{"id":153884,"date":"2017-09-07T10:32:38","date_gmt":"2017-09-07T05:02:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=153884"},"modified":"2017-09-07T10:32:38","modified_gmt":"2017-09-07T05:02:38","slug":"2017-scc-vol-7-august-28-2017-part-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/07\/2017-scc-vol-7-august-28-2017-part-4\/","title":{"rendered":"2017 SCC Vol. 7 August 28, 2017 Part 4"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 2(1)(e), 42, 20, 9 and 11 \u2014 Appointment of arbitrators \u2014 Juridical seat of arbitration chosen by parties in terms of arbitration agreement:<\/strong> Designation of seat of arbitration is itself akin to an exclusive jurisdiction clause as to the courts exercising supervisory powers over the arbitration. [Indus Mobile Distribution (P) Ltd. v. Datawind Innovations (P) Ltd.,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForDocumentLink\/qP09fA10\">(2017) 7 SCC 678<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Constitution of India \u2014 Art. 21 \u2014 Death of farmers in Tamil Nadu: Directions issued regarding two aspects:<\/strong> (1) Availability of awareness of Minimum Support Price (MSP) and (2) Establishment of mandis within acceptable radius of holdings and for opening of procurement centres on time. [T.N. Centre for Public Interest Litigation v. State of T.N.,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForDocumentLink\/410WrEDs\">(2017) 7 SCC 652<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Cooperative Societies \u2014 Cooperative Housing\/Housing Society \u2014 Allotment of land to revived societies:<\/strong> As the revival of the Societies was illegal and was manipulated by persons who had no connection with the Societies and prima facie, the builder mafia had a big hand in getting the Societies revived, therefore, DDA directed to refund the money deposited for such land by the Societies with interest. Fraudulent revival of societies under liquidation, in collusion with builder mafia only to grab land cannot be permitted. [DDA v. Bankmens Coop. Group Housing Society Ltd.,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForDocumentLink\/E9P76ko7\">(2017) 7 SCC 636<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 \u2014 Ss. 172(2) and (3) \u2014 Right of accused to cross-examine police officer with reference to entries in police diary:<\/strong> Right of accused to cross-examine police officer with reference to entries in police diary, is very much limited in extent and even that limited scope arises only when court uses such entries to contradict police officer or when police officer uses it for refreshing his memory and that again is subject to provisions of Ss. 145 and 161, Evidence Act. Thus, a witness may be cross-examined as to his previous statements made by him as contemplated under S. 145, Evidence Act, if such previous statements are brought on record, in accordance with law, before court and if contingencies as contemplated under S. 172(3) CrPC are fulfilled. S. 145, Evidence Act does not either extend or control provisions of S. 172 CrPC. There is no scope in S. 172 CrPC to enable court, prosecution or accused to use police diary for purpose of contradicting any witness other than police officer, who made it. Denial of right to accused to inspect case diary cannot be characterised as unreasonable or arbitrary. Confidentiality is always kept in the matter of investigation and it is not desirable to make available the police diary to accused on his demand. [Balakram v. State of Uttarakhand,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForDocumentLink\/44KsrtNQ\">(2017) 7 SCC 668<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Education and Universities \u2014 Medical and Dental Colleges \u2014 Reservation of seats\/Quota\/Exemption\/Priority in Medical\/Dental Institutions \u2014 Criteria for reservation \u2014\u00a0Institutional reservation:<\/strong> In Central universities like AMU and BHU or other Central institutions like All-India Institute of Medical Sciences, etc., there is no State quota and seats have to be filled up on basis of merit but 50% reservation in PG seats is permissible for MBBS students of respective institutions only, as per decision of Constitution Bench in <em>Saurabh Chaudri<\/em> v. <em>Union of India<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForDocumentLink\/313CWT02\">(2003) 11 SCC 146<\/a>. High Court, thus, erred in setting aside institutional preference in AMU and BHU. Further, High Court overstepped its jurisdiction and went beyond scope of writ petition while issuing direction relating to AMU and BHU. As issue was admittedly not raised by appellant-petitioners, High Court order and all consequential actions taken by State Government, reversed in this respect. Time for admission only in respect of said seats extended up to 12-6-2017. [Saurabh Dwivedi v. Union of India,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForDocumentLink\/UYxU7KWL\">(2017) 7 SCC 626<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Human and Civil Rights \u2014 Children\u2019s Rights \u2014 Generally \u2014 PIL initially raising issue of sex abuse of children in orphanages and government schools:<\/strong> A broader and purposeful interpretation to definition of \u201cchild in need of care and protection\u201d in S. 14(2), Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, given. Said definition in addition to child in conflict with law must also include victims of sexual abuse\/assault\/harassment under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO) Act as also victims of child trafficking. Said definition is illustrative and benefits envisaged for children in need of care and protection should be extended to all such children in fact requiring State care and protection. Such children must also be given protection under Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 being victims of crime under the POCSO Act and the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. [Exploitation of Children in, In Re,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForDocumentLink\/8uzevyoc\">(2017) 7 SCC 578<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Income Tax Act, 1961 \u2014 S. 40(a)(i-a) r\/w Ss. 194-C, 200 &amp; 201 \u2014 Scope of \u2014 Deduction claimed from income chargeable under the head \u201cProfits and gains of business or profession\u201d, on account of amounts paid to sub-contractor towards freight allowance \u2014 Disallowance of, when assessee fails to deduct tax on such amounts paid at source:<\/strong> On analysing the scheme of obligation to deduct the tax at source and paying it over to the Central Government under Ss. 194-C, 200 &amp; 201, held that it could not be said that the word \u201cpayable\u201d occurring in S. 40(a)(i-a) referred to only those cases where the amount was yet to be paid and did not cover the cases where the amount was actually paid. Therefore, S. 40(a)(i-a) covered not only those cases where the amount is payable but also when it is paid. Thus, amount paid without deduction of TDS, is not allowable as deduction. [Palam Gas Service v. CIT,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForDocumentLink\/70T2CLeo\">(2017) 7 SCC 613<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (30 of 2004) \u2014 Ss. 6(1)(a) and 6(1)(d) \u2014 Noti. SRO No. 119 of 2008 \u2014 \u201cFruit juice based drink\u201d, as in this case, \u201cAppy Fizz\u201d using carbon dioxide as a preservative:<\/strong> Classification of \u201cfruit juice based drink\u201d, as in this case, \u201cAppy Fizz\u201d using carbon dioxide as a preservative, as \u201caerated branded soft drink\u201d, post 2007 i.e. post deletion of Entry 71(4) by SRO No. 119, is incorrect. Said drink remained a \u201cfruit juice based drink\u201d. Therefore, the fruit based drink i.e. \u201cAppy Fizz\u201d classifiable under Item 5 of Entry 71 as amended with tax liability at 12.5% as opposed to 20% on \u201caerated branded soft drink\u201d. [Parle Agro (P) Ltd. v. CCT,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForDocumentLink\/21AtdNnq\">(2017) 7 SCC 540<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Specific Relief Act, 1963 \u2014 Ss. 38 and 41(g) \u2014 Suit for permanent injunction to restrain interference with possession of land:<\/strong> One of the conditions for grant of injunction to restrain interference with possession of land is that possession of plaintiff over the land must be lawful. [Agnigundala Venkata Ranga Rao v. Indukuru Ramachandra Reddy,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForDocumentLink\/7T46o9X5\">(2017) 7 SCC 694<\/a>]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 2(1)(e), 42, 20, 9 and 11 \u2014 Appointment of arbitrators \u2014 Juridical seat of arbitration <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":102451,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-153884","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>2017 SCC Vol. 7 August 28, 2017 Part 4 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/07\/2017-scc-vol-7-august-28-2017-part-4\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2017 SCC Vol. 7 August 28, 2017 Part 4\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 2(1)(e), 42, 20, 9 and 11 \u2014 Appointment of arbitrators \u2014 Juridical seat of arbitration\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/07\/2017-scc-vol-7-august-28-2017-part-4\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-09-07T05:02:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/07\/2017-scc-vol-7-august-28-2017-part-4\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/07\/2017-scc-vol-7-august-28-2017-part-4\/\",\"name\":\"2017 SCC Vol. 7 August 28, 2017 Part 4 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/07\/2017-scc-vol-7-august-28-2017-part-4\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/07\/2017-scc-vol-7-august-28-2017-part-4\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-09-07T05:02:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/07\/2017-scc-vol-7-august-28-2017-part-4\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/07\/2017-scc-vol-7-august-28-2017-part-4\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/07\/2017-scc-vol-7-august-28-2017-part-4\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/07\/2017-scc-vol-7-august-28-2017-part-4\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2017 SCC Vol. 7 August 28, 2017 Part 4\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2017 SCC Vol. 7 August 28, 2017 Part 4 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/07\/2017-scc-vol-7-august-28-2017-part-4\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2017 SCC Vol. 7 August 28, 2017 Part 4","og_description":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 2(1)(e), 42, 20, 9 and 11 \u2014 Appointment of arbitrators \u2014 Juridical seat of arbitration","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/07\/2017-scc-vol-7-august-28-2017-part-4\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-09-07T05:02:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/07\/2017-scc-vol-7-august-28-2017-part-4\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/07\/2017-scc-vol-7-august-28-2017-part-4\/","name":"2017 SCC Vol. 7 August 28, 2017 Part 4 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/07\/2017-scc-vol-7-august-28-2017-part-4\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/07\/2017-scc-vol-7-august-28-2017-part-4\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","datePublished":"2017-09-07T05:02:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/07\/2017-scc-vol-7-august-28-2017-part-4\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/07\/2017-scc-vol-7-august-28-2017-part-4\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/07\/2017-scc-vol-7-august-28-2017-part-4\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/07\/2017-scc-vol-7-august-28-2017-part-4\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2017 SCC Vol. 7 August 28, 2017 Part 4"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":217385,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/29\/determination-of-seat-law-by-the-indian-courts\/","url_meta":{"origin":153884,"position":0},"title":"Determination of Seat Law by the Indian Courts","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 29, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"by Alok Vajpeyi\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/AdobeStock_135924743.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/AdobeStock_135924743.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/AdobeStock_135924743.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/AdobeStock_135924743.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/AdobeStock_135924743.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":275962,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/20\/party-autonomy-or-the-choice-of-seat-the-essence-of-arbitration\/","url_meta":{"origin":153884,"position":1},"title":"Party Autonomy or the Choice of Seat: The Essence of Arbitration","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Paridhi Jain\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-153-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-153-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-153-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-153-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-153-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239477,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/21\/implied-exclusion-of-jurisdiction-in-arbitration\/","url_meta":{"origin":153884,"position":2},"title":"Implied Exclusion of Jurisdiction in Arbitration","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 21, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by Abhishek Sharma*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/arbitraiton-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/arbitraiton-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/arbitraiton-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/arbitraiton-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/arbitraiton-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288068,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/31\/conflict-of-laws-vis-vis-foreign-seat-of-arbitration\/","url_meta":{"origin":153884,"position":3},"title":"Conflict of Laws vis-&agrave;-vis Foreign Seat of Arbitration","author":"Editor","date":"March 31, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Mayank Singh\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Conflict of Laws","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-946.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-946.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-946.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-946.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":252416,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/07\/juxtaposing-seat-of-arbitration\/","url_meta":{"origin":153884,"position":4},"title":"Juxtaposing Seat of Arbitration vis-\u00e0-vis Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses: Judicial Trend Thus Far","author":"Editor","date":"August 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Jeevan Ballav Panda\u2020 and Satish Padhi\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-78.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-78.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-78.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-78.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-78.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":210176,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/18\/ker-hc-designation-of-seat-of-arbitration-in-an-agreement-is-akin-to-an-exclusive-jurisdiction-clause\/","url_meta":{"origin":153884,"position":5},"title":"Ker HC | Designation of seat of arbitration in an agreement is akin to an exclusive jurisdiction clause","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of V. Chitambaresh and R. Narayana Pisharadi, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed against the order of District Judge refusing to entertain a petition challenging arbitral award. Appellant was a guarantor to the loan availed of by a company named Anugraha Wood Products Limited from\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153884","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=153884"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153884\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/102451"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=153884"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=153884"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=153884"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}