{"id":141341,"date":"2017-07-08T10:17:39","date_gmt":"2017-07-08T04:47:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=141341"},"modified":"2017-08-11T14:59:27","modified_gmt":"2017-08-11T09:29:27","slug":"delhi-high-court-discusses-territorial-jurisdiction-in-defamation-cases","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-discusses-territorial-jurisdiction-in-defamation-cases\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court discusses territorial jurisdiction in defamation cases"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:<\/strong> A Single Judge Bench of Valmiki J. Mehta, J. dismissed the appeal against a lower court order of return of the plaint to be presented to the court of correct territorial jurisdiction. The appellant filed the defamation suit against the respondent which was dismissed on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction.<\/p>\n

The appellant majorly relied on two arguments. First, since the interview on which the defamatory article got published was done in Delhi therefore cause of action arose in Delhi. Second, since the head office of the appellant is in Delhi therefore the Court will have jurisdiction.<\/p>\n

The Court rejected both the arguments. With regard to the first argument, the Court said that for a suit seeking compensation for defamation, publication is a sine qua non because it is only by publication of the alleged defamatory article that it comes to the knowledge of the general public and therefore, mere interview in itself taken of the appellant\/plaintiff does not result in arising of cause of action in Delhi.<\/p>\n

With regard to the second argument, the Court relied on the apex court in the case of Patel Roadways Limited, Bombay<\/em> v. Prasad Trading Company<\/em>, \u00a0(1991) 4 SCC 270<\/a>, wherein the Court held that \u201cmerely because a corporate office or a registered office or a head office of a company is situated at a particular place the same is not sufficient to confer territorial jurisdiction if the cause of action is found to have arisen at a place where the defendant company has a branch office.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Court also observed that the appeal was a \u201cgross wastage of judicial time\u201d, and therefore dismissed the appeal with costs of Rs. 10,000 to be deposited with the website bharatkeveer.gov.in, within a period of two weeks. [Deepak Kumar v. Hindustan Media Venture Ltd., 2017 SCC OnLine Del 8970<\/a>, decided on 06\/07\/2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Valmiki J. Mehta, J. dismissed the appeal against a lower court order of return <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-141341","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"\nDelhi High Court discusses territorial jurisdiction in defamation cases | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-discusses-territorial-jurisdiction-in-defamation-cases\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court discusses territorial jurisdiction in defamation cases\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Valmiki J. Mehta, J. dismissed the appeal against a lower court order of return\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-discusses-territorial-jurisdiction-in-defamation-cases\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-07-08T04:47:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-11T09:29:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-discusses-territorial-jurisdiction-in-defamation-cases\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-discusses-territorial-jurisdiction-in-defamation-cases\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi High Court discusses territorial jurisdiction in defamation cases | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-07-08T04:47:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-11T09:29:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-discusses-territorial-jurisdiction-in-defamation-cases\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-discusses-territorial-jurisdiction-in-defamation-cases\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-discusses-territorial-jurisdiction-in-defamation-cases\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court discusses territorial jurisdiction in defamation cases\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi High Court discusses territorial jurisdiction in defamation cases | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-discusses-territorial-jurisdiction-in-defamation-cases\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court discusses territorial jurisdiction in defamation cases","og_description":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Valmiki J. Mehta, J. dismissed the appeal against a lower court order of return","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-discusses-territorial-jurisdiction-in-defamation-cases\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-07-08T04:47:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-11T09:29:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-discusses-territorial-jurisdiction-in-defamation-cases\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-discusses-territorial-jurisdiction-in-defamation-cases\/","name":"Delhi High Court discusses territorial jurisdiction in defamation cases | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-07-08T04:47:39+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-11T09:29:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-discusses-territorial-jurisdiction-in-defamation-cases\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-discusses-territorial-jurisdiction-in-defamation-cases\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/08\/delhi-high-court-discusses-territorial-jurisdiction-in-defamation-cases\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court discusses territorial jurisdiction in defamation cases"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":270702,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/27\/narrowing-the-territorial-jurisdiction-in-cyber-defamation-cases-so-that-the-net-is-not-cast-too-wide\/","url_meta":{"origin":141341,"position":0},"title":"Narrowing the Territorial Jurisdiction in Cyber Defamation Cases: So that the “Net” is not Cast too Wide","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Arjun Gaur\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-15.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-15.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-15.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-15.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-15.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":374364,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/del-hc-rejects-defamation-suit-against-netflix-series-bads-of-bollywood\/","url_meta":{"origin":141341,"position":1},"title":"Delhi HC rejects Sameer Wankhede’s defamation suit against Netflix web series Ba***ds of Bollywood for want of jurisdiction","author":"Ritu","date":"January 31, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAn unqualified application of Section 19\u2026 would defeat the object of the provision, and open the door to forum shopping, libel tourism, and luxury litigation.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Netflix series Bads of Bollywood","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Netflix-series-Bads-of-Bollywood.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Netflix-series-Bads-of-Bollywood.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Netflix-series-Bads-of-Bollywood.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Netflix-series-Bads-of-Bollywood.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":376529,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/24\/del-hc-territorial-jurisdiction-in-trademark-cases\/","url_meta":{"origin":141341,"position":2},"title":"Trademark registration, Marketing agreement execution & e-commerce availability confers Territorial Jurisdiction in infringement suit: Delhi HC","author":"Ritu","date":"February 24, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cOnce the infringing goods were available for sale, the tort of infringement, which predicates use of the infringed mark, or a mark which is deceptively similar thereto, for trade, stood committed.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"territorial jurisdiction in trademark cases","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/territorial-jurisdiction-in-trademark-cases.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/territorial-jurisdiction-in-trademark-cases.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/territorial-jurisdiction-in-trademark-cases.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/territorial-jurisdiction-in-trademark-cases.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":93191,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/19\/territorial-jurisdiction-of-that-court-arises-where-communication-of-termination-order-reaches-the-employee-i-e-legal-cause-of-action-is-completed\/","url_meta":{"origin":141341,"position":3},"title":"Territorial jurisdiction of that Court arises where communication of termination order reaches the\u00a0employee i.e. legal cause of action is completed","author":"Saba","date":"December 19, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Delhi: while deciding upon an issue with respect to maintainability of the writ petition on the ground of territorial jurisdiction of the Court, wherein the petitioner had questioned the termination of his contractual services with the respondent, the Bench comprising of Valmiki J. Mehta, J., observed that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":291137,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/03\/subramanian-swamy-defamation-case-madras-hc-gives-heads-up-to-singapore-company\/","url_meta":{"origin":141341,"position":4},"title":"Foreign company, even though fully owned by Indian Company is not amenable to jurisdiction of Indian Court: Madras High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court allowed Advantage Strategic Consulting Singapore Private Limited, a foreign company to proceed with the defamation case against renowned politician and economist Dr. Subramanian Swamy","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":194659,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/31\/arbitration-application-dismissed-on-grounds-of-territorial-jurisdiction\/","url_meta":{"origin":141341,"position":5},"title":"Arbitration application dismissed on grounds of territorial jurisdiction","author":"Saba","date":"March 31, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: An application for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, was dismissed by a Single Judge Bench comprising of Sudhanshu Dhulia, J., holding that the property in question was in Delhi and thus the present application was barred by want\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/141341","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=141341"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/141341\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=141341"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=141341"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=141341"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}