{"id":138561,"date":"2017-06-24T11:53:35","date_gmt":"2017-06-24T06:23:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=138561"},"modified":"2017-07-06T17:36:31","modified_gmt":"2017-07-06T12:06:31","slug":"cci-opines-that-singareni-collieries-company-limited-is-not-dominant","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/24\/cci-opines-that-singareni-collieries-company-limited-is-not-dominant\/","title":{"rendered":"CCI opines that Singareni Collieries Company Limited \u00a0is not dominant"},"content":{"rendered":"

Competition Commission of India:<\/strong> The Competition Commission of India (CCI) issued an order stating that SCCL is not dominant in the relevant market. Hence, no case of contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 is made out against SCCL.<\/p>\n

Karnataka Power Corporation Limited (KPCL) has filed the instant information against the SCCL challenging the various clauses of Fuel Supply Agreements entered into between them pertaining to grade slippage, sampling procedure, deemed delivery, fixed non-negotiable price of coal etc. as being abusive of its dominant position.<\/p>\n

The Commission notes that the relevant market in the present case is the \u201cproduction and sale of non-coking coal to thermal power generators in India\u201d. The statistics show that SCCL produces a meagre amount of non-coking coal in the relevant market (9.52% in 2014-2015 & 10.44% in 2015-2016). Also, SCCL is competitor to CIL and therefore SCCL is not dominant in the relevant market.<\/p>\n

The Commission views that the alleged dispute between the parties appears to be a commercial dispute involving no competition concern, the remedy would lie elsewhere and KPCL is at liberty to pursue its remedies before the appropriate forum. [In Re Karnataka Power Corporation Ltd., 2017\u00a0SCC OnLine CCI 24<\/a>, Order dated 12.06.2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Competition Commission of India: The Competition Commission of India (CCI) issued an order stating that SCCL is not dominant in the relevant <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":76441,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-138561","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies"],"yoast_head":"\nCCI opines that Singareni Collieries Company Limited \u00a0is not dominant | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/24\/cci-opines-that-singareni-collieries-company-limited-is-not-dominant\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"CCI opines that Singareni Collieries Company Limited \u00a0is not dominant\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Competition Commission of India: The Competition Commission of India (CCI) issued an order stating that SCCL is not dominant in the relevant\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/24\/cci-opines-that-singareni-collieries-company-limited-is-not-dominant\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-06-24T06:23:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-07-06T12:06:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/24\/cci-opines-that-singareni-collieries-company-limited-is-not-dominant\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/24\/cci-opines-that-singareni-collieries-company-limited-is-not-dominant\/\",\"name\":\"CCI opines that Singareni Collieries Company Limited \u00a0is not dominant | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/24\/cci-opines-that-singareni-collieries-company-limited-is-not-dominant\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/24\/cci-opines-that-singareni-collieries-company-limited-is-not-dominant\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-06-24T06:23:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-06T12:06:31+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/24\/cci-opines-that-singareni-collieries-company-limited-is-not-dominant\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/24\/cci-opines-that-singareni-collieries-company-limited-is-not-dominant\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/24\/cci-opines-that-singareni-collieries-company-limited-is-not-dominant\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg\",\"width\":1329,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/24\/cci-opines-that-singareni-collieries-company-limited-is-not-dominant\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"CCI opines that Singareni Collieries Company Limited \u00a0is not dominant\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"CCI opines that Singareni Collieries Company Limited \u00a0is not dominant | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/24\/cci-opines-that-singareni-collieries-company-limited-is-not-dominant\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"CCI opines that Singareni Collieries Company Limited \u00a0is not dominant","og_description":"Competition Commission of India: The Competition Commission of India (CCI) issued an order stating that SCCL is not dominant in the relevant","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/24\/cci-opines-that-singareni-collieries-company-limited-is-not-dominant\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-06-24T06:23:35+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-07-06T12:06:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/24\/cci-opines-that-singareni-collieries-company-limited-is-not-dominant\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/24\/cci-opines-that-singareni-collieries-company-limited-is-not-dominant\/","name":"CCI opines that Singareni Collieries Company Limited \u00a0is not dominant | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/24\/cci-opines-that-singareni-collieries-company-limited-is-not-dominant\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/24\/cci-opines-that-singareni-collieries-company-limited-is-not-dominant\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","datePublished":"2017-06-24T06:23:35+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-06T12:06:31+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/24\/cci-opines-that-singareni-collieries-company-limited-is-not-dominant\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/24\/cci-opines-that-singareni-collieries-company-limited-is-not-dominant\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/24\/cci-opines-that-singareni-collieries-company-limited-is-not-dominant\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","width":1329,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/24\/cci-opines-that-singareni-collieries-company-limited-is-not-dominant\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"CCI opines that Singareni Collieries Company Limited \u00a0is not dominant"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":116151,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/25\/penalty-imposed-against-coal-india-ltd-its-subsidiaries-for-abusing-dominant-position\/","url_meta":{"origin":138561,"position":0},"title":"Penalty imposed against Coal India Ltd. & its subsidiaries for abusing dominant position","author":"Saba","date":"March 25, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India:The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has found Coal India Limited (CIL) and its subsidiaries to be in contravention of the provisions of Section 4(2)(a)(i) of the Competition Act, 2002 for imposing unfair\/discriminatory conditions in Fuel Supply Agreements (FSAs) with the power producers for supply of non-coking\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294869,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/17\/competition-act-applies-to-coal-india-limited-psus-state-monopolies-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":138561,"position":1},"title":"Why Coal India Limited lost legal battle against CCI: Supreme Court verdict explained","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"June 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Coal India Limited and its subsidiary Western Coalfields Limited had contended that they cannot be bound by the Competition Act, 2002 as both are governed by the Coal Mines (Nationalization) Act, 1973. The Supreme Court held that the Competition Act applies to State monopolies, Government Companies and PSUs.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"coal india","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/coal-india.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/coal-india.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/coal-india.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/coal-india.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":57531,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/21\/allegations-of-abuse-of-dominant-market-position-against-coal-india-ltd-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":138561,"position":2},"title":"Allegations of abuse of dominant market position against Coal India Ltd., dismissed","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 21, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI): While observing that though Coal India Ltd. was dominant in the market of \u201cprovision of services relating to collection, preparation and transportation of coal samples in India,\u201d no entry barrier were created through the conditions of depositing of Rs 1 crore earnest money and annual\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":31581,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/04\/uber-is-not-dominant-in-services-offered-by-radio-taxis-and-yellow-taxis-in-kolkata\/","url_meta":{"origin":138561,"position":3},"title":"UBER is not dominant in services offered by radio taxis and yellow taxis in Kolkata","author":"Sucheta","date":"January 4, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI): Extending the limit on relevant product market in Kolkata in comparison to Bengaluru (OLA case), the fair competition regulator CCI closed a case filed against radio-taxi operator UBER. The informant, another radio-taxi operator in Kolkata, alleged that UBER is abusing its dominant position by adopting\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/Uber.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/Uber.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/Uber.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/Uber.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/Uber.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267693,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/dlf-is-a-dominant-enterprise-in-developing-commercial-space-in-kolkata-competition-cci-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":138561,"position":4},"title":"DLF is a dominant enterprise in developing commercial space in Kolkata? CCI analyses","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 1, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI): On finding that DLF being a new entrant in developing commercial space in Kolkata and having only one property, Commission held that the same cannot be treated as a dominant enterprise which can operate independently of competitive forces. Instant information was filed under Section 19(1)(a)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":18415,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/10\/13\/times-of-india-is-not-dominant-in-mumbai-in-the-market-for-services-of-advertisement-in-english-print-media\/","url_meta":{"origin":138561,"position":5},"title":"Times of India is not dominant in Mumbai in the market for services of advertisement in English print media","author":"Sucheta","date":"October 13, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI): Media giant Bennett Coleman\u2019s daily the Times of India\/Mumbai Times does not, for the purpose of section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, enjoy dominant position in cosmopolitan city of Mumbai in the relevant market for services of procurement of advertisement space in English print\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138561","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=138561"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138561\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/76441"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=138561"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=138561"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=138561"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}