{"id":145691,"date":"2017-07-31T15:38:32","date_gmt":"2017-07-31T10:08:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=145691"},"modified":"2017-07-31T15:38:32","modified_gmt":"2017-07-31T10:08:32","slug":"2017-scc-vol-6-july-28-2017-part-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/31\/2017-scc-vol-6-july-28-2017-part-4\/","title":{"rendered":"2017 SCC Vol. 6 July 28, 2017 Part 4"},"content":{"rendered":"

H.P. Private Medical Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fixation of Fee) Act, 2006 (16 of 2006) \u2014 S. 3(6-a) \u2014 Establishment, Incorporation, Running, Closure and Nationalisation of Educational Institutions\/Universities \u2014 Right to establish and run educational institutions \u2014 Generally:<\/strong> Section 3(6a) of the Himachal Pradesh Private Medical Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fixation of Fee) Act 2006 conferring exclusive power to affiliate private medical educational institutions set up in the State to Himachal Pradesh University, struck down. [Maharishi Markandeshwar Medical College and Hospital v. State of H.P., (2017) 6 SCC 675<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Arbitration Act, 1940 \u2014 S. 30 \u2014 Award \u2014 Interference with \u2014 Whether justified:<\/strong> Award restored, when interference therewith was on an incorrect appreciation of the record\/documents. [Kamrup Industrial Gases Ltd. v. Union of India, (2017) 6 SCC 707<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Constitution of India \u2014 Arts. 19(1)(g), 6, 32, 142, 47, 245 and 246 and Sch. VII List I Entry 23 List II Entries 13 and 51:<\/strong> As liquor vends on National and State highways, are a major cause of road accidents and deaths, hence, directions issued in K. Balu, (2017) 2 SCC 281<\/a>, affirmed. However, certain modulations however permitted. [State of T.N. v. K. Balu, (2017) 6 SCC 715<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Infrastructure Laws \u2014 Water and Water Resources \u2014 Water disputes \u2014 Challenge to award of Tribunal constituted under S. 9, Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956:<\/strong> As State of Kerala agreed not to utilise more water than that allocated by award under challenge pending final decision of Supreme Court, the interim order which is in force shall continue till the appeals are decided. [State of Karnataka v. State of T.N., (2017) 6 SCC 727<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Disaster Management Act, 2005 \u2014 Implementation of:<\/strong> Directions issued for proper implementation of the Act. [Gaurav Kumar Bansal v. Union of India, (2017) 6 SCC 730<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Constitution of India \u2014 Arts. 21, 14, 38, 39 and 39-A \u2014 Deaths of farmers in Tamil Nadu \u2014 Obligation of State to take ameliorative measures to prevent:<\/strong> As deaths are due to famine and other natural causes and also due to immense financial problem, State, as guardian, is required to see how to solve these problems or to meet problems by taking curative measures treating it as a natural disaster. State standing on a position of a loco parentis to the citizens should act in a society where agriculture is of paramount importance and most farmers exclusively depend upon agriculture for sustenance. [T.N. Centre for Public Interest Litigation v. State of T.N., (2017) 6 SCC 734<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Associations, Societies and Clubs \u2014 Body discharging public functions but not amounting to State \u2014 BCCI and State Cricket Associations:<\/strong> For compliance of reform\u00a0of BCCI and State Cricket Associations, as per directions of Supreme Court, further directions issued in respect of various issues such as: (i) Interim orders on expenditure on ODIs and T-20 international matches; (ii) Constitution and functioning of Committee of Administrators; (iii) Compliance report; (iv) Nominee to attend meeting of ICC; and (v) State Cricket Associations elections. [BCCI v. Cricket Assn. of Bihar, (2017) 6 SCC 737<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 \u2014 S. 24(2) r\/w Ss. 3(r) and 3(x) \u2014 Petition seeking declaration of lapse of acquisition proceedings \u2014 Maintainability of:<\/strong> Under the 2013 Act, all persons claiming interest in compensation to be paid on account of the acquisition of land, are \u201cpersons interested\u201d. Further, amongst others, a person whose name is recorded as owner of the land or building or part thereof in the records of the authority concerned, is a \u201clandowner\u201d \u2014 Even a family residing in the lands sought to be acquired, be it an owner or not, is an \u201caffected family\u201d, and if a family or a person is affected, necessarily, he has a right to approach the court to protect his interests. Therefore, subsequent purchasers\/successors, etc., being people affected by the acquisition, have the locus standi to file the petition seeking declaration of lapse of acquisition proceedings. [Government (NCT of Delhi) v. Manav Dharam Trust, (2017) 6 SCC 751<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 \u2014 Ss. 378, 386(a) and 385 \u2014 Appeal against acquittal \u2014 Powers of appellate court \u2014 How exercisable:<\/strong> Power of appellate court to review evidence in appeals against acquittal is as extensive as its powers in appeals against convictions, but that power is with a note of caution that appellate court should be slow in interfering with orders of acquittal unless there are compelling reasons to do so. [Arun Kumar v. State of Bihar, (2017) 6 SCC 765<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 Or. 21 Rr. 64 to 68 r\/w R. 90(2) \u2014 Auction-sale of property, in course of execution proceedings \u2014 When can be set aside:<\/strong> It is not any material irregularity or fraud that alone is sufficient for setting aside of sale, but as per Or. 21 R. 90(2) CPC, judgment-debtor has to go further and establish to the satisfaction of the court that the material irregularity or fraud in conducting the sale, as the case may be, resulted in causing substantial injury to the judgment-debtor. [Chilamkurti Bala Subrahmanyam v. Samanthapudi Vijaya Lakshmi, (2017) 6 SCC 770<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 S. 100 \u2014 Second appeal:<\/strong> As directions given by High Court to dispose of second appeal with a view to meet the ends of justice and avoid any further litigation between the parties concerned, without dealing with all substantial questions of law framed by it, adequately protecting interests of either party, said disposal was proper. [Poonnamma Jagadamma v. Narayanan Nair, (2017) 6 SCC 778<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 S. 25 \u2014 Transfer petition \u2014 Factors to be considered \u2014 Civil and criminal cross-cases in matrimonial matter:<\/strong> As husband was already appearing in court to which petitioner wife sought transfer of proceedings concerned, divorce petition could be transferred to Dungarpur, Rajasthan. [Bhartiben Ravibhai Rav v. Ravibhai Govindbhai Rav, (2017) 6 SCC 785<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Constitution of India \u2014 Art. 226 \u2014 Maintainability \u2014 Delay\/Laches \u2014 Land acquisition matters \u2014 Acquisition for construction of new broad gauge railway line by invocation of urgency clause:<\/strong> As appellants were paid compensation and possession\u00a0was duly taken [hence no claim remains under S. 24(2) of 2013 Act]. Moreover, fact remains that the challenge of appellants is barred by laches and the said finding does not suffer from any infirmity. Even if appellants were permitted to lay a fresh challenge, they are required to overcome this legal bar which appellants have not been able to overcome. [Jasveer Singh v. State Of U.P., (2017) 6 SCC 787<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Penal Code, 1860 \u2014 Ss. 304-B\/34 \u2014 Dowry death \u2014 Death due to strangulation and body burnt thereafter:<\/strong> In this case incident took place in matrimonial home of deceased. Circumstantial evidence did not establish that appellant-accused, deceased victim\u2019s sister-in-law and brother-in-law, had any common intention with husband (convicted accused) of deceased in commission of crime and sufficient evidence was also present that both used to live in a different village and not with accused husband. As evidence available does not prove beyond reasonable doubt, that appellants tortured victim for any demand of dowry, hence, their conviction reversed. [Bibi Parwana Khatoon Alias Parwana Khatoon v. State of Bihar, (2017) 6 SCC 792<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Service Law \u2014 Termination of Service \u2014 Parity between co-delinquents \u2014 Conviction for offence involving moral turpitude:<\/strong> In this case conviction of similarly placed co-accused was converted to offence not falling under offences listed under instructions of State Government as involving moral turpitude, after the death of accused. However, as by the time benefit of acquittal of co-accused was pressed in service and claim was raised, accused had already expired, therefore, entitlement to benefit of acquittal of co-accused from offence involving moral turpitude, to deceased accused, will be to all benefits except payment of back wages. [State of Haryana v. Ved Kaur, (2017) 6 SCC 796<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Police \u2014 Transfer \u2014 Nature of satisfaction of Government pertaining to necessity of transfer\/displacement of Senior Police Officer from sensitive tenure-based post before completion of tenure:<\/strong> Removal\/Displacement\/Transfer of officer from sensitive tenure-based post requires serious consideration and good reasons that can be tested. Action is permitted against police officer only on basis of verifiable material and not on subjective whims and fancies of those in power i.e. it should not be mere \u201cperception\u201d or \u201cpublic expectation\u201d. Absence of any material, except expression of opinion or views formed which is make-believe \u201cprima facie satisfaction\u201d (as required by the statute), by itself, cannot take out judicial review in garb of the matter being one concerning subjective satisfaction of Government. [T.P. Senkumar v. Union of India, (2017) 6 SCC 801<\/a>]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

H.P. Private Medical Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fixation of Fee) Act, 2006 (16 of 2006) \u2014 S. 3(6-a) \u2014 Establishment, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":102451,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-145691","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases"],"yoast_head":"\n2017 SCC Vol. 6 July 28, 2017 Part 4 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/31\/2017-scc-vol-6-july-28-2017-part-4\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2017 SCC Vol. 6 July 28, 2017 Part 4\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"H.P. Private Medical Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fixation of Fee) Act, 2006 (16 of 2006) \u2014 S. 3(6-a) \u2014 Establishment,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/31\/2017-scc-vol-6-july-28-2017-part-4\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-07-31T10:08:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/31\/2017-scc-vol-6-july-28-2017-part-4\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/31\/2017-scc-vol-6-july-28-2017-part-4\/\",\"name\":\"2017 SCC Vol. 6 July 28, 2017 Part 4 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/31\/2017-scc-vol-6-july-28-2017-part-4\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/31\/2017-scc-vol-6-july-28-2017-part-4\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-07-31T10:08:32+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/31\/2017-scc-vol-6-july-28-2017-part-4\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/31\/2017-scc-vol-6-july-28-2017-part-4\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/31\/2017-scc-vol-6-july-28-2017-part-4\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/31\/2017-scc-vol-6-july-28-2017-part-4\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2017 SCC Vol. 6 July 28, 2017 Part 4\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2017 SCC Vol. 6 July 28, 2017 Part 4 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/31\/2017-scc-vol-6-july-28-2017-part-4\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2017 SCC Vol. 6 July 28, 2017 Part 4","og_description":"H.P. Private Medical Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fixation of Fee) Act, 2006 (16 of 2006) \u2014 S. 3(6-a) \u2014 Establishment,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/31\/2017-scc-vol-6-july-28-2017-part-4\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-07-31T10:08:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/31\/2017-scc-vol-6-july-28-2017-part-4\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/31\/2017-scc-vol-6-july-28-2017-part-4\/","name":"2017 SCC Vol. 6 July 28, 2017 Part 4 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/31\/2017-scc-vol-6-july-28-2017-part-4\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/31\/2017-scc-vol-6-july-28-2017-part-4\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","datePublished":"2017-07-31T10:08:32+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/31\/2017-scc-vol-6-july-28-2017-part-4\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/31\/2017-scc-vol-6-july-28-2017-part-4\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/31\/2017-scc-vol-6-july-28-2017-part-4\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/31\/2017-scc-vol-6-july-28-2017-part-4\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2017 SCC Vol. 6 July 28, 2017 Part 4"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":6712,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/07\/26\/appeals-for-regularization-of-admission-to-dental-courses-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":145691,"position":0},"title":"Appeals for regularization of admission to Dental courses, dismissed","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 26, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: In an appeal filed by the appellants for regularization of their admission to BDS course, the Division Bench comprising of Hemant Gupta and Lisa Gill, JJ., held that the admissions cannot be regularized as they had taken place in violation of the regulations provided by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "High Courts"","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":337707,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/21\/kerala-hc-holds-charitable-society-members-nazareth-pharmacy-college-to-be-public-servants-pc-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":145691,"position":1},"title":"Kerala High Court holds Charitable Society Members running Nazareth Pharmacy College to be \u2018public servants\u2019 under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988","author":"Editor","date":"December 21, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIf the \u2018State function\u2019 or \u2018public function\u2019 is discharged under a legal obligation or by a governmental or statutory direction, such \u2018State function\u2019 is treated as \u2018public duty\u2019.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":304003,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/07\/social-reservation-need-not-maintained-educational-institution-administered-managed-minorities-madras-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":145691,"position":2},"title":"Social reservations need not be maintained by Educational Institution administered and managed by Minorities: Madras High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"October 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cState Government is within its right to impose the threshold cap of admitting students from minority community to 50 percent\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":62281,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/19\/ordinance-removing-genuine-nris-from-the-quota-in-medical-colleges-quashed\/","url_meta":{"origin":145691,"position":3},"title":"Ordinance removing genuine NRIs from the quota in medical colleges, quashed","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 19, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: While dealing with the constitutionality of Gujarat Professional Medical Educational Colleges or Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fixation of Fees) (Amendment) Ordinance, 2016, the bench comprising of R. Subhash Reddy, CJ and Vipul M. Pancholi, J. quashed the Ordinance to the extent of removing genuine NRI\/NRI proper\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":302308,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/25\/dhc-directs-delhi-government-drafting-new-rules-eligibility-criteria-admissions-educational-institutions\/","url_meta":{"origin":145691,"position":4},"title":"[Delhi Quota] Delhi HC directs Government of Delhi to revisit existing rules on domicile\/permanent residency status in admissions to educational institutions","author":"Simranjeet","date":"September 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe admission rules set forth by DU and GGSIPU, prejudice students who are otherwise deeply rooted within Delhi but are penalized for circumstances beyond their control which prevented them from completing their schooling in Delhi, such as their parents\u2019 employment. To this end, there might be room for legislative refinement.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6660,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/12\/directions-issued-to-fulfill-the-shortcomings-towards-the-implementation-of-persons-with-disabilities-act-1995\/","url_meta":{"origin":145691,"position":5},"title":"Directions issued to fulfill the shortcomings towards the implementation of Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 12, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court- Taking suo motu cognizance of the letter which enumerated the difficulties faced by three blind and deaf students in the educational institutions either run by the State of Himachal Pradesh or by the H.P. Council of Child Welfare and that the provisions of Persons with Disabilities\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "High Courts"","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/145691","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=145691"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/145691\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/102451"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=145691"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=145691"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=145691"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}