{"id":143461,"date":"2017-07-21T16:50:28","date_gmt":"2017-07-21T11:20:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=143461"},"modified":"2017-07-28T12:48:29","modified_gmt":"2017-07-28T07:18:29","slug":"law-of-the-case-doctrine-which-binds-a-court-to-its-own-earlier-ruling-in-the-same-case-discussed-kerala-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/21\/law-of-the-case-doctrine-which-binds-a-court-to-its-own-earlier-ruling-in-the-same-case-discussed-kerala-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Law of the Case\u2019 doctrine which binds a Court to its own earlier ruling in the same case discussed: Kerala HC"},"content":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court:<\/strong> A Division Bench comprising of P.N. Ravindrand and Dama Seshadri Naidu, JJ. discussed the meaning, scope and applicability of the doctrine of \u201cLaw of the Case\u201d, differentiating it from res judicata, from precedents and also explaining the doctrine of merger. According to the facts of the case, the Government filed two petitions against two awards passed by an arbitrator in favor of the respondent, a contractor, in a lower court which upheld the awards.<\/p>\n

The Government then moved the High Court which partially modified the award following which, the contractor filed appeals before the Supreme Court wherein the submissions of the respondent were accepted and he was directed to file review petitions before the High Court. Another Division Bench of this High Court closed the petitions as unnecessary and directed that those may be posted for fresh hearing. The issues before the Court were whether this Court could ignore the express directions of the Supreme Court and decide a different course of adjudication; whether or not it was apt to seek clarifications from the Apex Court to resolve ambiguity; and whether this Court could ignore the \u201cLaw of the Case\u201d doctrine.<\/p>\n

The doctrine of \u201cLaw of the Case\u201d was deliberated upon by referring to various jurists and a plethora of judgments decided by the appellate courts of the country. According to the doctrine, the later action of a Court or a panel is dependent on a previous order rendered in the same case by the same or a higher Court, thereby displaying \u201cdisciplined self-consistency\u201d throughout the case. While precedents bind courts only with respect to the facts of the case, law of the case \u201cfetters a later Bench in the same case from taking a contrary stand to that taken earlier by the previous Bench.\u201d For example, interlocutory orders where no fresh facts arise cannot be reconsidered and they bind the same court in the later stages.<\/p>\n

The doctrine comes in two forms and has three exceptions. One form is the mandate rule which forestalls relitigation of matters in a trial court of matters already decided by a higher court and the other form binds a court to its own earlier ruling in the same case. The three exceptions to this not very rigid doctrine are \u201cto address new evidence; to deal with a change in controlling legal authority; and to prevent a miscarriage of justice.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the Supreme Court\u2019s setting aside the modifications made in the arbitral award by the High Court was law as per Article 141 of the Constitution and that if the Court decided to hear the matter afresh, it would amount to miscarriage of justice since the Government never challenged the High Court\u2019s judgment, while getting another opportunity to present the case again. On the other hand, revisiting the review petitions would amount to breach of the law of the case.<\/p>\n

Therefore, the Court directed either party to approach the Supreme Court to seek necessary clarification so as to ascertain what it meant. [State of Kerala v. K.K. Mathai, 2017 SCC OnLine Ker 8668<\/a>, decided on \u00a005.07.2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court: A Division Bench comprising of P.N. Ravindrand and Dama Seshadri Naidu, JJ. discussed the meaning, scope and applicability of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-143461","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"\n\u2018Law of the Case\u2019 doctrine which binds a Court to its own earlier ruling in the same case discussed: Kerala HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/21\/law-of-the-case-doctrine-which-binds-a-court-to-its-own-earlier-ruling-in-the-same-case-discussed-kerala-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Law of the Case\u2019 doctrine which binds a Court to its own earlier ruling in the same case discussed: Kerala HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court: A Division Bench comprising of P.N. Ravindrand and Dama Seshadri Naidu, JJ. discussed the meaning, scope and applicability of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/21\/law-of-the-case-doctrine-which-binds-a-court-to-its-own-earlier-ruling-in-the-same-case-discussed-kerala-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-07-21T11:20:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-07-28T07:18:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/21\/law-of-the-case-doctrine-which-binds-a-court-to-its-own-earlier-ruling-in-the-same-case-discussed-kerala-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/21\/law-of-the-case-doctrine-which-binds-a-court-to-its-own-earlier-ruling-in-the-same-case-discussed-kerala-hc\/\",\"name\":\"\u2018Law of the Case\u2019 doctrine which binds a Court to its own earlier ruling in the same case discussed: Kerala HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-07-21T11:20:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-28T07:18:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/21\/law-of-the-case-doctrine-which-binds-a-court-to-its-own-earlier-ruling-in-the-same-case-discussed-kerala-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/21\/law-of-the-case-doctrine-which-binds-a-court-to-its-own-earlier-ruling-in-the-same-case-discussed-kerala-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/21\/law-of-the-case-doctrine-which-binds-a-court-to-its-own-earlier-ruling-in-the-same-case-discussed-kerala-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Law of the Case\u2019 doctrine which binds a Court to its own earlier ruling in the same case discussed: Kerala HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u2018Law of the Case\u2019 doctrine which binds a Court to its own earlier ruling in the same case discussed: Kerala HC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/21\/law-of-the-case-doctrine-which-binds-a-court-to-its-own-earlier-ruling-in-the-same-case-discussed-kerala-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Law of the Case\u2019 doctrine which binds a Court to its own earlier ruling in the same case discussed: Kerala HC","og_description":"Kerala High Court: A Division Bench comprising of P.N. Ravindrand and Dama Seshadri Naidu, JJ. discussed the meaning, scope and applicability of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/21\/law-of-the-case-doctrine-which-binds-a-court-to-its-own-earlier-ruling-in-the-same-case-discussed-kerala-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-07-21T11:20:28+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-07-28T07:18:29+00:00","author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/21\/law-of-the-case-doctrine-which-binds-a-court-to-its-own-earlier-ruling-in-the-same-case-discussed-kerala-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/21\/law-of-the-case-doctrine-which-binds-a-court-to-its-own-earlier-ruling-in-the-same-case-discussed-kerala-hc\/","name":"\u2018Law of the Case\u2019 doctrine which binds a Court to its own earlier ruling in the same case discussed: Kerala HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-07-21T11:20:28+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-28T07:18:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/21\/law-of-the-case-doctrine-which-binds-a-court-to-its-own-earlier-ruling-in-the-same-case-discussed-kerala-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/21\/law-of-the-case-doctrine-which-binds-a-court-to-its-own-earlier-ruling-in-the-same-case-discussed-kerala-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/21\/law-of-the-case-doctrine-which-binds-a-court-to-its-own-earlier-ruling-in-the-same-case-discussed-kerala-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Law of the Case\u2019 doctrine which binds a Court to its own earlier ruling in the same case discussed: Kerala HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":378325,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/13\/mad-hc-directs-compliance-with-deepathoon-lighting-orders\/","url_meta":{"origin":143461,"position":0},"title":"Contempt jurisdiction unaffected by merger doctrine: Madras HC directs compliance with Deepathoon lighting orders","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"March 13, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cBefore law all are one and no one can claim immunity merely because they happen to hold high offices.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Deepathoon lighting orders","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Deepathoon-lighting-orders.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Deepathoon-lighting-orders.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Deepathoon-lighting-orders.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Deepathoon-lighting-orders.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":365246,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/30\/doctrine-of-merger-not-attracted-by-dismissed-slp-jk-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":143461,"position":1},"title":"Dismissal of SLP by Supreme Court with or without reasons, will not attract the Doctrine of Merger: J&K and Ladakh HC","author":"Editor","date":"October 30, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhile exercising the review jurisdiction, it must be borne in mind that review proceedings are not by way of an appeal and must strictly be confined to the scope of Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Doctrine of Merger","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/jk-86.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/jk-86.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/jk-86.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/jk-86.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":326038,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/08\/what-does-the-term-competence-under-section-24-of-cpc-refer-to-kerala-hc-explains\/","url_meta":{"origin":143461,"position":2},"title":"What does the term \u2018competence\u2019 under Section 24 of CPC refer to? Kerala HC explains","author":"Editor","date":"July 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Under Section 24 (1) of the Code, the High Court or District Court may at any stage withdraw any suit, appeal or other proceeding pending in any court subordinate to it; and transfer the same for trial or disposal to any court subordinate to it and competent to try or\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":348351,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/20\/enacshment-bank-guarantee-offered-as-security-not-payment-of-custom-duty-supreme-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":143461,"position":3},"title":"Encashment of bank guarantees offered as security cannot be treated as payment of customs duty: Supreme Court","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 20, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cUnder the scheme of the Customs Act, 1962, duty is assessed provisionally or finally whereafter an assessment order or order-in-original is passed. Post assessment order or order-in-original, the concerned importer is required to pay the assessed duty\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Encashment bank guarantees payment customs duty","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Encashment-bank-guarantees-payment-customs-duty-scaled.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Encashment-bank-guarantees-payment-customs-duty-scaled.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Encashment-bank-guarantees-payment-customs-duty-scaled.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Encashment-bank-guarantees-payment-customs-duty-scaled.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Encashment-bank-guarantees-payment-customs-duty-scaled.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Encashment-bank-guarantees-payment-customs-duty-scaled.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":304030,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/07\/delhi-hc-refusal-exercise-jurisdiction-doctrine-of-forum-conveniens-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":143461,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court refuses to exercise jurisdiction by invoking the doctrine of forum conveniens","author":"Editor","date":"October 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe issuance of the letter dated 10-05-2016 from Delhi can, at best, be said to constitute a \u2018slender part of the cause of action\u2019 and cannot be determinative of the question as to whether this Court ought to entertain the petition.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255138,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/04\/dismissal-of-slp-by-reasoned-order-would-not-attract-doctrine-of-merger-but-will-be-binding-on-all-courts-tribunals-in-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":143461,"position":5},"title":"Dismissal of SLP by reasoned order would not attract doctrine of merger but will be binding on all courts\/tribunals in India","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 4, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Explaining the doctrine of merger in case of dismissal of Special Leave Petitions (SLPs), the bench of L. Nageswara Rao and BR Gavai*, JJ has held that doctrine of merger would not attract and that it doesn\u2019t matter if the SLP has been dismissed by a non-speaking order\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/143461","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=143461"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/143461\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=143461"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=143461"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=143461"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}