{"id":150434,"date":"2017-08-18T13:38:14","date_gmt":"2017-08-18T08:08:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=150434"},"modified":"2017-08-18T13:38:14","modified_gmt":"2017-08-18T08:08:14","slug":"designation-as-senior-counsel-is-a-distinction-conferred-based-upon-the-opinion-of-the-court-and-cant-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/18\/designation-as-senior-counsel-is-a-distinction-conferred-based-upon-the-opinion-of-the-court-and-cant-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right\/","title":{"rendered":"Designation as Senior Counsel is a distinction conferred based upon the opinion of the Court and can\u2019t be claimed as a matter of right"},"content":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court:<\/strong> In an intra court appeal filed by an advocate, P.B. Sahasranaman, against the judgment of a Single Judge Bench dismissing the appellant\u2019s writ petition to consider the matter of his designation as senior counsel in the High Court,\u00a0 the appeal was dismissed by a Division Bench comprising of Navaniti Prasad Sigh, C.J. and Raja Vijayaraghavan V., J.<\/p>\n

After a review petition and a writ petition before the Supreme Court to consider the rejection of him being designated as a senior counsel failed, the appellant filed a writ petition before the Kerala High Court challenging the \u201cRules Regarding Designation as Senior Advocates, 2000\u201d as being ultra vires the powers granted to the High Court by the Advocates Act of 1961. Another contention was that Rule 6 of the aforementioned Rules, which stated that at least two-thirds of the Judges present at a meeting needed to support an application for designation as senior counsel, should be read as \u201ctwo-thirds of the Judges present and voting\u201d.<\/p>\n

Both the contentions were rejected by the High Court and the writ became only of academic interest since the ballot papers had been destroyed and there was no question of recounting. A question arose if an Advocate could consider it to be a matter of right to be designated as a senior advocate. The court answered it in negative and declared that it is a distinction conferred based upon the opinion of the Court considering \u201cability, standing at the Bar or special knowledge or experience in law\u201d and that \u201cit is a subjective decision based on objective consideration\u201d.<\/p>\n

Also, the Court stated that different High Courts have framed different rules with the aid of the Advocates Act and though the practice of \u201cJudges present and voting\u201d was prevalent, the usage of \u201cJudges present\u201d was held to be a conscious departure in the Kerala High Court Rules of 2000. [Adv. P.B. Sahasranaman v. Kerala High Court, Writ Appeal No. 1500 of 2017, dated 10.08.2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court: In an intra court appeal filed by an advocate, P.B. Sahasranaman, against the judgment of a Single Judge Bench <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[21414,21434,21424],"class_list":["post-150434","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-designation","tag-distinction","tag-senior-counsel"],"yoast_head":"\nDesignation as Senior Counsel is a distinction conferred based upon the opinion of the Court and can\u2019t be claimed as a matter of right | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/18\/designation-as-senior-counsel-is-a-distinction-conferred-based-upon-the-opinion-of-the-court-and-cant-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Designation as Senior Counsel is a distinction conferred based upon the opinion of the Court and can\u2019t be claimed as a matter of right\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court: In an intra court appeal filed by an advocate, P.B. Sahasranaman, against the judgment of a Single Judge Bench\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/18\/designation-as-senior-counsel-is-a-distinction-conferred-based-upon-the-opinion-of-the-court-and-cant-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-08-18T08:08:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/18\/designation-as-senior-counsel-is-a-distinction-conferred-based-upon-the-opinion-of-the-court-and-cant-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/18\/designation-as-senior-counsel-is-a-distinction-conferred-based-upon-the-opinion-of-the-court-and-cant-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right\/\",\"name\":\"Designation as Senior Counsel is a distinction conferred based upon the opinion of the Court and can\u2019t be claimed as a matter of right | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-08-18T08:08:14+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/18\/designation-as-senior-counsel-is-a-distinction-conferred-based-upon-the-opinion-of-the-court-and-cant-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/18\/designation-as-senior-counsel-is-a-distinction-conferred-based-upon-the-opinion-of-the-court-and-cant-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/18\/designation-as-senior-counsel-is-a-distinction-conferred-based-upon-the-opinion-of-the-court-and-cant-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Designation as Senior Counsel is a distinction conferred based upon the opinion of the Court and can\u2019t be claimed as a matter of right\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Designation as Senior Counsel is a distinction conferred based upon the opinion of the Court and can\u2019t be claimed as a matter of right | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/18\/designation-as-senior-counsel-is-a-distinction-conferred-based-upon-the-opinion-of-the-court-and-cant-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Designation as Senior Counsel is a distinction conferred based upon the opinion of the Court and can\u2019t be claimed as a matter of right","og_description":"Kerala High Court: In an intra court appeal filed by an advocate, P.B. Sahasranaman, against the judgment of a Single Judge Bench","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/18\/designation-as-senior-counsel-is-a-distinction-conferred-based-upon-the-opinion-of-the-court-and-cant-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-08-18T08:08:14+00:00","author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/18\/designation-as-senior-counsel-is-a-distinction-conferred-based-upon-the-opinion-of-the-court-and-cant-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/18\/designation-as-senior-counsel-is-a-distinction-conferred-based-upon-the-opinion-of-the-court-and-cant-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right\/","name":"Designation as Senior Counsel is a distinction conferred based upon the opinion of the Court and can\u2019t be claimed as a matter of right | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-08-18T08:08:14+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/18\/designation-as-senior-counsel-is-a-distinction-conferred-based-upon-the-opinion-of-the-court-and-cant-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/18\/designation-as-senior-counsel-is-a-distinction-conferred-based-upon-the-opinion-of-the-court-and-cant-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/18\/designation-as-senior-counsel-is-a-distinction-conferred-based-upon-the-opinion-of-the-court-and-cant-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Designation as Senior Counsel is a distinction conferred based upon the opinion of the Court and can\u2019t be claimed as a matter of right"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":115531,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/22\/matter-relating-to-designation-of-senior-advocates-in-the-supreme-court-referred-to-larger-bench\/","url_meta":{"origin":150434,"position":0},"title":"Matter relating to designation of Senior Advocates in the Supreme Court referred to larger bench","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 22, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Bench of Ranjan Gogoi and Navin Sinha, JJ referred the matter relating to framing of guidelines for designation of practicing Advocates as designated Senior Advocate(s) in the Supreme Court to a larger bench. Noticing that the decision of this Court on the said issues may have effect\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280673,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/30\/madras-high-court-designating-an-advocate-as-a-senior-advocate-is-a-matter-of-honour-and-privilege-conferred-upon-a-member-of-the-bar-and-cannot-be-based-on-reservation-leg\/","url_meta":{"origin":150434,"position":1},"title":"Madras High Court dismisses petition seeking equal status to atleast 30% women advocates seeking conferment of Senior Advocate","author":"Editor","date":"December 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: In a writ petition filed for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to give the equal status to atleast 30% of women amongst the advocates seeking conferment of Senior Advocate status from the lists issued by the Permanent Secretariat for Designation of Senior Advocate (\u2018PSDSA\u2019)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Madras-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":296055,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/05\/madras-hc-stays-single-judges-order-directing-madras-bar-association-rs-5-lakh-discriminating-non-member\/","url_meta":{"origin":150434,"position":2},"title":"Read why Madras High Court stayed Single Judge’s order directing Madras Bar Association to pay Rs. 5 lakh compensation for discriminating against non-member","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court only expressed its prima facie view and final orders in the writ appeal on merits will be passed after hearing the parties in full, uninfluenced by any of the observations made in this order. Therefore, the Senior Advocate was not prevented from placing his contentions to sustain the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":235383,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/madras-hc-does-doctrine-of-merger-makes-a-distinction-between-an-order-of-reversal-modification-or-an-order-of-confirmation-hc-explains-in-a-contempt-petition\/","url_meta":{"origin":150434,"position":3},"title":"Madras HC | Does doctrine of merger make a distinction between an order of reversal, modification or an order of confirmation? HC explains in a Contempt Petition","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court:\u00a0N. Anand Venkatesh, J., while addressing the contempt petition held that, \"The doctrine of merger does not make a distinction between an order of reversal, modification or an order of confirmation.\" Petitioners Counsel, N.G.R Prasad and Sathish Parasaran, Senior Counsel on behalf of the respondent, represented the parties\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":248177,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/13\/ori-hc%e2%94%82exercise-of-suo-motu-power-by-orissa-high-court-for-designation-of-senior-advocates-ultravires-the-guidelines-laid-down-indira-jaisingh-case-power-to-add-delete-modif\/","url_meta":{"origin":150434,"position":4},"title":"Ori HC\u2502Exercise of suo motu power by Orissa High Court for designation of \u201cSenior Advocates\u201d ultravires the guidelines laid down Indira Jaising case; Power to Add\/Delete\/Modify in Rules lies only with Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"May 13, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: A Division Bench of Chitta Ranjan Dash and Pramath Patnaik JJ. held sub-rule (9) of Rule- 6 of the High Court of Orissa (Designation of Senior Advocate) Rules, 2019 as ultravires of the guidelines\/norms framed in para 73 in Indira Jaising case. The facts of the case\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":96431,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/02\/matter-relating-to-transparency-in-designation-of-senior-advocates-to-be-finally-heard-in-february-2017\/","url_meta":{"origin":150434,"position":5},"title":"Matter relating to transparency in designation of senior advocates to be finally heard in February, 2017","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 2, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the matter where the transparency in the process of designation of senior advocates was sought, the Court directed the matter to be listed in the month of February, 2017 for final hearing along with another related matter filed before the Delhi High Court. A Writ Petition (C)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/150434","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=150434"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/150434\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=150434"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=150434"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=150434"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}