay the decretal amount within six weeks of the order failing which the petitioner will be entitled to realize the amount through execution application. Petitioner, Sony Pictures Network India Pvt.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153994","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=153994"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153994\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/24302"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=153994"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=153994"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=153994"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}