{"id":137931,"date":"2017-06-21T12:09:45","date_gmt":"2017-06-21T06:39:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=137931"},"modified":"2017-06-21T12:09:45","modified_gmt":"2017-06-21T06:39:45","slug":"chhattisgarh-hc-enforced-the-exclusion-jurisdiction-clause-in-arbitration-agreement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/21\/chhattisgarh-hc-enforced-the-exclusion-jurisdiction-clause-in-arbitration-agreement\/","title":{"rendered":"Chhattisgarh HC enforced the exclusion jurisdiction clause in arbitration agreement"},"content":{"rendered":"

High Court of Chhattisgarh:<\/strong> In a recent judgment, a Single Bench of Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. reiterated the principle that when an \u201cexclusive jurisdiction clause is available in a contract\/agreement, the jurisdiction of Courts and Tribunals at other places have been excluded and the places mentioned in the agreement\/contract will only have the jurisdiction over the matter.\u201d<\/p>\n

The dispute revolved around the timely completion of work in a turn key contract entered between the parties. The petitioner filed a case with Respondent No. 2 seeking refund of performance security. The respondent objected the jurisdiction on the ground that as per the exclusive jurisdiction clause the valid forum was Jaipur however the case was filed and decided in Raipur.<\/p>\n

The High Court followed the judgment in Swastik Gases Private Limited<\/em> v. Indian Oil Corporation Limited,\u00a0<\/em>(2013) 9 SCC 32<\/a> wherein the Supreme Court noted that for the construction of jurisdiction clause, the maxim expressio unius est exclusio alterius<\/em> comes into play as there is nothing to indicate to the contrary. This maxim means that expression of one is the exclusion of another.<\/p>\n

The High Court allowed the writ petition and quashed the order pronounced by Respondent No. 2. [Zuberi Engineering Company v. M\/s M P Tar Products, \u00a02017 SCC OnLine Chh 578<\/a>, order pronounced on 17.05.2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

High Court of Chhattisgarh: In a recent judgment, a Single Bench of Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. reiterated the principle that when an <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[10111,18731],"class_list":["post-137931","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","tag-arbitration-agreement","tag-exclusive-jurisdiction-clause"],"yoast_head":"\nChhattisgarh HC enforced the exclusion jurisdiction clause in arbitration agreement | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/21\/chhattisgarh-hc-enforced-the-exclusion-jurisdiction-clause-in-arbitration-agreement\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chhattisgarh HC enforced the exclusion jurisdiction clause in arbitration agreement\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"High Court of Chhattisgarh: In a recent judgment, a Single Bench of Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. reiterated the principle that when an\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/21\/chhattisgarh-hc-enforced-the-exclusion-jurisdiction-clause-in-arbitration-agreement\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-06-21T06:39:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/chattisgarh_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/21\/chhattisgarh-hc-enforced-the-exclusion-jurisdiction-clause-in-arbitration-agreement\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/21\/chhattisgarh-hc-enforced-the-exclusion-jurisdiction-clause-in-arbitration-agreement\/\",\"name\":\"Chhattisgarh HC enforced the exclusion jurisdiction clause in arbitration agreement | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-06-21T06:39:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/21\/chhattisgarh-hc-enforced-the-exclusion-jurisdiction-clause-in-arbitration-agreement\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/21\/chhattisgarh-hc-enforced-the-exclusion-jurisdiction-clause-in-arbitration-agreement\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/21\/chhattisgarh-hc-enforced-the-exclusion-jurisdiction-clause-in-arbitration-agreement\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Chhattisgarh HC enforced the exclusion jurisdiction clause in arbitration agreement\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chhattisgarh HC enforced the exclusion jurisdiction clause in arbitration agreement | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/21\/chhattisgarh-hc-enforced-the-exclusion-jurisdiction-clause-in-arbitration-agreement\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Chhattisgarh HC enforced the exclusion jurisdiction clause in arbitration agreement","og_description":"High Court of Chhattisgarh: In a recent judgment, a Single Bench of Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. reiterated the principle that when an","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/21\/chhattisgarh-hc-enforced-the-exclusion-jurisdiction-clause-in-arbitration-agreement\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-06-21T06:39:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/chattisgarh_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/21\/chhattisgarh-hc-enforced-the-exclusion-jurisdiction-clause-in-arbitration-agreement\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/21\/chhattisgarh-hc-enforced-the-exclusion-jurisdiction-clause-in-arbitration-agreement\/","name":"Chhattisgarh HC enforced the exclusion jurisdiction clause in arbitration agreement | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-06-21T06:39:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/21\/chhattisgarh-hc-enforced-the-exclusion-jurisdiction-clause-in-arbitration-agreement\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/21\/chhattisgarh-hc-enforced-the-exclusion-jurisdiction-clause-in-arbitration-agreement\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/21\/chhattisgarh-hc-enforced-the-exclusion-jurisdiction-clause-in-arbitration-agreement\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Chhattisgarh HC enforced the exclusion jurisdiction clause in arbitration agreement"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":239477,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/21\/implied-exclusion-of-jurisdiction-in-arbitration\/","url_meta":{"origin":137931,"position":0},"title":"Implied Exclusion of Jurisdiction in Arbitration","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 21, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by Abhishek Sharma*","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/arbitraiton-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/arbitraiton-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/arbitraiton-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/arbitraiton-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/arbitraiton-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":210176,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/18\/ker-hc-designation-of-seat-of-arbitration-in-an-agreement-is-akin-to-an-exclusive-jurisdiction-clause\/","url_meta":{"origin":137931,"position":1},"title":"Ker HC | Designation of seat of arbitration in an agreement is akin to an exclusive jurisdiction clause","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of V. Chitambaresh and R. Narayana Pisharadi, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed against the order of District Judge refusing to entertain a petition challenging arbitral award. Appellant was a guarantor to the loan availed of by a company named Anugraha Wood Products Limited from\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":296666,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/13\/court-having-exclusive-jurisdiction-in-agreement-is-the-seat-of-arbitration-calcutta-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":137931,"position":2},"title":"Calcutta High Court resolves \u2018Seat’ versus \u2018Venue’ enigma when agreement confers \u2018exclusive jurisdiction’ upon a court other than venue","author":"Ritu","date":"July 13, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court dismissed the present petition on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":253150,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/24\/arbitration-5\/","url_meta":{"origin":137931,"position":3},"title":"J&K and Ladakh HC | \u201cSpecific mention of particular Court at particular place excludes jurisdiction of other courts\u201d, says HC while addressing syllogistic issue of \u2018venue\u2019 and \u2018seat\u2019 of arbitration","author":"Editor","date":"August 24, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court: Tashi Rabstan, J., while addressing the syllogistic issue of \u2018venue and \u2018seat\u2019 of arbitration dismissed the appeal challenging the dismissal order of District Court refusing to entertain a petition under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Bench opined that, Where\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":254766,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/27\/icadr-rules-regarding-procedure-come-into-play-only-after-arbitration-commences-before-appropriate-jurisdiction-of-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":137931,"position":4},"title":"ICADR Rules regarding procedure come into play only after arbitration commences before appropriate jurisdiction of law: Del HC summarises law on seat, venue of arbitration","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: While observing that the role of ICADR Rules shall come into play with regard to the procedure to be followed, only after the arbitration commences before the appropriate jurisdiction of law, Suresh Kumar Kait, J., reiterated the observation of BGS SGS SOMA JV v. NHPC, (2020) 4\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":282379,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/24\/delhi-high-court-rules-reiterates-former-clause-to-prevail-over-latter-in-case-of-inconsistency-between-arbitration-clauses-in-an-agreement-legalnews-legalresearch-legalawareness\/","url_meta":{"origin":137931,"position":5},"title":"[Arbitration Agreement] Delhi High Court reiterates the law of interpretation with respect to two inconsistent clauses of a same instrument\/document\/deed","author":"Editor","date":"January 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Where there exists any iota of inconsistency between two provisions of a same instrument, the former clause shall prevail over the latter one","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/137931","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=137931"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/137931\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=137931"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=137931"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=137931"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}