{"id":152154,"date":"2017-08-25T16:34:56","date_gmt":"2017-08-25T11:04:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=152154"},"modified":"2017-08-25T16:34:56","modified_gmt":"2017-08-25T11:04:56","slug":"in-a-divorce-petition-if-both-parties-are-domiciled-in-india-then-a-court-at-dubai-is-not-a-court-with-competent-jurisdiction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/25\/in-a-divorce-petition-if-both-parties-are-domiciled-in-india-then-a-court-at-dubai-is-not-a-court-with-competent-jurisdiction\/","title":{"rendered":"In a divorce petition, if both parties are domiciled in India then a Court at Dubai is not a court with competent jurisdiction"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Bombay High Court:<\/strong> A Division Bench comprising of A.S. Oka and Anuja Prabhudessai. JJ., heard an appeal filed by the appellant who was aggrieved by an order passed by the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai. Subsequent to the marriage between the appellant and respondent in India, they shifted to Dubai and had two children. However, in 2008, the appellant returned to India with her children and had been residing here ever since. Subsequently, she filed a petition for divorce on the ground of cruelty and also claimed maintenance and accommodation for herself and for the children.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The respondent questioned the maintainability of the petition on the grounds that in 2012, a Dubai court had granted his petition for divorce ex-parte due to failure on the wife\u2019s part to appear before the Court. Hence, the petition before the Bandra Court was barred by the principles of res judicata. In the present appeal, the appellant had contended that the Court at Dubai was not a competent court to adjudicate the issue and that the forum as well as the grounds on which relief had been granted was not in accordance with the matrimonial law that was governing the parties.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court relied on guidelines framed by the Supreme Court in <em>Y. Narasimha Rao<\/em> v. <em>Y. Venkata Lakshmi<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForDocumentLink\/5FdgnM1f\">(1991) 3 SCC 451\u00a0<\/a>and discussed what foreign judgments are not conclusive; whether the Court at Dubai had jurisdiction and whether the parties were domiciled in India or in Dubai. As per the guidelines, the law under which the parties are married must recognize the court to be a court of competent jurisdiction; a court is of a competent jurisdiction if action is filed in the forum where the parties are domiciled or permanently reside, the other party must voluntarily and unconditionally submit himself\/ herself to the jurisdiction of the court; and that a judgment will be unenforceable if it is against the principles of natural justice or if it has been obtained by fraud.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court, rejecting the contentions of the respondent, and setting aside the decision of the Family Court, decided that in the present case, both the parties were Indian nationals, whose marriage was governed by the Hindu Marriage Act of 1955. Since, the appellant had not submitted to the jurisdiction of the Court at Dubai, and no arrangements were made to ensure her presence in the proceedings before the Dubai court, the judgment was\u00a0against principles of natural justice and liable to be set aside on grounds of it being delivered by a court of law without jurisdiction. [Shilpa Sachdev v. Anand Sachdev, Family Court Appeal No. 56 of 2016, decided on 11.08.2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bombay High Court: A Division Bench comprising of A.S. Oka and Anuja Prabhudessai. JJ., heard an appeal filed by the appellant who <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":74381,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-152154","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>In a divorce petition, if both parties are domiciled in India then a Court at Dubai is not a court with competent jurisdiction | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/25\/in-a-divorce-petition-if-both-parties-are-domiciled-in-india-then-a-court-at-dubai-is-not-a-court-with-competent-jurisdiction\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"In a divorce petition, if both parties are domiciled in India then a Court at Dubai is not a court with competent jurisdiction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench comprising of A.S. Oka and Anuja Prabhudessai. JJ., heard an appeal filed by the appellant who\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/25\/in-a-divorce-petition-if-both-parties-are-domiciled-in-india-then-a-court-at-dubai-is-not-a-court-with-competent-jurisdiction\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-08-25T11:04:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/25\/in-a-divorce-petition-if-both-parties-are-domiciled-in-india-then-a-court-at-dubai-is-not-a-court-with-competent-jurisdiction\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/25\/in-a-divorce-petition-if-both-parties-are-domiciled-in-india-then-a-court-at-dubai-is-not-a-court-with-competent-jurisdiction\/\",\"name\":\"In a divorce petition, if both parties are domiciled in India then a Court at Dubai is not a court with competent jurisdiction | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/25\/in-a-divorce-petition-if-both-parties-are-domiciled-in-india-then-a-court-at-dubai-is-not-a-court-with-competent-jurisdiction\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/25\/in-a-divorce-petition-if-both-parties-are-domiciled-in-india-then-a-court-at-dubai-is-not-a-court-with-competent-jurisdiction\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-08-25T11:04:56+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/25\/in-a-divorce-petition-if-both-parties-are-domiciled-in-india-then-a-court-at-dubai-is-not-a-court-with-competent-jurisdiction\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/25\/in-a-divorce-petition-if-both-parties-are-domiciled-in-india-then-a-court-at-dubai-is-not-a-court-with-competent-jurisdiction\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/25\/in-a-divorce-petition-if-both-parties-are-domiciled-in-india-then-a-court-at-dubai-is-not-a-court-with-competent-jurisdiction\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/25\/in-a-divorce-petition-if-both-parties-are-domiciled-in-india-then-a-court-at-dubai-is-not-a-court-with-competent-jurisdiction\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"In a divorce petition, if both parties are domiciled in India then a Court at Dubai is not a court with competent jurisdiction\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"In a divorce petition, if both parties are domiciled in India then a Court at Dubai is not a court with competent jurisdiction | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/25\/in-a-divorce-petition-if-both-parties-are-domiciled-in-india-then-a-court-at-dubai-is-not-a-court-with-competent-jurisdiction\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"In a divorce petition, if both parties are domiciled in India then a Court at Dubai is not a court with competent jurisdiction","og_description":"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench comprising of A.S. Oka and Anuja Prabhudessai. JJ., heard an appeal filed by the appellant who","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/25\/in-a-divorce-petition-if-both-parties-are-domiciled-in-india-then-a-court-at-dubai-is-not-a-court-with-competent-jurisdiction\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-08-25T11:04:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/25\/in-a-divorce-petition-if-both-parties-are-domiciled-in-india-then-a-court-at-dubai-is-not-a-court-with-competent-jurisdiction\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/25\/in-a-divorce-petition-if-both-parties-are-domiciled-in-india-then-a-court-at-dubai-is-not-a-court-with-competent-jurisdiction\/","name":"In a divorce petition, if both parties are domiciled in India then a Court at Dubai is not a court with competent jurisdiction | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/25\/in-a-divorce-petition-if-both-parties-are-domiciled-in-india-then-a-court-at-dubai-is-not-a-court-with-competent-jurisdiction\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/25\/in-a-divorce-petition-if-both-parties-are-domiciled-in-india-then-a-court-at-dubai-is-not-a-court-with-competent-jurisdiction\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2017-08-25T11:04:56+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/25\/in-a-divorce-petition-if-both-parties-are-domiciled-in-india-then-a-court-at-dubai-is-not-a-court-with-competent-jurisdiction\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/25\/in-a-divorce-petition-if-both-parties-are-domiciled-in-india-then-a-court-at-dubai-is-not-a-court-with-competent-jurisdiction\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/25\/in-a-divorce-petition-if-both-parties-are-domiciled-in-india-then-a-court-at-dubai-is-not-a-court-with-competent-jurisdiction\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/25\/in-a-divorce-petition-if-both-parties-are-domiciled-in-india-then-a-court-at-dubai-is-not-a-court-with-competent-jurisdiction\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"In a divorce petition, if both parties are domiciled in India then a Court at Dubai is not a court with competent jurisdiction"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":237619,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/17\/del-hc-husband-citizen-and-domicile-of-usa-can-he-raise-objections-on-divorce-proceedings-filed-by-wife-in-india-court-decrypts-the-law-in-light-of-catena-of-scs-decisions\/","url_meta":{"origin":152154,"position":0},"title":"Del HC | Husband citizen and domicile of USA, Can he raise objections on divorce proceedings filed by wife in India? Court decrypts the law in light of catena of SC&#8217;s decisions","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Hima Kohli and Subramonium Prasad, JJ., while observing a matrimonial application, observed that, The plaint must be read as a whole to determine as to whether it discloses a cause of action. In the instant matter, the husband\/appellant sought to challenge the Order passed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":254142,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/14\/irretrievable-breakdown-of-marriage\/","url_meta":{"origin":152154,"position":1},"title":"Irretrievable breakdown of marriage: SC invokes Art. 142 to dissolve marriage which never took off from first day and parties living separately for almost 20 yrs","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 14, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: While deciding a case of a matrimonial dispute where the marriage never took off from the first day and was never consummated and the parties had been living separately from the date of marriage for almost 20 years, a Division Bench of Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hrishikesh Roy,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6731,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/07\/serious-and-unsubstantiated-allegations-of-adultery-amount-to-cruelty-offering-a-ground-for-divorce\/","url_meta":{"origin":152154,"position":2},"title":"Serious and unsubstantiated allegations of adultery amount to cruelty offering a ground for divorce","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 7, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court- While deciding the present divorce matter wherein repeated false and frivolous allegation of adultery were made by the appellant wife against the respondent husband, a bench of Sanjay Karol, J., held that the said allegations were made out of vengeance and were unverified and unsubstantiated. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Courts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":196949,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/13\/divorce-granted-on-ground-of-cruelty-in-absence-of-rebuttal-evidence-by-the-husband\/","url_meta":{"origin":152154,"position":3},"title":"Divorce granted on ground of cruelty in absence of rebuttal evidence by the husband","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 13, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Division Bench comprising of M.M.S. Bedi and Hari Pal Verma, JJ. allowed an appeal filed by the wife against the judgment of the family court, which declined her petition for divorce. The appellant claimed that her husband was addicted to the vice of drinking,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":274508,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/26\/evidence-not-adduced-maintenance-application-not-decided-bombay-high-court-remands-divorce-matter-to-family-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":152154,"position":4},"title":"Evidence not adduced; Maintenance application not decided: Bombay High Court remands divorce matter to Family Court","author":"Editor","date":"September 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Bombay High Court: In a case filed by a wife (\u2018appellant') challenging the Family Court order that granted decree of divorce without giving her opportunity to adduce evidence and without deciding her interim application for maintenance, a Division Bench of A S Chandurkar and Urmila Joshi Phalke, JJ.,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216571,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/utt-hc-instances-of-cruelty-not-taken-in-isolation-but-cumulative-effect-thereof-considered-divorce-petition-rejected\/","url_meta":{"origin":152154,"position":5},"title":"Utt HC | Instances of cruelty not taken in isolation but cumulative effect thereof considered; divorce petition rejected\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 6, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court:\u00a0The Division Bench of Alok Singh and Ravindra Maithani, JJ. contemplated the present appeal filed by the appellant-husband, where the order passed by the Family Court dismissing a suit for divorce was challenged.\u00a0 Factual matrix of the appeal was that marriage was solemnized between the parties in 2007.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/152154","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=152154"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/152154\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=152154"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=152154"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=152154"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}