{"id":134371,"date":"2017-05-30T11:33:04","date_gmt":"2017-05-30T06:03:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=134371"},"modified":"2017-05-30T11:33:04","modified_gmt":"2017-05-30T06:03:04","slug":"carlsberg-breweries-interlocutory-application-against-hunter-fails","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/30\/carlsberg-breweries-interlocutory-application-against-hunter-fails\/","title":{"rendered":"Carlsberg Breweries\u2019 interlocutory application against \u2018Hunter\u2019 fails"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:<\/strong> The Single Bench of Vipin Sanghi. J. has held that on a prima facie examination, neither the Carlsberg Breweries\u2019 claim for novelty in the design of its \u2018Tuborg\u2019 beer bottles was sustainable, and nor its claim of design infringement was made out, and therefore, rejected its application seeking an interlocutory injunction to restrain the defendant from using its bottle design.<\/p>\n

The plaintiff (Carlsberg Breweries) had contended that the defendant, the seller of \u2018Hunter\u2019 beer, had adopted an imitation of its bottle design, label mark and trade dress, and thereby had infringed its registered bottle design and trademark, and had engaged in passing off. The defendant had submitted since a composite suit for design infringement, trademark infringement and passing off was not maintainable in view of the Full Bench decision of Delhi High Court in Mohan Lal<\/em> v. Sona Paint<\/em> & Hardwares<\/em>, 2013 SCC Online Del 1980<\/a>, the instant suit should have been confined to the issue of design infringement. The plaintiff, however, contended that the decision in Mohan Lal<\/em> was per incuriam since Order II Rule 3 of CPC had been overlooked, and the Supreme Court decision in Dabur India Ltd<\/em>. v. K.R. Industries<\/em>, (2008) 10 SCC 595<\/a>, was not correctly appreciated by the Court.<\/p>\n

The High Court, being bound by the Full Bench decision in Mohan Lal<\/em>, restricted the instant case to the aspect of design infringement. However, the Court, keeping in view of the Supreme Court decision in Central Board of Dawoodi Bohra Community<\/em> v. State of Maharashtra<\/em>, (2005) 2 SCC 673<\/a>, requested the Chief Justice to consider whether the decision in Mohan Lal<\/em> needed reconsideration by a larger bench. Regarding the issue of design infringement, the Court noted that though the indentations\/grooving found in the plaintiff\u2019s bottle might be novel, the idea of adopting a bottle design with indentation\/grooving was not new in itself. Furthermore, the Court observed that on comparing the beer bottle of the plaintiff as a whole with the beer bottle of the defendant as a whole, and it could not be said that there was any obvious or fraudulent imitation on part of the defendant. [Carlsberg Breweries v. Som Distilleries and Breweries Ltd, 2017 SCC OnLine Del 8125<\/a>, delivered on May 02, 2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: The Single Bench of Vipin Sanghi. J. has held that on a prima facie examination, neither the Carlsberg Breweries\u2019 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[18081,18071],"class_list":["post-134371","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-design-infringement","tag-trademark-infringement"],"yoast_head":"\nCarlsberg Breweries\u2019 interlocutory application against \u2018Hunter\u2019 fails | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/30\/carlsberg-breweries-interlocutory-application-against-hunter-fails\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Carlsberg Breweries\u2019 interlocutory application against \u2018Hunter\u2019 fails\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: The Single Bench of Vipin Sanghi. J. has held that on a prima facie examination, neither the Carlsberg Breweries\u2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/30\/carlsberg-breweries-interlocutory-application-against-hunter-fails\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-05-30T06:03:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/05\\\/30\\\/carlsberg-breweries-interlocutory-application-against-hunter-fails\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/05\\\/30\\\/carlsberg-breweries-interlocutory-application-against-hunter-fails\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Saba\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"headline\":\"Carlsberg Breweries\u2019 interlocutory application against \u2018Hunter\u2019 fails\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-05-30T06:03:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/05\\\/30\\\/carlsberg-breweries-interlocutory-application-against-hunter-fails\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":371,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"design infringement\",\"trademark infringement\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/05\\\/30\\\/carlsberg-breweries-interlocutory-application-against-hunter-fails\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/05\\\/30\\\/carlsberg-breweries-interlocutory-application-against-hunter-fails\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/05\\\/30\\\/carlsberg-breweries-interlocutory-application-against-hunter-fails\\\/\",\"name\":\"Carlsberg Breweries\u2019 interlocutory application against \u2018Hunter\u2019 fails | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-05-30T06:03:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/05\\\/30\\\/carlsberg-breweries-interlocutory-application-against-hunter-fails\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/05\\\/30\\\/carlsberg-breweries-interlocutory-application-against-hunter-fails\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/05\\\/30\\\/carlsberg-breweries-interlocutory-application-against-hunter-fails\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Carlsberg Breweries\u2019 interlocutory application against \u2018Hunter\u2019 fails\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_2\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Carlsberg Breweries\u2019 interlocutory application against \u2018Hunter\u2019 fails | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/30\/carlsberg-breweries-interlocutory-application-against-hunter-fails\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Carlsberg Breweries\u2019 interlocutory application against \u2018Hunter\u2019 fails","og_description":"Delhi High Court: The Single Bench of Vipin Sanghi. J. has held that on a prima facie examination, neither the Carlsberg Breweries\u2019","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/30\/carlsberg-breweries-interlocutory-application-against-hunter-fails\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-05-30T06:03:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/30\/carlsberg-breweries-interlocutory-application-against-hunter-fails\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/30\/carlsberg-breweries-interlocutory-application-against-hunter-fails\/"},"author":{"name":"Saba","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"headline":"Carlsberg Breweries\u2019 interlocutory application against \u2018Hunter\u2019 fails","datePublished":"2017-05-30T06:03:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/30\/carlsberg-breweries-interlocutory-application-against-hunter-fails\/"},"wordCount":371,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["design infringement","trademark infringement"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/30\/carlsberg-breweries-interlocutory-application-against-hunter-fails\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/30\/carlsberg-breweries-interlocutory-application-against-hunter-fails\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/30\/carlsberg-breweries-interlocutory-application-against-hunter-fails\/","name":"Carlsberg Breweries\u2019 interlocutory application against \u2018Hunter\u2019 fails | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-05-30T06:03:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/30\/carlsberg-breweries-interlocutory-application-against-hunter-fails\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/30\/carlsberg-breweries-interlocutory-application-against-hunter-fails\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/30\/carlsberg-breweries-interlocutory-application-against-hunter-fails\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Carlsberg Breweries\u2019 interlocutory application against \u2018Hunter\u2019 fails"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":274022,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/20\/delhi-high-court-grants-ad-interim-injunction-against-tensberg-having-phonetic-similarity-with-carlsberg\/","url_meta":{"origin":134371,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ad-interim injunction against Tensberg having phonetic similarity with Carlsberg","author":"Editor","date":"September 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The advertisements on the Facebook page and YouTube channel alone, in my prima facie opinion, cannot be sufficient to deny the plaintiff its statutory rights as a registered proprietor of the mark.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Delhi-High-Court-grants-ad-interim-injunction-against-Tensberg-having-phonetic-similarity-with-Carlsberg-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Delhi-High-Court-grants-ad-interim-injunction-against-Tensberg-having-phonetic-similarity-with-Carlsberg-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Delhi-High-Court-grants-ad-interim-injunction-against-Tensberg-having-phonetic-similarity-with-Carlsberg-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Delhi-High-Court-grants-ad-interim-injunction-against-Tensberg-having-phonetic-similarity-with-Carlsberg-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Delhi-High-Court-grants-ad-interim-injunction-against-Tensberg-having-phonetic-similarity-with-Carlsberg-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":254750,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/27\/cci-breweries-brewing-bilious-buzz-busted-united-breweries-carlsberg-sabmiller-involved-in-cartelisation-suffers-a-750-crore-penalty\/","url_meta":{"origin":134371,"position":1},"title":"CCI | Breweries brewing bilious buzz busted-United Breweries, Carlsberg, SABMiller involved in Cartelisation suffers a 750 Crore penalty","author":"Editor","date":"September 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI): In its recent press release, Competition Commission of India, while giving benefit of reduction in penalty under the provisions of Section 46 of the Competition Act, 2002\u00a0 of 100%, 40% and 20%\u00a0\u00a0 to AB InBev, United Breweries Ltd. (UBL) and\u00a0 Carlsberg India Private Limited (CIPL),\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":287471,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/22\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-trade-mark-infringement-old-monk-ad-interim-injunction-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":134371,"position":2},"title":"[\u2018Old Monk\u2019 Trademark Dispute] Himachal Pradesh High Court grants ad-interim injunction in favour of Mohan Meakin Ltd","author":"Ritu","date":"March 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The use of the word MONK in most prominent manner shows dishonest intention on the part of the Defendant.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Himachal Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-834.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-834.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-834.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-834.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282693,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/30\/trademark-v-domain-name-bombay-hc-holds-trademark-infringement-suit-is-an-action-in-personam-court-cannot-impose-a-blanket-ban-on-swiggy-mark-in-future\/","url_meta":{"origin":134371,"position":3},"title":"[Trademark v. Domain Name] Bombay HC holds trademark infringement suit is an action in personam; Court cannot impose a blanket ban on \u201cSwiggy\u201d mark in future","author":"Editor","date":"January 30, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Court held that in every case of trademark infringement, the plaintiff claiming infringement of its registered mark is required to claim relief in the context of specific instances of infringement, relatable to individuals against whom orders can be passed by the Court.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Bombay-High-Court-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":201887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/18\/summary-judgment-under-order-xiii-of-commercial-courts-act-2015-passed-for-infringement-of-trademark-sandisk\/","url_meta":{"origin":134371,"position":4},"title":"Summary judgment under Order XIII of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 passed for infringement of trademark SanDisk","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Manmohan, J. allowed a suit for permanent injunction, restraining the use of plaintiff\u2019s registered trademark SanDisk. The plaintiff is one of the largest dedicated provider of flash memory storage solutions under the house mark SanDisk. It is a Fortune 500 and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":202017,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/20\/permanent-injunction-granted-for-infringement-of-trademark-on-satisfaction-of-triple-identity-test\/","url_meta":{"origin":134371,"position":5},"title":"Permanent injunction granted for infringement of trademark on satisfaction of \u2018triple identity test\u2019","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Manmohan, J. decreed a suit for grant of a permanent injunction against the defendant for infringement of plaintiff \u2019s trademarks. It was an admitted fact that the plaintiff was a registered owner of the trademarks SUMEET and SUMEET TRADITIONAL for their\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134371","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=134371"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134371\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=134371"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=134371"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=134371"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}