{"id":134901,"date":"2017-06-01T15:03:27","date_gmt":"2017-06-01T09:33:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=134901"},"modified":"2017-06-01T15:29:48","modified_gmt":"2017-06-01T09:59:48","slug":"foreign-nationals-have-no-right-to-stay-in-india-beyond-the-authorised-period","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/01\/foreign-nationals-have-no-right-to-stay-in-india-beyond-the-authorised-period\/","title":{"rendered":"Foreign Nationals have no right to stay in India, beyond the authorised period"},"content":{"rendered":"

High Court of Himachal Pradesh:<\/strong> The Bench comprising of Sanjay Karol, Acting CJ and Sandeep Sharma. J, held that in circumstances where a foreign national, whose application for extension of visa has been rejected, has no right to endlessly stay in India, except under the procedure established by law.<\/p>\n

The petitioner’s application for the further extension of visa was rejected by the Ministry of Home Affairs, after granting an extension for an year and eight months. The High Court observed that there is no rule which prescribes automatic extension of visa and no law authorizes a foreigner to remain on the soil of this country any moment longer than the period so authorized, in accordance with law, be it for whatever purpose. The Court relied upon statutory provisions under the Foreigners Act, 1946, the Foreigners Order, 1948; the Registration of Foreigners Act, 1939; and the Registration of Foreigners Rules, 1992, authoritative books on International Law and existing case laws of Sarbananda Sonowal<\/em>\u00a0 v. Union of India,<\/em> (2005) 5 SCC 665<\/a> and Louis De Raedt<\/em> v. Union of India,<\/em> (1991) 3 SCC 554<\/a> to reach its verdict.<\/p>\n

The learned counsel for the petitioner referred to the decisions rendered by the Supreme Court to establish his right of continuing to stay in India. The Court noted that these decisions were not applicable to the case present before them. Further, the petitioner’s contention to continue his stay in India for taking care of an allegedly ailing citizen of India,of whom he claims to be the adoptive father, was dismissed for the lack of evidence. Considering the facts of the case and lack of merit in the writ petition, the case was accordingly dismissed.<\/p>\n

The Court held that neither the Constitution nor any statute allows a foreigner to remain in India beyond the authorized period, except under the procedure established by law, be it for whatever purpose. [M. Alexander v. Union of India, 2017 SCC OnLine HP 668<\/a>, decided on 17.05.2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

High Court of Himachal Pradesh: The Bench comprising of Sanjay Karol, Acting CJ and Sandeep Sharma. J, held that in circumstances where <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":222107,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[18191,18181,18201],"class_list":["post-134901","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-extension-of-visa","tag-foreign-national","tag-foreigners-act"],"yoast_head":"\nForeign Nationals have no right to stay in India, beyond the authorised period | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/01\/foreign-nationals-have-no-right-to-stay-in-india-beyond-the-authorised-period\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Foreign Nationals have no right to stay in India, beyond the authorised period\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"High Court of Himachal Pradesh: The Bench comprising of Sanjay Karol, Acting CJ and Sandeep Sharma. J, held that in circumstances where\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/01\/foreign-nationals-have-no-right-to-stay-in-india-beyond-the-authorised-period\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-06-01T09:33:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-06-01T09:59:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/01\/foreign-nationals-have-no-right-to-stay-in-india-beyond-the-authorised-period\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/01\/foreign-nationals-have-no-right-to-stay-in-india-beyond-the-authorised-period\/\",\"name\":\"Foreign Nationals have no right to stay in India, beyond the authorised period | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/01\/foreign-nationals-have-no-right-to-stay-in-india-beyond-the-authorised-period\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/01\/foreign-nationals-have-no-right-to-stay-in-india-beyond-the-authorised-period\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-06-01T09:33:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-01T09:59:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/01\/foreign-nationals-have-no-right-to-stay-in-india-beyond-the-authorised-period\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/01\/foreign-nationals-have-no-right-to-stay-in-india-beyond-the-authorised-period\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/01\/foreign-nationals-have-no-right-to-stay-in-india-beyond-the-authorised-period\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/01\/foreign-nationals-have-no-right-to-stay-in-india-beyond-the-authorised-period\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Foreign Nationals have no right to stay in India, beyond the authorised period\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Foreign Nationals have no right to stay in India, beyond the authorised period | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/01\/foreign-nationals-have-no-right-to-stay-in-india-beyond-the-authorised-period\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Foreign Nationals have no right to stay in India, beyond the authorised period","og_description":"High Court of Himachal Pradesh: The Bench comprising of Sanjay Karol, Acting CJ and Sandeep Sharma. J, held that in circumstances where","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/01\/foreign-nationals-have-no-right-to-stay-in-india-beyond-the-authorised-period\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-06-01T09:33:27+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-06-01T09:59:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/01\/foreign-nationals-have-no-right-to-stay-in-india-beyond-the-authorised-period\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/01\/foreign-nationals-have-no-right-to-stay-in-india-beyond-the-authorised-period\/","name":"Foreign Nationals have no right to stay in India, beyond the authorised period | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/01\/foreign-nationals-have-no-right-to-stay-in-india-beyond-the-authorised-period\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/01\/foreign-nationals-have-no-right-to-stay-in-india-beyond-the-authorised-period\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","datePublished":"2017-06-01T09:33:27+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-01T09:59:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/01\/foreign-nationals-have-no-right-to-stay-in-india-beyond-the-authorised-period\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/01\/foreign-nationals-have-no-right-to-stay-in-india-beyond-the-authorised-period\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/01\/foreign-nationals-have-no-right-to-stay-in-india-beyond-the-authorised-period\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/01\/foreign-nationals-have-no-right-to-stay-in-india-beyond-the-authorised-period\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Foreign Nationals have no right to stay in India, beyond the authorised period"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":379942,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/01\/jk-hc-orders-retrieval-of-individual-forcibly-deported-to-pakistan\/","url_meta":{"origin":134901,"position":0},"title":"Emphasising sacrosanct human values and rights, J&K and Ladakh HC orders retrieval of minor forcibly deported to Pakistan","author":"Sunaina","date":"April 1, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAfter the mother\u2019s death due to a fatal illness, the minor continued to reside in India with his father and repeated applications were submitted to the authorities seeking extension of the child\u2019s stay and grant of Indian citizenship on compassionate grounds. However, neither was the minor declared an Indian citizen\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"forcibly deported to Pakistan","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/forcibly-deported-to-Pakistan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/forcibly-deported-to-Pakistan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/forcibly-deported-to-Pakistan.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/forcibly-deported-to-Pakistan.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":356206,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/11\/rajasthan-high-court-amendment-citizenship-laws-for-children-born-abroad-to-indian-parents-visa-extension-australian-minor\/","url_meta":{"origin":134901,"position":1},"title":"Rajasthan High Court bats for amendments to citizenship laws for children born abroad to Indian parents; extends Australian minor\u2019s Visa","author":"Editor","date":"August 11, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u2018The petitioner being a 5-year-old minor cannot be compelled to be deported to Australia. The right against such deportation is protected under Article 21 of the Constitution.\u2019","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court bats for amendments to citizenship laws for children born abroad to Indian parents; extends Australian minor\u2019s Visa","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/citizenship-laws-for-children-born-abroad-to-Indian-parents.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/citizenship-laws-for-children-born-abroad-to-Indian-parents.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/citizenship-laws-for-children-born-abroad-to-Indian-parents.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/citizenship-laws-for-children-born-abroad-to-Indian-parents.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":314401,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/16\/cal-hc-affirms-rejection-of-extension-application-for-arrear-rent-deposit-under-section-7-of-wb-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":134901,"position":2},"title":"Calcutta High Court affirms rejection of extension application for arrear rent deposit under Section 7(1)(c) of W.B. Bengal Premises Tenancy Act","author":"Ritu","date":"February 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that the court\u2019s jurisdiction is limited in extending time for depositing rent, and it cannot go beyond the provisions of the law.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":358228,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/28\/rajasthan-high-court-rejects-asaram-bail-extension\/","url_meta":{"origin":134901,"position":3},"title":"Rajasthan High Court Rejects Extension of Asaram Bapu\u2019s Interim Bail","author":"Editor","date":"August 28, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Asaram Bapu was directed to surrender on or before at 11:00 a.m. on 30-08-2025.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Asaram bail","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Asaram-bail.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Asaram-bail.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Asaram-bail.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Asaram-bail.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":301753,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/18\/arbitral-award-termination-section-29-arbitration-conciliation-act-1996-void-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":134901,"position":4},"title":"Calcutta High Court deems Arbitral Award void after termination of Arbitrator\u2019s mandate under Section 29-A(4) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996","author":"Ritu","date":"September 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While cautioning the parties to the Arbitration proceedings, Calcutta High Court stated that parties should be vigilant in applying for extensions within the prescribed periods and dismissed the petitions seeking an extension of the arbitrator\u2019s mandate.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":336711,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/06\/madras-hc-default-bail-right-expiry-statutory-period\/","url_meta":{"origin":134901,"position":5},"title":"Does the right to default bail accrues upon the expiry of the statutory period if an investigation extension application is pending? Madras HC answers","author":"Apoorva","date":"December 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is needless to say that the decision in the bail application would be dependent on the decision in the extension application\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134901","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=134901"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134901\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/222107"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=134901"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=134901"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=134901"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}