{"id":132541,"date":"2017-05-22T13:00:30","date_gmt":"2017-05-22T07:30:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=132541"},"modified":"2017-05-25T15:07:00","modified_gmt":"2017-05-25T09:37:00","slug":"differential-treatment-by-government-extending-benefits-to-weaker-sections-is-not-violative-of-articles-14-19","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/differential-treatment-by-government-extending-benefits-to-weaker-sections-is-not-violative-of-articles-14-19\/","title":{"rendered":"Differential treatment by Govt., extending benefits to weaker sections is not violative of Articles 14 & 19\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court:<\/strong> A Bench comprising of Rajendra Menon, C.J. and Sudhir Singh, J. has dismissed the writ application in which two Government Resolutions were challenged as violative of Articles 14, 19 (1)(g) and 38 of the Constitution.<\/p>\n

One of the resolutions, which stipulates that publication of tender notice was not necessary, was challenged as giving rise to arbitrariness and monopoly. The other resolution, which provides for 50% reservation in Public Works Contracts was challenged as violative of Articles 14 and 19 (1)(g). The respondent took recourse to Articles 38 and 46 of the Constitution, which direct the State to eliminate inequality and promote economic interests of the weaker sections of the people.<\/p>\n

The Court referred to Article 14 and observed that though it talks about ‘equality before law’, but all persons are not equal by nature, attainment or circumstances, and therefore a mechanical equality may result in injustice. The different needs of different classes of people require differential and separate treatment. It is, therefore, necessary for the State to have the power of making laws to achieve particulars object and, for that purpose, to distinguish, select and classify persons and things. After discussing a catena of judicial decisions on the said matter, it was held that to treat people who are not situated euqally, as equals would itself be violative of Article 14, as this would itself result in inequality. Therefore, if the law in question is based on rational classification, it is not regarded as discriminatory. It was further stated that non-exclusion of creamy layer will be a breach of Article 14. However, in the present case, the Court observed that, in terms of one of the impugned resolutions, ‘creamy layer’ or ‘socially advanced persons’ have been excluded as not being entitled to benefit. Consequently, it was held that the impugned resolutions do not suffer from vice of arbitrariness and unreasonableness, and they are not violative of Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution. [Sapna Singh v. State of Bihar, 2017 SCC OnLine Pat 679<\/a>, decided on 11.05.2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court: A Bench comprising of Rajendra Menon, C.J. and Sudhir Singh, J. has dismissed the writ application in which two <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[17741,3165,17751],"class_list":["post-132541","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-public-works-contracts","tag-publication","tag-tender-notice"],"yoast_head":"\nDifferential treatment by Govt., extending benefits to weaker sections is not violative of Articles 14 & 19\u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/differential-treatment-by-government-extending-benefits-to-weaker-sections-is-not-violative-of-articles-14-19\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Differential treatment by Govt., extending benefits to weaker sections is not violative of Articles 14 & 19\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patna High Court: A Bench comprising of Rajendra Menon, C.J. and Sudhir Singh, J. has dismissed the writ application in which two\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/differential-treatment-by-government-extending-benefits-to-weaker-sections-is-not-violative-of-articles-14-19\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-05-22T07:30:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-25T09:37:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/differential-treatment-by-government-extending-benefits-to-weaker-sections-is-not-violative-of-articles-14-19\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/differential-treatment-by-government-extending-benefits-to-weaker-sections-is-not-violative-of-articles-14-19\/\",\"name\":\"Differential treatment by Govt., extending benefits to weaker sections is not violative of Articles 14 & 19\u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-05-22T07:30:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-25T09:37:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/differential-treatment-by-government-extending-benefits-to-weaker-sections-is-not-violative-of-articles-14-19\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/differential-treatment-by-government-extending-benefits-to-weaker-sections-is-not-violative-of-articles-14-19\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/differential-treatment-by-government-extending-benefits-to-weaker-sections-is-not-violative-of-articles-14-19\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Differential treatment by Govt., extending benefits to weaker sections is not violative of Articles 14 & 19\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Differential treatment by Govt., extending benefits to weaker sections is not violative of Articles 14 & 19\u00a0 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/differential-treatment-by-government-extending-benefits-to-weaker-sections-is-not-violative-of-articles-14-19\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Differential treatment by Govt., extending benefits to weaker sections is not violative of Articles 14 & 19\u00a0","og_description":"Patna High Court: A Bench comprising of Rajendra Menon, C.J. and Sudhir Singh, J. has dismissed the writ application in which two","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/differential-treatment-by-government-extending-benefits-to-weaker-sections-is-not-violative-of-articles-14-19\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-05-22T07:30:30+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-25T09:37:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/differential-treatment-by-government-extending-benefits-to-weaker-sections-is-not-violative-of-articles-14-19\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/differential-treatment-by-government-extending-benefits-to-weaker-sections-is-not-violative-of-articles-14-19\/","name":"Differential treatment by Govt., extending benefits to weaker sections is not violative of Articles 14 & 19\u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-05-22T07:30:30+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-25T09:37:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/differential-treatment-by-government-extending-benefits-to-weaker-sections-is-not-violative-of-articles-14-19\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/differential-treatment-by-government-extending-benefits-to-weaker-sections-is-not-violative-of-articles-14-19\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/differential-treatment-by-government-extending-benefits-to-weaker-sections-is-not-violative-of-articles-14-19\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Differential treatment by Govt., extending benefits to weaker sections is not violative of Articles 14 & 19\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":223873,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/06\/kar-hc-challenge-to-the-constitutional-validity-of-the-amendment-in-karnataka-transparency-in-public-procurements-act-making-concessions-in-favour-of-sc-st-rejected\/","url_meta":{"origin":132541,"position":0},"title":"Kar HC | Challenge to constitutional validity of amendment in Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements Act making concessions in favour of SC\/ST rejected","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: B. Veerappa, J. dismissed the writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India,\u00a0 by a Public Works Department Contractor. In this petition Section 6 of the Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements (KTTP) Act, 1999, was upheld by this Court. It enabled to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":302849,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/03\/telangana-hc-upholds-validity-of-provisions-of-press-and-registration-of-books-act-1967-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":132541,"position":1},"title":"Telangana High Court upholds validity of Sections 5, 6 and 15 of Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867","author":"Editor","date":"October 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe legislature itself has defined the books and newspapers separately. The wrath of Article 14 of the Constitution is attracted only when equals are sought to be treated differently.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"telangana high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":310389,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/30\/chhattisgarh-hc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-section-164-of-cgst-act-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":132541,"position":2},"title":"Chhattisgarh High Court upholds constitutional validity of Section 16(4) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017","author":"Editor","date":"December 30, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe petitioner herein, which has filed the present writ petition, is only a proprietorship firm and not a citizen and therefore cannot claim protection of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"chhattisgarh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":308794,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/08\/vires-section-15-5-cgst-act-and-other-provisions-challenged-bomby-hc-issues-notice\/","url_meta":{"origin":132541,"position":3},"title":"Constitutionality of Section 15(5) of the CGST Act and other provisions challenged; Bombay High Court issues notice","author":"Ridhi","date":"December 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Bomby High Court issued notice to the Attorney General regarding challenge to the provisions of Section 15(5) of the CGST Act, 2017 being unconstitutional and violative of Articles 246A and 366(12) of the Constitution of India.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"bombay high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6249,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/07\/28\/university-grant-commission-institutions-deemed-to-be-universities-regulations-2010-held-unconstitutional\/","url_meta":{"origin":132541,"position":4},"title":"University Grant Commission (Institutions Deemed to be Universities) Regulations 2010 held unconstitutional","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 28, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: While deciding a case, where petitioners challenged the constitutional validity of University Grant Commission (Institutions Deemed to be Universities) Regulations 2010 (Regulations) on the ground that they are violative of Articles 19(1); (g) and 26 of the Constitution of India,\u00a0 the Court declared these regulations to be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "High Courts"","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":277017,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/08\/dissent-10-percent-quota-ews-econimically-weaker-sections-constitutional-supreme-court-constitution-bench-32-verdict-legal-research-updates-law-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":132541,"position":5},"title":"‘Identifier for 10% Quota for EWS is economic deprivation; Social or educational backwardness irrelevant’: Key takeaways from Dissenting opinion\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"While Dinesh Maheshwari, Bela M Trivedi and JB Pardiwala, JJ wrote separate but concurrent opinions forming majority, S. Ravindra Bhat, J wrote the minority opinion for himself and U.U. Lalit, CJ.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Identifier-for-10-Quota-for-EWS-is-economic-deprivation-Social-or-educational-backwardness-irrelevant-Key-takeaways-from-Dissenting-opinion-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Identifier-for-10-Quota-for-EWS-is-economic-deprivation-Social-or-educational-backwardness-irrelevant-Key-takeaways-from-Dissenting-opinion-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Identifier-for-10-Quota-for-EWS-is-economic-deprivation-Social-or-educational-backwardness-irrelevant-Key-takeaways-from-Dissenting-opinion-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Identifier-for-10-Quota-for-EWS-is-economic-deprivation-Social-or-educational-backwardness-irrelevant-Key-takeaways-from-Dissenting-opinion-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Identifier-for-10-Quota-for-EWS-is-economic-deprivation-Social-or-educational-backwardness-irrelevant-Key-takeaways-from-Dissenting-opinion-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132541","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=132541"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132541\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=132541"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=132541"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=132541"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}