{"id":146661,"date":"2017-08-02T10:20:51","date_gmt":"2017-08-02T04:50:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=146661"},"modified":"2017-08-02T10:20:51","modified_gmt":"2017-08-02T04:50:51","slug":"pay-20-of-disputed-amount-for-stay-of-demand-at-first-appeal-stage-before-cita","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/pay-20-of-disputed-amount-for-stay-of-demand-at-first-appeal-stage-before-cita\/","title":{"rendered":"Pay 20% of disputed amount for stay of demand at first appeal stage before CIT(A)"},"content":{"rendered":"

OFFICE \u00a0MEMORANDUM<\/strong><\/p>\n

Subject:<\/strong> Partial modification of Instruction No. 1914 dated 21.3.1996 to provide for guidelines for stay of demand at the first appeal stage
\nReference:<\/strong> Board\u2019s O.M. of even number dated 29.2.2016<\/p>\n

Instruction No. 1914 dated 21.3.1996 contains guidelines issued by the Board regarding procedure to be followed for recovery of outstanding demand, including procedure for grant of stay of demand.<\/p>\n

Vide O.M. N0.404\/72\/93-ITCC dated 29.2.2016 revised guidelines were issued in partial modification of instruction No 1914, wherein inter alia, vide para 4(A) it had been laid down that in a case where the outstanding demand is disputed before CIT(A), the Assessing Officer shall grant stay of demand till disposal of first appeal on payment of 15% of the disputed demand unless the case falls in the category discussed in para\u00a0(B) there under. Similar references to the standard rate of 15% have also been made in succeeding paragraphs therein.<\/p>\n

2. The matter has been reviewed by the Board in the light of feedback received from field authorities. In view of the Board\u2019s efforts to contain over pitched assessments through several measures resulting in fairer and more reasonable assessment orders, the standard rate of 15% of the disputed demand is found to be on the lower side. Accordingly. it has been decided \u00a0that \u00a0the standard rate prescribed in O.M. dated 29.2.2016 be revised to 20% of the disputed demand, where the demand is contested before CIT(A). Thus all references to 15% of the disputed demand in the aforesaid O.M dated 29.2.2016 hereby stand modified to 20% of the disputed demand. Other guidelines contained in the O.M. dated 29.2.2016 shall remain unchanged.<\/p>\n

These modifications may be immediately brought to the notice of all officers working in\u00a0your jurisdiction for proper compliance.<\/p>\n

Central Board of Direct Taxes<\/p>\n

[F.No. 404\/72\/93-ITCC]<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

OFFICE \u00a0MEMORANDUM Subject: Partial modification of Instruction No. 1914 dated 21.3.1996 to provide for guidelines for stay of demand at the first <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1188,2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-146661","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-hot_off_the_press","category-news"],"yoast_head":"\nPay 20% of disputed amount for stay of demand at first appeal stage before CIT(A) | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/pay-20-of-disputed-amount-for-stay-of-demand-at-first-appeal-stage-before-cita\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pay 20% of disputed amount for stay of demand at first appeal stage before CIT(A)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"OFFICE \u00a0MEMORANDUM Subject: Partial modification of Instruction No. 1914 dated 21.3.1996 to provide for guidelines for stay of demand at the first\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/pay-20-of-disputed-amount-for-stay-of-demand-at-first-appeal-stage-before-cita\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-08-02T04:50:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/North-Block.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/pay-20-of-disputed-amount-for-stay-of-demand-at-first-appeal-stage-before-cita\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/pay-20-of-disputed-amount-for-stay-of-demand-at-first-appeal-stage-before-cita\/\",\"name\":\"Pay 20% of disputed amount for stay of demand at first appeal stage before CIT(A) | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-08-02T04:50:51+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/pay-20-of-disputed-amount-for-stay-of-demand-at-first-appeal-stage-before-cita\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/pay-20-of-disputed-amount-for-stay-of-demand-at-first-appeal-stage-before-cita\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/pay-20-of-disputed-amount-for-stay-of-demand-at-first-appeal-stage-before-cita\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pay 20% of disputed amount for stay of demand at first appeal stage before CIT(A)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pay 20% of disputed amount for stay of demand at first appeal stage before CIT(A) | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/pay-20-of-disputed-amount-for-stay-of-demand-at-first-appeal-stage-before-cita\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pay 20% of disputed amount for stay of demand at first appeal stage before CIT(A)","og_description":"OFFICE \u00a0MEMORANDUM Subject: Partial modification of Instruction No. 1914 dated 21.3.1996 to provide for guidelines for stay of demand at the first","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/pay-20-of-disputed-amount-for-stay-of-demand-at-first-appeal-stage-before-cita\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-08-02T04:50:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/North-Block.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/pay-20-of-disputed-amount-for-stay-of-demand-at-first-appeal-stage-before-cita\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/pay-20-of-disputed-amount-for-stay-of-demand-at-first-appeal-stage-before-cita\/","name":"Pay 20% of disputed amount for stay of demand at first appeal stage before CIT(A) | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-08-02T04:50:51+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/pay-20-of-disputed-amount-for-stay-of-demand-at-first-appeal-stage-before-cita\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/pay-20-of-disputed-amount-for-stay-of-demand-at-first-appeal-stage-before-cita\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/pay-20-of-disputed-amount-for-stay-of-demand-at-first-appeal-stage-before-cita\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pay 20% of disputed amount for stay of demand at first appeal stage before CIT(A)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":153414,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/31\/cbdt-revised-guidelines-for-stay-of-demand-before-cita-is-prospective\/","url_meta":{"origin":146661,"position":0},"title":"CBDT: Revised guidelines for stay of demand before CIT(A) is prospective","author":"Saba","date":"August 31, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"OFFICE MEMORANDUM Subject: Partial modification of Instruction No. 1914 dated 21.3.1996 to provide for guidelines for stay of demand at the first appeal stage Reference : Board\u2019s O.M. of even number dated 29.2.2016 and 31.7.2017 Vide Board\u2019s O.M. of even number dated 31.7.2017, modifications were made to O.M NO. 404\/72\/93-1TCC\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":317628,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/18\/dhc-upholds-itat-decision-denying-stay-application-recovery-demand-indian-national-congress-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":146661,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court upholds ITAT decision denying stay application for demand recovery against Indian National Congress","author":"Arunima","date":"March 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court granted the Indian National Congress the opportunity to pursue its case further by filing a fresh stay application, while also providing important clarifications regarding the interpretation of relevant guidelines and the discretion of the authorities in such matters.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":309181,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/13\/dhc-dismisses-newsclicks-plea-for-stay-on-income-tax-demand-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":146661,"position":2},"title":"‘NewsClick has a lot to answer’; Delhi High Court dismisses its plea for stay on income tax demand","author":"Simranjeet","date":"December 13, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cNewsClick\u2019s plea of financial stringency based on its balance-sheet inspires no confidence as according to the Assessing Officer the accounts have not been properly maintained.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":365794,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/05\/latest-cases-on-income-tax-laws-itr-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":146661,"position":3},"title":"Cases Reported in ITR | Latest Cases on Income Tax Laws","author":"Shikha","date":"November 5, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Explore the latest cases reported in SCC\u2019s Income Tax Reports (ITR) Volume on Appeal, Refund, Assessment, Revision, Business expenditure, Recovery of Tax, Revision, Capital or Revenue receipt, Search and Seizure, Benami Transactions and much more.","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Latest Cases on Income Tax Laws","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/tax-27.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/tax-27.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/tax-27.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/tax-27.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":307195,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/15\/corporate-debtors-early-denial-of-liability-prior-to-issuance-of-section-8-notice-shows-pre-existing-dispute-nclat-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":146661,"position":4},"title":"Corporate Debtor\u2019s early denial of liability indicates pre-existing dispute; rejection of the Section 9 application justified: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"November 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While affirming the impugned order, the NCLAT granted the appellant option to pursue proceedings as per the agreement between the parties before an appropriate forum in accordance with the law.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240927,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/18\/itat-will-the-benefit-of-cbdt-instruction-no-1916-take-away-the-benefit-of-explained-jewellery-acquired-by-an-assessee-tribunal-explains\/","url_meta":{"origin":146661,"position":5},"title":"ITAT | Will the benefit of CBDT Instruction No. 1916 take away the benefit of explained jewellery acquired by an assessee? Tribunal explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 18, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Jaipur: The Bench of Vijay Pal Rao, JM and Vikram Singh Yadav, AM, held that, the\u00a0benefit\u00a0of\u00a0CBDT Instruction No.\u00a01916\u00a0dated 11-05-1994\u00a0will not take away the benefit\u00a0of the\u00a0explained jewellery acquired by the assessee. The instant appeal was directed against the Order of CIT(A)-4, Jaipur. The assessee is an\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146661","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=146661"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146661\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=146661"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=146661"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=146661"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}