{"id":149071,"date":"2017-08-09T20:45:30","date_gmt":"2017-08-09T15:15:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=149071"},"modified":"2017-08-18T14:46:31","modified_gmt":"2017-08-18T09:16:31","slug":"public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/09\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\/","title":{"rendered":"Public Servant facing Criminal Misconduct charges is not bound to furnish explanation in absence of proof"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court<\/strong>: The 3-judge bench of Dipak Misra, Amitava Roy and AM Khanwilkar, JJ held that a public servant facing charge of criminal misconduct, cannot be comprehended to furnish any explanation in absence of the proof of the allegation of being in possession by himself or through someone else, of pecuniary resources or property disproportionate to his known sources of income.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The bench held that the primary burden to bring home the charge of criminal misconduct is indubitably on the prosecution to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the public servant either himself or through anyone else had at any time during the period of his office been in possession of pecuniary resources or property disproportionate to his known sources of income and it is only on the discharge of such burden by the prosecution, if he fails to satisfactorily account for the same, he would be in law held guilty of such offence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the case where the appellant had challenged the Madhya Pradesh High Court\u2019s order convicted him under Section 13(1)(e) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 by drawing adverse inference without any conclusive proof, the Court, setting aside his conviction, said that the appellant must be given a benefit of doubt. The Court said that the prosecution, to succeed in a criminal trial, has to pitch its case beyond all reasonable doubt and lodge it in the realm of \u201cmust be true\u201d category and not rest contended by leaving it in the domain of \u201cmay be true\u201d. [Vasant Rao Guhe v. State of Madhya Pradesh, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForDocumentLink\/n59BPu13\">2017 SCC OnLine SC 893<\/a>, decided on 09.08.2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Dipak Misra, Amitava Roy and AM Khanwilkar, JJ held that a public servant facing charge of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[2703,6431,20991,20981,11061,2675],"class_list":["post-149071","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-Adverse_Inference","tag-beyond-reasonable-doubt","tag-burden-proof","tag-criminal-misconduct","tag-prosecution","tag-public_servant"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Public Servant facing Criminal Misconduct charges is not bound to furnish explanation in absence of proof | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/09\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Public Servant facing Criminal Misconduct charges is not bound to furnish explanation in absence of proof\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Dipak Misra, Amitava Roy and AM Khanwilkar, JJ held that a public servant facing charge of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/09\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-08-09T15:15:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-18T09:16:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/09\\\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/09\\\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"headline\":\"Public Servant facing Criminal Misconduct charges is not bound to furnish explanation in absence of proof\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-08-09T15:15:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-18T09:16:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/09\\\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":282,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/09\\\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/09\\\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Adverse Inference\",\"beyond reasonable doubt\",\"burden proof\",\"criminal misconduct\",\"prosecution\",\"public servant\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"Supreme Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/09\\\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/09\\\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/09\\\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\\\/\",\"name\":\"Public Servant facing Criminal Misconduct charges is not bound to furnish explanation in absence of proof | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/09\\\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/09\\\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/09\\\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-08-09T15:15:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-18T09:16:31+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/09\\\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/09\\\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/09\\\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/09\\\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/09\\\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/09\\\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Public Servant facing Criminal Misconduct charges is not bound to furnish explanation in absence of proof\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/6665f184a76dd0a4639fad050ee78a671e5bd5b4767e2cd8b57665c9461c34ed?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/6665f184a76dd0a4639fad050ee78a671e5bd5b4767e2cd8b57665c9461c34ed?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/6665f184a76dd0a4639fad050ee78a671e5bd5b4767e2cd8b57665c9461c34ed?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_3\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Public Servant facing Criminal Misconduct charges is not bound to furnish explanation in absence of proof | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/09\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Public Servant facing Criminal Misconduct charges is not bound to furnish explanation in absence of proof","og_description":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Dipak Misra, Amitava Roy and AM Khanwilkar, JJ held that a public servant facing charge of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/09\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-08-09T15:15:30+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-18T09:16:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/09\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/09\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\/"},"author":{"name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"headline":"Public Servant facing Criminal Misconduct charges is not bound to furnish explanation in absence of proof","datePublished":"2017-08-09T15:15:30+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-18T09:16:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/09\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\/"},"wordCount":282,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/09\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","keywords":["Adverse Inference","beyond reasonable doubt","burden proof","criminal misconduct","prosecution","public servant"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","Supreme Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/09\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/09\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/09\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\/","name":"Public Servant facing Criminal Misconduct charges is not bound to furnish explanation in absence of proof | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/09\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/09\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2017-08-09T15:15:30+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-18T09:16:31+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/09\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/09\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/09\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/09\/public-servant-facing-criminal-misconduct-charges-is-not-bound-to-furnish-explanation-in-absence-of-proof\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Public Servant facing Criminal Misconduct charges is not bound to furnish explanation in absence of proof"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6665f184a76dd0a4639fad050ee78a671e5bd5b4767e2cd8b57665c9461c34ed?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6665f184a76dd0a4639fad050ee78a671e5bd5b4767e2cd8b57665c9461c34ed?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6665f184a76dd0a4639fad050ee78a671e5bd5b4767e2cd8b57665c9461c34ed?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/149071","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=149071"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/149071\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=149071"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=149071"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=149071"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}