{"id":146641,"date":"2017-08-02T17:52:25","date_gmt":"2017-08-02T12:22:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=146641"},"modified":"2017-08-02T17:52:25","modified_gmt":"2017-08-02T12:22:25","slug":"delhi-high-court-upholds-decision-of-itat-while-elaborating-on-ss-145-and-80-ia-of-the-it-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/delhi-high-court-upholds-decision-of-itat-while-elaborating-on-ss-145-and-80-ia-of-the-it-act\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court upholds decision of ITAT while elaborating on Ss. 145 and 80-IA of the IT Act"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:<\/strong> A Division Bench of the High Court elaborated on Sections 80-IA and 145 of the IT Act in two appeals against a common order of the ITAT.<\/p>\n

The facts are that the assessee, who was the proprietor of M\/S Vi-John International, Delhi was engaged in the manufacturing of cosmetic goods. The assessee filed a return for Assessment Year 2006-07 declaring an income of Rs. 2,02,760. The AO, during the assessment procedure issued a questionnaire following which, the AO framed the assessment at Rs. 1,47,00,040. The AO noted that the units of the assessee located at Baddi were making an abnormally high gross profit when compared to the gross profits of units located in Delhi, these units were selling their products through another related concern of the family on a consignment basis. The AO accounted for the advantages that accrued to the units at Baddi, however, he fixed the average gross profit to 23% instead of 38.05% as declared by the assessee, consequently the net profit for deduction under Section 80-IC of the IT Act was computed at 21% and a difference was added back to the income of the assessee. In the succeeding Assessment Year 2007-08, the AO on a similar calculation added back the difference in the gross profit by taking it at a maximum of 25% instead of the reported 43.07%. The assessee approached the CIT(A) which allowed the appeal and held that the assessing officer had incorrectly calculated the gross profit rates. The Revenue went in appeal which was dismissed by the ITAT. The ITAT concluded that the AO invoked Section 80-IC read with Section 80-IA(8) and (10) \u201con the basis of conjectures and surmises only without having an iota of material on record and as such, the question is answered in favour of the assessee.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Court analysed the proviso to Section 80-IA (8) stating that the CIT(A) and ITAT were correct in not allowing the appeal. The Court held that under Section 80-IA(8) of the Act, the one of the prerequisite for the AO to not grant deduction as claimed by the assessee in his return is where the AO finds the consideration at which transfer of goods were made do not correspond to market value, further the proviso to the section states that the AO has to explain with sufficient clarity why the AO is rejecting the profit\u00a0figures as put forth by the assessee. The Court took note of the fact that outrightly rejecting the figures without giving reasonable justification on a presumption by comparing the trading results of two businesses was not correct in law. The appeals were dismissed. [Pr. Commissioner of IT v. Harpreet Kaur, 2017 SCC OnLine Del 9397<\/a>, decided on 24.07.2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: A Division Bench of the High Court elaborated on Sections 80-IA and 145 of the IT Act in two <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[20291],"class_list":["post-146641","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-sections-80-ia-and-145-of-the-it-act"],"yoast_head":"\nDelhi High Court upholds decision of ITAT while elaborating on Ss. 145 and 80-IA of the IT Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/delhi-high-court-upholds-decision-of-itat-while-elaborating-on-ss-145-and-80-ia-of-the-it-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court upholds decision of ITAT while elaborating on Ss. 145 and 80-IA of the IT Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench of the High Court elaborated on Sections 80-IA and 145 of the IT Act in two\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/delhi-high-court-upholds-decision-of-itat-while-elaborating-on-ss-145-and-80-ia-of-the-it-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-08-02T12:22:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/delhi-high-court-upholds-decision-of-itat-while-elaborating-on-ss-145-and-80-ia-of-the-it-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/delhi-high-court-upholds-decision-of-itat-while-elaborating-on-ss-145-and-80-ia-of-the-it-act\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi High Court upholds decision of ITAT while elaborating on Ss. 145 and 80-IA of the IT Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-08-02T12:22:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/delhi-high-court-upholds-decision-of-itat-while-elaborating-on-ss-145-and-80-ia-of-the-it-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/delhi-high-court-upholds-decision-of-itat-while-elaborating-on-ss-145-and-80-ia-of-the-it-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/delhi-high-court-upholds-decision-of-itat-while-elaborating-on-ss-145-and-80-ia-of-the-it-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court upholds decision of ITAT while elaborating on Ss. 145 and 80-IA of the IT Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi High Court upholds decision of ITAT while elaborating on Ss. 145 and 80-IA of the IT Act | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/delhi-high-court-upholds-decision-of-itat-while-elaborating-on-ss-145-and-80-ia-of-the-it-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court upholds decision of ITAT while elaborating on Ss. 145 and 80-IA of the IT Act","og_description":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench of the High Court elaborated on Sections 80-IA and 145 of the IT Act in two","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/delhi-high-court-upholds-decision-of-itat-while-elaborating-on-ss-145-and-80-ia-of-the-it-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-08-02T12:22:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/delhi-high-court-upholds-decision-of-itat-while-elaborating-on-ss-145-and-80-ia-of-the-it-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/delhi-high-court-upholds-decision-of-itat-while-elaborating-on-ss-145-and-80-ia-of-the-it-act\/","name":"Delhi High Court upholds decision of ITAT while elaborating on Ss. 145 and 80-IA of the IT Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-08-02T12:22:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/delhi-high-court-upholds-decision-of-itat-while-elaborating-on-ss-145-and-80-ia-of-the-it-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/delhi-high-court-upholds-decision-of-itat-while-elaborating-on-ss-145-and-80-ia-of-the-it-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/02\/delhi-high-court-upholds-decision-of-itat-while-elaborating-on-ss-145-and-80-ia-of-the-it-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court upholds decision of ITAT while elaborating on Ss. 145 and 80-IA of the IT Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":381104,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/15\/itat-delhi-invalid-time-barred-section-1432-notice-assessment-quashed\/","url_meta":{"origin":146641,"position":0},"title":"ITAT Delhi quashes assessment over invalid and time-barred Section 143(2) notice and jurisdictional defect","author":"Ekta","date":"April 15, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA notice issued under Section 143(2) beyond the prescribed limitation period and without jurisdiction strikes at the root of the assessment, rendering the entire proceedings void ab initio.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"time barred Section 143(2) notice","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/time-barred-Section-1432-notice.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/time-barred-Section-1432-notice.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/time-barred-Section-1432-notice.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/time-barred-Section-1432-notice.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":320130,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/16\/assessing-officer-to-record-dissatisfaction-cogent-reasons-for-correctness-claim-assessee-bombay-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":146641,"position":1},"title":"Assessing Officer to record dissatisfaction with correctness of claim of Assessee in respect of expenditure with cogent reasons: Bombay HC","author":"Editor","date":"April 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court dismissed an appeal of Income Tax Commissioner to disallow expenditure amounting to 94 Crore u\/s 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":358002,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/27\/bhc-on-treating-income-from-same-source-differently\/","url_meta":{"origin":146641,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Defeats the ends of justice\u2019; Bombay HC sets aside ITAT\u2019s order treating income from same source differently for different assessment years","author":"Editor","date":"August 27, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"For the purposes of Income Tax Act, 1961, the business which is involved in letting out premises on hire, would be said to have commenced right from the stage of repairing and furnishing of property for being rented out and cannot be treated as commenced only when the premises are\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"treating income from same source differently","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/treating-income-from-same-source-differently.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/treating-income-from-same-source-differently.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/treating-income-from-same-source-differently.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/treating-income-from-same-source-differently.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":364399,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/21\/itat-quashes-reassessment-notice-barred-by-limitation-s-148\/","url_meta":{"origin":146641,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Escaped income is below Rs 50 lakhs\u2019; ITAT quashes reassessment notice under S.148 Income Tax Act issued beyond prescribed limitation of 3 years","author":"Ekta","date":"October 21, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"A notice under Section 148-A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was issued to the assessee, stating that income had escaped assessment under the provisions of Section 147, regarding sale, purchase of properties and contractual receipts.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"reassessment notice barred by limitation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/reassessment-notice-barred-by-limitation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/reassessment-notice-barred-by-limitation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/reassessment-notice-barred-by-limitation.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/reassessment-notice-barred-by-limitation.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":198403,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/11\/penalty-under-section-2711c-of-income-tax-act-is-not-automatic-intentional-wrongdoing-by-the-assessee-has-to-be-established\/","url_meta":{"origin":146641,"position":4},"title":"Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act is not automatic, intentional wrongdoing by the assessee has to be established","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 11, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Ravindra Bhat and A.K. Chawla, JJ. dismissed Revenue\u2019s appeal holding that Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) was right in holding that the assessee was not liable to penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee, manufacturers of TV parts,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":322658,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/22\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal-quashes-reassessment-due-lack-jurisdiction\/","url_meta":{"origin":146641,"position":5},"title":"ITAT, Delhi quashes reassessment made on basis of notice issued u\/s 148 of Income Tax Act by non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer which led to addition of 12.5 lakhs","author":"Editor","date":"May 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe reassessment notice was issued by ITO, Ward 69(1), New Delhi, under Section 148 and lacked jurisdiction as the jurisdiction was with ITO, Ward 4(1), Gurgaon. Hence, the subsequent assessment completed by ITO, Ward 4(1), Gurgaon, based on this notice was legally flawed.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146641","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=146641"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146641\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=146641"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=146641"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=146641"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}