{"id":148001,"date":"2017-08-05T12:09:06","date_gmt":"2017-08-05T06:39:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=148001"},"modified":"2017-08-11T14:21:46","modified_gmt":"2017-08-11T08:51:46","slug":"circular-mandating-presence-of-priest-who-performed-the-ceremony-during-registration-of-marriage-as-a-witness-quashed-by-bombay-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/05\/circular-mandating-presence-of-priest-who-performed-the-ceremony-during-registration-of-marriage-as-a-witness-quashed-by-bombay-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Circular mandating presence of priest who performed the ceremony during registration of marriage, as a witness quashed by Bombay HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Bombay High Court:<\/strong> A Division Bench comprising of S.C. Dharmadhikari and Sangitrao S. Patil, JJ. heard a petition for quashment of circular issued by the respondent, Registrar of Marriages, appointed under the Maharashtra Regulation of Marriage Bureaus and Registration of Marriages Act, 1998 to the extent it mandates presence of priest\/purohit, who performs the ceremony to be present before the office of the Registrar of Marriage during the registration of marriage as a witness. The Bench allowed the petition and the memorandum was quashed and set aside.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">While the reason for issuing the circular was to prevent registration of fake marriages, the petitioner contended that the Act only provided for the presence of the parties and three witnesses while registration of marriage and that the priest\/purohit who performed it was not required. It would become highly difficult for the petitioner to be present for the registration of each and every marriage that he performs and also he would not be able to attend his regular functions in the temples or the other places, through which he earns his livelihood.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Even the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 leave it to the volition of the parties to take assistance of a priest in the solemnization of a marriage. Therefore, it would be difficult for the followers of certain groups or faiths who do not engage any priest in the performance of any ceremony to ensure his presence during registration. [Umesh@ Girish Arvind Pujari v. Registering Authority, Jalgaon City Municipal Corporation, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForDocumentLink\/u671BqO0\">2017 SCC OnLine Bom 7240<\/a>, decided on 01.08.2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bombay High Court: A Division Bench comprising of S.C. Dharmadhikari and Sangitrao S. Patil, JJ. heard a petition for quashment of circular <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":74381,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[20581,18911],"class_list":["post-148001","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-presence-of-priest","tag-registration-of-marriage"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Circular mandating presence of priest who performed the ceremony during registration of marriage, as a witness quashed by Bombay HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/05\/circular-mandating-presence-of-priest-who-performed-the-ceremony-during-registration-of-marriage-as-a-witness-quashed-by-bombay-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Circular mandating presence of priest who performed the ceremony during registration of marriage, as a witness quashed by Bombay HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench comprising of S.C. Dharmadhikari and Sangitrao S. Patil, JJ. heard a petition for quashment of circular\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/05\/circular-mandating-presence-of-priest-who-performed-the-ceremony-during-registration-of-marriage-as-a-witness-quashed-by-bombay-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-08-05T06:39:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-11T08:51:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/05\/circular-mandating-presence-of-priest-who-performed-the-ceremony-during-registration-of-marriage-as-a-witness-quashed-by-bombay-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/05\/circular-mandating-presence-of-priest-who-performed-the-ceremony-during-registration-of-marriage-as-a-witness-quashed-by-bombay-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Circular mandating presence of priest who performed the ceremony during registration of marriage, as a witness quashed by Bombay HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/05\/circular-mandating-presence-of-priest-who-performed-the-ceremony-during-registration-of-marriage-as-a-witness-quashed-by-bombay-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/05\/circular-mandating-presence-of-priest-who-performed-the-ceremony-during-registration-of-marriage-as-a-witness-quashed-by-bombay-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-08-05T06:39:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-11T08:51:46+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/05\/circular-mandating-presence-of-priest-who-performed-the-ceremony-during-registration-of-marriage-as-a-witness-quashed-by-bombay-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/05\/circular-mandating-presence-of-priest-who-performed-the-ceremony-during-registration-of-marriage-as-a-witness-quashed-by-bombay-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/05\/circular-mandating-presence-of-priest-who-performed-the-ceremony-during-registration-of-marriage-as-a-witness-quashed-by-bombay-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/05\/circular-mandating-presence-of-priest-who-performed-the-ceremony-during-registration-of-marriage-as-a-witness-quashed-by-bombay-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Circular mandating presence of priest who performed the ceremony during registration of marriage, as a witness quashed by Bombay HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Circular mandating presence of priest who performed the ceremony during registration of marriage, as a witness quashed by Bombay HC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/05\/circular-mandating-presence-of-priest-who-performed-the-ceremony-during-registration-of-marriage-as-a-witness-quashed-by-bombay-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Circular mandating presence of priest who performed the ceremony during registration of marriage, as a witness quashed by Bombay HC","og_description":"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench comprising of S.C. Dharmadhikari and Sangitrao S. Patil, JJ. heard a petition for quashment of circular","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/05\/circular-mandating-presence-of-priest-who-performed-the-ceremony-during-registration-of-marriage-as-a-witness-quashed-by-bombay-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-08-05T06:39:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-11T08:51:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/05\/circular-mandating-presence-of-priest-who-performed-the-ceremony-during-registration-of-marriage-as-a-witness-quashed-by-bombay-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/05\/circular-mandating-presence-of-priest-who-performed-the-ceremony-during-registration-of-marriage-as-a-witness-quashed-by-bombay-hc\/","name":"Circular mandating presence of priest who performed the ceremony during registration of marriage, as a witness quashed by Bombay HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/05\/circular-mandating-presence-of-priest-who-performed-the-ceremony-during-registration-of-marriage-as-a-witness-quashed-by-bombay-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/05\/circular-mandating-presence-of-priest-who-performed-the-ceremony-during-registration-of-marriage-as-a-witness-quashed-by-bombay-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2017-08-05T06:39:06+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-11T08:51:46+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/05\/circular-mandating-presence-of-priest-who-performed-the-ceremony-during-registration-of-marriage-as-a-witness-quashed-by-bombay-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/05\/circular-mandating-presence-of-priest-who-performed-the-ceremony-during-registration-of-marriage-as-a-witness-quashed-by-bombay-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/05\/circular-mandating-presence-of-priest-who-performed-the-ceremony-during-registration-of-marriage-as-a-witness-quashed-by-bombay-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/05\/circular-mandating-presence-of-priest-who-performed-the-ceremony-during-registration-of-marriage-as-a-witness-quashed-by-bombay-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Circular mandating presence of priest who performed the ceremony during registration of marriage, as a witness quashed by Bombay HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":275615,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/14\/keral-high-court-writ-petition-marriage-registration-kerala-registration-of-marriages-rules-2008-secularism-legal-research-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":148001,"position":0},"title":"Kerala High Court | \u2018Solemnisation of marriage\u2019 is the consideration for registering marriages under the Kerala Registration of Marriages Rules and not \u2018religion of the parties\u2019","author":"Editor","date":"October 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Kerala High Court: In a writ petition filed being aggrieved by the refusal of registration of marriage by the Registrar as per the Kerala Registration of Marriages Rules, 2008 (\u2018Rules 2008\u2019) as the parties belong to different religions, P.V. Kunhikrishnan, J. has observed that the only condition for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":333683,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/23\/multiple-marriage-registrations-by-muslim-male-allowed-under-maharashtra-regulation-of-marriage-bureaus-and-registration-of-marriages-act-1998-bomhc\/","url_meta":{"origin":148001,"position":1},"title":"Multiple marriage registrations by a Muslim male allowed under Maharashtra Regulation of Marriage Bureaus and Registration of Marriages Act, 1998: Bombay High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"October 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Section 7(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Regulation of Marriage Bureaus and Registration of Marriages Act, 1998 contemplates that the Registrar must ensure that the marriage between parties is performed in accordance with the personal law of the parties and under the personal laws for Muslims, they are entitled to have four\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":269473,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/02\/self-respect-marriages-can-be-performed-only-between-two-hindus-madras-high-court-upholds-denial-of-marriage-registration-of-an-inter-faith-couple\/","url_meta":{"origin":148001,"position":2},"title":"Self-respect marriages can be performed only between two Hindus; Madras High Court upholds denial of marriage registration of an inter faith couple","author":"Editor","date":"July 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: G R Swaminathan J. dismissed the petition of an inter-faith couple seeking registration of their self-respect marriage on the ground that Section 7 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 dealing with such marriages can have no application as both are not Hindus. The petitioner, who is a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":254401,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/18\/amendments-to-rajasthan-compulsory-registration-of-marriages-act-2009-passed-by-rajasthan-assembly\/","url_meta":{"origin":148001,"position":3},"title":"Amendments to Rajasthan Compulsory Registration of Marriages Act, 2009 passed by Rajasthan Assembly","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 18, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"On September 17, 2021, the Rajasthan Assembly passed the Compulsory Registration of Marriages (Amendment) Bill, 2021 in order to amend the Rajasthan Compulsory Registration of Marriages Act, 2009. Key Amendments: Section 8 relating the duty to submit memorandum has been modified. It has been substituted with the following :\u00a0 (1)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Government-of-Rajasthan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Government-of-Rajasthan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Government-of-Rajasthan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Government-of-Rajasthan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Government-of-Rajasthan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255244,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/06\/physical-presence-for-registration-of-marriage-under-delhi-compulsory-registration-of-marriage-order-2014-a-necessity\/","url_meta":{"origin":148001,"position":4},"title":"Physical Presence v. Video Conference | Physical Presence for registration of marriage under Delhi (Compulsory Registration of Marriage) Order, 2014, a necessity? Delhi HC decides","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 6, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: While addressing a request for registration of marriage without requiring the physical presence of the couple, Rekha Palli, J., expressed that, \u201cIn a little over half a decade, since the Registration Order was notified, the universe has undergone a sea change but the Registering Authority, while exercising\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":140701,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/05\/law-commission-of-india-submits-report-no-270-recommending-compulsory-registration-of-marriages\/","url_meta":{"origin":148001,"position":5},"title":"Law Commission of India submits Report No. 270, recommending Compulsory Registration of Marriages","author":"Saba","date":"July 5, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"The Department of Legal Affairs forwarded a request received from the Legislative Department, asking the Law Commission to examine and submit a report with regard to various issues relating to compulsory registration of marriages. This Report proposes to amend the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 to include compulsory\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Law-Commission-of-India.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Law-Commission-of-India.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Law-Commission-of-India.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Law-Commission-of-India.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Law-Commission-of-India.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148001","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=148001"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148001\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=148001"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=148001"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=148001"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}