{"id":137461,"date":"2017-06-20T10:05:33","date_gmt":"2017-06-20T04:35:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=137461"},"modified":"2017-06-20T10:05:33","modified_gmt":"2017-06-20T04:35:33","slug":"validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/20\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Validity of S. 28(A) of Maharashtra Civil Courts Act, 1869 upheld by Bombay HC"},"content":{"rendered":"

High Court of Bombay:<\/strong> In a recent judgment, a Bench comprising S.C.Dharmadhikari and Prakash D. Naik, JJ. upheld the vires of Section 28A(1) of the Maharashtra Civil Courts Act, 1869.<\/p>\n

The Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division Kolhapur had referred the question involving the issue of validity of Section 28 A(1) of the Act of 1869 with respect to Sections 265,<\/a>\u00a0 272<\/a>, \u00a0286<\/a> and 295<\/a> of the Succession Act, 1925, under Section 113<\/a> of the Civil Procedure Code.While disposing a miscellaneous civil application, the question of validity and operative nature of the section arose.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the Judge had already assumed his view to be correct and had referred the question to affirm his view, which was contrary to Section 113 of the Code. The Advocate General brought it to the notice of the Court that the issue had been dealt with, in the case of \u00a0Nola Janathan Ranbhise<\/em> v. Union of India<\/em> and that the Civil Judge had acted erroneously in referring the issue before the Court. In furtherance, he submitted that the power of the District Judge under the Succession Act was invested in the Civil Judges by the Court. The difference between “investment of power” and “delegation of power” was brought forth by the Advocate General to clarify his submission that the District Judge may exercise his power as a judge of original jurisdiction and not as a delegate of District Judge.<\/p>\n

The Court, in its observation said that Section 28(A) of the Act of 1869 and Sections 265, 272, 286 and 295 of Act of 1925 were consistent with each other and the Civil Judge’s opinion was erroneous. The civil reference was disposed of. [P.P.Sharma (Reference forwarded from 7th<\/sup> Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kolhapur), 2017 SCC OnLine Bom 2403<\/a>, delivered on 05-05-2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

High Court of Bombay: In a recent judgment, a Bench comprising S.C.Dharmadhikari and Prakash D. Naik, JJ. upheld the vires of Section <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":74381,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[18601],"class_list":["post-137461","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-maharashtra-civil-courts-act"],"yoast_head":"\nValidity of S. 28(A) of Maharashtra Civil Courts Act, 1869 upheld by Bombay HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/20\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Validity of S. 28(A) of Maharashtra Civil Courts Act, 1869 upheld by Bombay HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"High Court of Bombay: In a recent judgment, a Bench comprising S.C.Dharmadhikari and Prakash D. Naik, JJ. upheld the vires of Section\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/20\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-06-20T04:35:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/06\\\/20\\\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/06\\\/20\\\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Saba\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"headline\":\"Validity of S. 28(A) of Maharashtra Civil Courts Act, 1869 upheld by Bombay HC\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-06-20T04:35:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/06\\\/20\\\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":299,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/06\\\/20\\\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Maharashtra Civil Courts Act\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/06\\\/20\\\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/06\\\/20\\\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/06\\\/20\\\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\\\/\",\"name\":\"Validity of S. 28(A) of Maharashtra Civil Courts Act, 1869 upheld by Bombay HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/06\\\/20\\\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/06\\\/20\\\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-06-20T04:35:33+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/06\\\/20\\\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/06\\\/20\\\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/06\\\/20\\\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/06\\\/20\\\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Validity of S. 28(A) of Maharashtra Civil Courts Act, 1869 upheld by Bombay HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_2\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Validity of S. 28(A) of Maharashtra Civil Courts Act, 1869 upheld by Bombay HC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/20\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Validity of S. 28(A) of Maharashtra Civil Courts Act, 1869 upheld by Bombay HC","og_description":"High Court of Bombay: In a recent judgment, a Bench comprising S.C.Dharmadhikari and Prakash D. Naik, JJ. upheld the vires of Section","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/20\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-06-20T04:35:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/20\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/20\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\/"},"author":{"name":"Saba","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"headline":"Validity of S. 28(A) of Maharashtra Civil Courts Act, 1869 upheld by Bombay HC","datePublished":"2017-06-20T04:35:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/20\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\/"},"wordCount":299,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/20\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","keywords":["Maharashtra Civil Courts Act"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/20\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/20\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/20\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\/","name":"Validity of S. 28(A) of Maharashtra Civil Courts Act, 1869 upheld by Bombay HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/20\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/20\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2017-06-20T04:35:33+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/20\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/20\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/20\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/20\/validity-of-s-28a-of-maharashtra-civil-courts-act-1869-upheld-by-bombay-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Validity of S. 28(A) of Maharashtra Civil Courts Act, 1869 upheld by Bombay HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":255099,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/02\/explained-a-very-strange-provision-section-85a-of-the-maharashtra-tenancy-and-agricultural-lands-act-1948\/","url_meta":{"origin":137461,"position":0},"title":"Explained| “A very strange provision”: Section 85A of the\u00a0Maharashtra\u00a0Tenancy\u00a0and\u00a0Agricultural\u00a0Lands Act,\u00a01948","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of Hemant Gupta and V. Ramasubramanian, JJ has explained the scope of a \u201cvery strange provision\u201d under Section 85A of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 and has held that \u201cThough Section 85(2) mandates that no order of the\u00a0 Mamlatdar, the Tribunal, the Collector\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":78681,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/17\/national-green-tribunal-does-not-posses-the-power-to-adjudicate-upon-the-vires-or-validity-of-any-statuary-enactment\/","url_meta":{"origin":137461,"position":1},"title":"National Green Tribunal does not posses the power to adjudicate upon the vires or validity of any statutory enactment","author":"Saba","date":"October 17, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Bombay: While examining the scope of jurisdiction of the National Green Tribunal, the Division Bench comprising of B.P. Dharmadhikari and A.S. Chandurkar, JJ., held that the National Green Tribunal\u00a0 has the power to adjudicate only on civil matters wherein substantial question relating to environment is involved and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":46361,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/09\/constitutional-validity-of-sections-5d-and-9b-of-maharashtra-animal-preservation-act-struck-down\/","url_meta":{"origin":137461,"position":2},"title":"Constitutional validity of Sections 5D and 9B of Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act, struck down","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 9, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Deciding a petition challenging various provisions of Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act 1976 as amended by Maharashtra\u00a0 Preservation Act 1995, a bench consisting A.S. Oka and S.C. Gupte, J.J., struck down two amendments of\u00a0 Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act 1976 and upheld the constitutional validity of rest of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":277686,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/18\/can-officers-under-maharashtra-money-lending-act-2014-pass-orders-contrary-to-decree-of-a-civil-court-bombay-high-court-decides\/","url_meta":{"origin":137461,"position":3},"title":"Can officers under Maharashtra Money Lending Act, 2014 pass orders contrary to decree of a Civil Court? Bombay High Court decides","author":"Editor","date":"November 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Bombay High Court: In a unique case where the officers exercising powers under the Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014 have effectively sought to ignore the order passed by the Civil Court deciding the very same issue, Sandeep V. Marne, J. held that orders passed by the authorities\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":257308,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/19\/explained-scope-of-civil-courts-jurisdiction-despite-bar-under-section-25-of-punjab-security-of-land-tenures-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":137461,"position":4},"title":"Explained| Scope of Civil Court’s jurisdiction despite bar under Section 25 of Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 19, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Deciding the ambit of the bar of jurisdiction under Section 25 of the Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953 and whether the bar will operate, even in a situation, where the landlord-tenant relationship is disputed in a proceeding under Section 14A of the Act, the bench of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":46591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/10\/state-governments-may-establish-new-courts-only-after-consultation-with-high-courts\/","url_meta":{"origin":137461,"position":5},"title":"State Governments may establish new courts only after consultation with High Courts","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 10, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Deciding on the issue of the primacy of powers to establish the courts of Additional Districts Judge and Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division and what considerations should be taken into account for establishing such courts, the bench comprising of C.V. Oka & C.V Bhandang, JJ., observed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/137461","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=137461"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/137461\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=137461"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=137461"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=137461"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}