{"id":138801,"date":"2017-06-29T10:45:03","date_gmt":"2017-06-29T05:15:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=138801"},"modified":"2017-06-29T10:45:03","modified_gmt":"2017-06-29T05:15:03","slug":"google-fined-e2-42-billion-for-eu-antitrust-violations-over-google-shopping","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/29\/google-fined-e2-42-billion-for-eu-antitrust-violations-over-google-shopping\/","title":{"rendered":"Google fined \u20ac2.42 Billion for EU Antitrust violations over \u2018Google Shopping\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"content\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>European Commission:<\/strong> The European Commission fined Google \u20ac2.42 billion for abusing dominance as search engine by giving illegal advantage to own comparison shopping service. The fine is calculated taking in account the duration and gravity of the infringement and in accordance with the Commission&#8217;s 2006 Guidelines on fines.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Commission opened proceedings in November 2010, following a number of complaints by European and US competitors. Various attempts to reach a conclusion by means of commitments failed. This led to two Statement of Objections, they set out the Commission&#8217;s preliminary conclusions and a range of additional evidence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Commission investigated Google&#8217;s market position in general internet search since 2008, and found Google to be dominant in each country since 2008. The Commission noted that \u201cMarket dominance is, as such, not illegal under EU antitrust rules. However, dominant companies have a special responsibility not to abuse their powerful market position\u201d. Google has abused its market dominance in general internet search by giving a separate Google product (Google Shopping) an illegal advantage in the separate comparison shopping market. This it has done by giving prominent placement to its own comparison shopping service and demotions to rival comparison shopping services.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Commission also pointed out that the \u201cdecision does not object to the design of Google&#8217;s generic search algorithms or to demotions as such, nor to the way that Google displays or organizes its search results pages. It objects to the fact that Google has leveraged its market dominance in general internet search into a separate market, comparison shopping.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Commissioner Margrethe Vestager, in charge of competition policy, said: &#8220;Google has come up with many innovative products and services that have made a difference to our lives. That&#8217;s a good thing. But Google&#8217;s strategy for its comparison shopping service wasn&#8217;t just about attracting customers by making its product better than those of its rivals. Instead, Google abused its market dominance as a search engine by promoting its own comparison shopping service in its search results, and demoting those of competitors.\u00a0What Google has done is illegal under EU antitrust rules. It denied other companies the chance to compete on the merits and to innovate. And most importantly, it denied European consumers a genuine choice of services and the full benefits of innovation.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Under the decision, Google must stop its illegal practices concerning its own comparison shopping service within 90 days or face penalty payments of up to 5% of the average daily worldwide turnover of Alphabet, Google&#8217;s parent company.\u00a0It has to respect the simple principle of equal treatment.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>European Commission: The European Commission fined Google \u20ac2.42 billion for abusing dominance as search engine by giving illegal advantage to own comparison <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":138951,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,4631],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-138801","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-international-courts"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Google fined \u20ac2.42 Billion for EU Antitrust violations over \u2018Google Shopping\u2019 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/29\/google-fined-e2-42-billion-for-eu-antitrust-violations-over-google-shopping\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Google fined \u20ac2.42 Billion for EU Antitrust violations over \u2018Google Shopping\u2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"European Commission: The European Commission fined Google \u20ac2.42 billion for abusing dominance as search engine by giving illegal advantage to own comparison\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/29\/google-fined-e2-42-billion-for-eu-antitrust-violations-over-google-shopping\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-06-29T05:15:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/european-commission.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/29\/google-fined-e2-42-billion-for-eu-antitrust-violations-over-google-shopping\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/29\/google-fined-e2-42-billion-for-eu-antitrust-violations-over-google-shopping\/\",\"name\":\"Google fined \u20ac2.42 Billion for EU Antitrust violations over \u2018Google Shopping\u2019 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/29\/google-fined-e2-42-billion-for-eu-antitrust-violations-over-google-shopping\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/29\/google-fined-e2-42-billion-for-eu-antitrust-violations-over-google-shopping\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/european-commission.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-06-29T05:15:03+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/29\/google-fined-e2-42-billion-for-eu-antitrust-violations-over-google-shopping\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/29\/google-fined-e2-42-billion-for-eu-antitrust-violations-over-google-shopping\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/29\/google-fined-e2-42-billion-for-eu-antitrust-violations-over-google-shopping\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/european-commission.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/european-commission.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/29\/google-fined-e2-42-billion-for-eu-antitrust-violations-over-google-shopping\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Google fined \u20ac2.42 Billion for EU Antitrust violations over \u2018Google Shopping\u2019\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Google fined \u20ac2.42 Billion for EU Antitrust violations over \u2018Google Shopping\u2019 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/29\/google-fined-e2-42-billion-for-eu-antitrust-violations-over-google-shopping\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Google fined \u20ac2.42 Billion for EU Antitrust violations over \u2018Google Shopping\u2019","og_description":"European Commission: The European Commission fined Google \u20ac2.42 billion for abusing dominance as search engine by giving illegal advantage to own comparison","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/29\/google-fined-e2-42-billion-for-eu-antitrust-violations-over-google-shopping\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-06-29T05:15:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/european-commission.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/29\/google-fined-e2-42-billion-for-eu-antitrust-violations-over-google-shopping\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/29\/google-fined-e2-42-billion-for-eu-antitrust-violations-over-google-shopping\/","name":"Google fined \u20ac2.42 Billion for EU Antitrust violations over \u2018Google Shopping\u2019 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/29\/google-fined-e2-42-billion-for-eu-antitrust-violations-over-google-shopping\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/29\/google-fined-e2-42-billion-for-eu-antitrust-violations-over-google-shopping\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/european-commission.jpg","datePublished":"2017-06-29T05:15:03+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/29\/google-fined-e2-42-billion-for-eu-antitrust-violations-over-google-shopping\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/29\/google-fined-e2-42-billion-for-eu-antitrust-violations-over-google-shopping\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/29\/google-fined-e2-42-billion-for-eu-antitrust-violations-over-google-shopping\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/european-commission.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/european-commission.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/29\/google-fined-e2-42-billion-for-eu-antitrust-violations-over-google-shopping\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Google fined \u20ac2.42 Billion for EU Antitrust violations over \u2018Google Shopping\u2019"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/european-commission.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":198771,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/google-fined-by-the-european-union-for-breaching-anti-trust-violations\/","url_meta":{"origin":138801,"position":0},"title":"Google fined by the European Union for breaching anti-trust violations","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"As reported by media, in a recent ruling, European Union antitrust regulators have fined Google with 4.34 billion euro in order to restrict Google from using its Android mobile operating system. This move is said to cause a trade war between Brussels and Washington. EU antitrust Chief directed Google to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/european-commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/european-commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/european-commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/european-commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/european-commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":232282,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/15\/apples-tax-battle-european-unions-general-court-annuls-european-commissions-decision-regarding-irish-tax-rulings\/","url_meta":{"origin":138801,"position":1},"title":"Apple&#8217;s Tax Battle | European Union&#8217;s General Court annuls European Commission&#8217;s decision regarding Irish Tax rulings","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 15, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"In 2016 the Commission adopted a decision2 concerning two tax rulings issued by the Irish tax authorities (Irish Revenue) on 29 January 1991 and 23 May 2007 in favour of Apple Sales International (ASI) and Apple Operations Europe (AOE), which were companies incorporated in Ireland but not tax resident in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/APPLE.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/APPLE.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/APPLE.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/APPLE.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/APPLE.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":26672,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/19\/the-anti-trust-saga-continues-european-commission-v-google\/","url_meta":{"origin":138801,"position":2},"title":"The Anti-trust Saga Continues: European Commission v. Google","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 19, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"By Aprajita Singh. Cite as: 2015 SCC OnLine Blog OpEd 2","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/IMG_8454.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/IMG_8454.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/IMG_8454.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/IMG_8454.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/IMG_8454.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":215615,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/12\/european-commission-prohibits-joint-venture-between-tata-steel-and-thyssenkrupp\/","url_meta":{"origin":138801,"position":3},"title":"European Commission prohibits joint venture between Tata Steel and ThyssenKrupp","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 12, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"European Commission prohibits proposed \"Joint Venture\" between, Tata Steel and ThyssenKrupp. According to the European Commission's investigation merger would have led to higher prices for steel products that are used as inputs by the packaging industry and car manufacturers. This would have harmed European competitiveness in these sectors and led\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Business News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Business News","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/business_news\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/european-commission.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/european-commission.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/european-commission.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/european-commission.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/european-commission.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280859,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/03\/reins-tighten-on-google-cci-calls-for-fair-playground\/","url_meta":{"origin":138801,"position":4},"title":"Reins Tighten on Google: CCI Calls for Fair Playground","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Sanskruti Jain* and Avnish Prakash**","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Fair Playground","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image137.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":222175,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/18\/the-odyssey-of-google-search-bias-under-the-indian-competition-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":138801,"position":5},"title":"The Odyssey of Google Search bias under the Indian Competition Law\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"by Swati Sharma\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/google.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/google.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/google.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/google.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/google.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138801","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=138801"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138801\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/138951"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=138801"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=138801"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=138801"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}