{"id":132621,"date":"2017-05-22T15:21:38","date_gmt":"2017-05-22T09:51:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=132621"},"modified":"2017-05-25T15:09:12","modified_gmt":"2017-05-25T09:39:12","slug":"parties-to-a-suit-can-be-directed-to-produce-documents-in-their-possession-which-are-relevant-to-decide-the-controversy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/parties-to-a-suit-can-be-directed-to-produce-documents-in-their-possession-which-are-relevant-to-decide-the-controversy\/","title":{"rendered":"Parties to a suit can be directed to produce documents in their possession, which are relevant to decide the controversy"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:<\/strong> A Bench comprising of Vipin Sanghi, J. has dismissed the chamber appeal filed by the defendants against the order passed by the Joint Registrar (Judicial), in which the defendants were directed to produce on oath certain documents.<\/p>\n

The original suit was regarding the telecast of a news programme and publication of an article by the defendants, which the plaintiff challenged as defamatory. Plaintif moved an application under Order XI Rule 14 CPC to seek production of the original news programme telecasted and the article published by the defendants on the premise that the originals of the said documents are in the power and custody of the defendants. This application was allowed by the Registrar, and the defendants filed an appeal against the same.<\/p>\n

The defendants contended that the onus to prove the defamation lies upon the plaintiff. He should produce his copy of the telecast and publication. The defendants cannot be called upon to produce evidence which may be used by the plaintiff against them. The Court observed that a plain meaning of Order XI Rule 14 is that a party to a suit, who is in possession or power of a document, may be directed during the pendency of the suit to produce the same. The documents which the plaintiff seeks production, are in the power and possession of the defendants, since they are the authors of the said works, and have telecasted\/published the same. The Court observed that there is no dispute between the parties regarding the telecast\/publication of the news programme\/article as the defendants didn’t deny the same. Therefore, there is no need for the plaintiff to lead evidence regarding the telecast and publication. Plaintiff is only obliged to lead evidence regarding what was telecasted and published, by leading the original document. Since this evidence is in the power and possession of the defendants, they can be required to produce the same. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed by the Court. [Naveen Jindal v. Zee Media Corporation Ltd, 2017 SCC OnLine Del 8209<\/a>, decided on 08-05-2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: A Bench comprising of Vipin Sanghi, J. has dismissed the chamber appeal filed by the defendants against the order <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[17761,17771],"class_list":["post-132621","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-order-xi-rule-14-cpc","tag-production-of-documents"],"yoast_head":"\nParties to a suit can be directed to produce documents in their possession, which are relevant to decide the controversy | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/parties-to-a-suit-can-be-directed-to-produce-documents-in-their-possession-which-are-relevant-to-decide-the-controversy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Parties to a suit can be directed to produce documents in their possession, which are relevant to decide the controversy\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: A Bench comprising of Vipin Sanghi, J. has dismissed the chamber appeal filed by the defendants against the order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/parties-to-a-suit-can-be-directed-to-produce-documents-in-their-possession-which-are-relevant-to-decide-the-controversy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-05-22T09:51:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-25T09:39:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/parties-to-a-suit-can-be-directed-to-produce-documents-in-their-possession-which-are-relevant-to-decide-the-controversy\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/parties-to-a-suit-can-be-directed-to-produce-documents-in-their-possession-which-are-relevant-to-decide-the-controversy\/\",\"name\":\"Parties to a suit can be directed to produce documents in their possession, which are relevant to decide the controversy | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-05-22T09:51:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-25T09:39:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/parties-to-a-suit-can-be-directed-to-produce-documents-in-their-possession-which-are-relevant-to-decide-the-controversy\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/parties-to-a-suit-can-be-directed-to-produce-documents-in-their-possession-which-are-relevant-to-decide-the-controversy\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/parties-to-a-suit-can-be-directed-to-produce-documents-in-their-possession-which-are-relevant-to-decide-the-controversy\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Parties to a suit can be directed to produce documents in their possession, which are relevant to decide the controversy\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Parties to a suit can be directed to produce documents in their possession, which are relevant to decide the controversy | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/parties-to-a-suit-can-be-directed-to-produce-documents-in-their-possession-which-are-relevant-to-decide-the-controversy\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Parties to a suit can be directed to produce documents in their possession, which are relevant to decide the controversy","og_description":"Delhi High Court: A Bench comprising of Vipin Sanghi, J. has dismissed the chamber appeal filed by the defendants against the order","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/parties-to-a-suit-can-be-directed-to-produce-documents-in-their-possession-which-are-relevant-to-decide-the-controversy\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-05-22T09:51:38+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-25T09:39:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/parties-to-a-suit-can-be-directed-to-produce-documents-in-their-possession-which-are-relevant-to-decide-the-controversy\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/parties-to-a-suit-can-be-directed-to-produce-documents-in-their-possession-which-are-relevant-to-decide-the-controversy\/","name":"Parties to a suit can be directed to produce documents in their possession, which are relevant to decide the controversy | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-05-22T09:51:38+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-25T09:39:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/parties-to-a-suit-can-be-directed-to-produce-documents-in-their-possession-which-are-relevant-to-decide-the-controversy\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/parties-to-a-suit-can-be-directed-to-produce-documents-in-their-possession-which-are-relevant-to-decide-the-controversy\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/parties-to-a-suit-can-be-directed-to-produce-documents-in-their-possession-which-are-relevant-to-decide-the-controversy\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Parties to a suit can be directed to produce documents in their possession, which are relevant to decide the controversy"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":317683,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/18\/calcutta-high-court-directs-rehearing-of-application-under-order-xii-rule-6-cpc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":132621,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Admissions in pleading are primarily germane\u2019; Calcutta High Court directs rehearing of application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC","author":"Ritu","date":"March 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that the trial court erred in considering extraneous documents regarding Thika Tenancy, as the defendants had not pleaded such defenses in their written statement.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":206325,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/06\/right-to-begin-under-order-18-rule-1-cpc-can-be-given-to-defendant-under-certain-circumstances\/","url_meta":{"origin":132621,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Right to begin\u2019 under Order 18 Rule 1 CPC can be given to defendant under certain circumstances","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 6, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of A.K. Rath, J., dismissed the petition under Article 227 of the Constitution which challenged the order by the Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Puri whereby the trial court allowed the application of the plaintiff under Order 18 Rule 1 CPC and directed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":326238,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/delhi-hc-set-asides-impugned-order-allowing-documents-taken-records-after-14-months-of-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":132621,"position":2},"title":"Delhi HC sets aside impugned order allowing documents taken on record after 14 months of initiation of suit","author":"Editor","date":"July 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court stated that the impugned order was entirely against the compliance of provision under Order XI Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and spirit of Commercial Courts Act, 2015, thus, the documents brought on record were directed to be taken off the record.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217074,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/19\/ori-hc-admission-of-only-some-facts-would-not-qualify-defendants-the-right-to-begin-first-under-or-18-r-1-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":132621,"position":3},"title":"Ori HC | Admission of only some facts would not qualify defendants the right to begin first under Or. 18 R. 1 CPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 19, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: Dr A.K. Rath, J. allowed the present petition and quashed an order passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) directing the plaintiffs to begin first due to the defendants only admitting some of the facts alleged. In the present case, the possession of the suit property\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":373438,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/22\/once-plaint-returned-for-lack-of-pecuniary-jurisdiction-suit-proceeds-de-novo-jk-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":132621,"position":4},"title":"Once plaint is returned for lack of pecuniary jurisdiction, suit proceeds de novo; Earlier pleadings and evidence are non est: J&K and Ladakh HC","author":"Sunaina","date":"January 22, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cOnce it is concluded that the initial proceedings were held before a court that lacked jurisdiction, the written statement and other evidence that may have been led by the parties before the said court become non-est in the eyes of law.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"suit proceeds de novo","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/suit-proceeds-de-novo.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/suit-proceeds-de-novo.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/suit-proceeds-de-novo.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/suit-proceeds-de-novo.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":344538,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/city-civil-judge-citing-non-existing-cases-disturbing-probe-ordred-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":132621,"position":5},"title":"Karnataka HC terms the act of City Civil Judge citing non-existing cases to back decision as \u2018disturbing\u2019; Directs probe in the matter","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 28, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"While rejecting the defendants\u2019 application under Order VII Rule 10 of the CPC, the Civil Judge cited 2 non-existent Supreme Court rulings to back his decision.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132621","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=132621"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132621\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=132621"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=132621"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=132621"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}