{"id":132461,"date":"2017-05-20T20:46:17","date_gmt":"2017-05-20T15:16:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=132461"},"modified":"2017-05-24T12:05:27","modified_gmt":"2017-05-24T06:35:27","slug":"existing-factory-should-be-in-operation-for-application-of-clause-6a-of-the-sugarcane-control-order-2006","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/20\/existing-factory-should-be-in-operation-for-application-of-clause-6a-of-the-sugarcane-control-order-2006\/","title":{"rendered":"Existing factory should be in ‘operation’ for application of Clause 6A of the Sugarcane Control Order, 2006"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: <\/strong>The Bench comprising of A.K Sikri and Abhay Manohar Sapre, JJ., said that where economic interest competes with the rights of other persons, need is to strike a balance between the two competing interests and have a balanced approach. The Bench was hearing the dispute as existence of 2 sugarcane factories within the radius of 15 km, thereby, violating Clause 6A of the Sugarcane (Control) Amendment Order, 2006.<\/p>\n

Appellant stated that at the time of setting up of factory he received all the required permissions and his IEM also stood acknowledged, respondent also granted the no objection certificate to the new setup of the factory, even the Survey of India and Director of Sugar stated that, no similar factory lies within its radius of 15 km. The Appellant argued that at the time of establishment of the factory no \u201cexisting\u201d sugar factory was there as per the definition given in clause 6A stating that an existing sugar factory is a factory which is in \u201coperation\u201d and respondent\u2019s factory was not carrying out its crushing operations for last five sugar seasons therefore was not an existing factory and large amount of sugarcane was wasted amounting to huge losses to sugarcane farmers and appellant further prayed that a huge amount of investment has already been made by him therefore this economic factor should also be considered.<\/p>\n

Accepting the argument, the Court held that at the time of establishment of the sugar factory by the appellant, he had bona fide intention and followed the requirements under clause 6A of Sugarcane (Control) Amendment Order 2006, the Court said that the requirement of distance mentioned in the Amendment Order was inserted keeping in mind the benefit of the existing sugar factories. In a situation like this, when such a factory itself gave no objection certificate, thereby waived the requirement, the bona fides of the appellant cannot be doubted.<\/p>\n

The Court also considered the economic factors such as the expenditure of approximately Rs.300 crores by the appellant in establishing the factory; loans raised to the tune of Rs. 237 crores; operational cost of Rs. 150 crores; generation of employment of 377 persons on regular basis and indirect employment of more than 7000 persons; and setting up of co-generation plant for production of electricity which is giving supply of 37 MW of electricity. The Court, hence, held that these factors, particularly, bank loans, employment, generation and production at the factory serve useful public purpose and such economic considerations cannot be overlooked, in the context where there is hardly any statutory violation. [Shivashakti Sugars Ltd. v Renuka Sugar Ltd., 2017 SCC OnLine SC 6024<\/a>, decided on 9-5-\u00a02017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: The Bench comprising of A.K Sikri and Abhay Manohar Sapre, JJ., said that where economic interest competes with the rights <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[17691,17681,2526,17701],"class_list":["post-132461","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-balancing-of-equities","tag-existing-factory","tag-Interpretation","tag-sugarcane-control-order"],"yoast_head":"\nExisting factory should be in 'operation' for application of Clause 6A of the Sugarcane Control Order, 2006 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/20\/existing-factory-should-be-in-operation-for-application-of-clause-6a-of-the-sugarcane-control-order-2006\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Existing factory should be in 'operation' for application of Clause 6A of the Sugarcane Control Order, 2006\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: The Bench comprising of A.K Sikri and Abhay Manohar Sapre, JJ., said that where economic interest competes with the rights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/20\/existing-factory-should-be-in-operation-for-application-of-clause-6a-of-the-sugarcane-control-order-2006\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-05-20T15:16:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-24T06:35:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/20\/existing-factory-should-be-in-operation-for-application-of-clause-6a-of-the-sugarcane-control-order-2006\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/20\/existing-factory-should-be-in-operation-for-application-of-clause-6a-of-the-sugarcane-control-order-2006\/\",\"name\":\"Existing factory should be in 'operation' for application of Clause 6A of the Sugarcane Control Order, 2006 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/20\/existing-factory-should-be-in-operation-for-application-of-clause-6a-of-the-sugarcane-control-order-2006\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/20\/existing-factory-should-be-in-operation-for-application-of-clause-6a-of-the-sugarcane-control-order-2006\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-05-20T15:16:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-24T06:35:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/20\/existing-factory-should-be-in-operation-for-application-of-clause-6a-of-the-sugarcane-control-order-2006\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/20\/existing-factory-should-be-in-operation-for-application-of-clause-6a-of-the-sugarcane-control-order-2006\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/20\/existing-factory-should-be-in-operation-for-application-of-clause-6a-of-the-sugarcane-control-order-2006\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/20\/existing-factory-should-be-in-operation-for-application-of-clause-6a-of-the-sugarcane-control-order-2006\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Existing factory should be in ‘operation’ for application of Clause 6A of the Sugarcane Control Order, 2006\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Existing factory should be in 'operation' for application of Clause 6A of the Sugarcane Control Order, 2006 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/20\/existing-factory-should-be-in-operation-for-application-of-clause-6a-of-the-sugarcane-control-order-2006\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Existing factory should be in 'operation' for application of Clause 6A of the Sugarcane Control Order, 2006","og_description":"Supreme Court: The Bench comprising of A.K Sikri and Abhay Manohar Sapre, JJ., said that where economic interest competes with the rights","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/20\/existing-factory-should-be-in-operation-for-application-of-clause-6a-of-the-sugarcane-control-order-2006\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-05-20T15:16:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-24T06:35:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/20\/existing-factory-should-be-in-operation-for-application-of-clause-6a-of-the-sugarcane-control-order-2006\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/20\/existing-factory-should-be-in-operation-for-application-of-clause-6a-of-the-sugarcane-control-order-2006\/","name":"Existing factory should be in 'operation' for application of Clause 6A of the Sugarcane Control Order, 2006 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/20\/existing-factory-should-be-in-operation-for-application-of-clause-6a-of-the-sugarcane-control-order-2006\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/20\/existing-factory-should-be-in-operation-for-application-of-clause-6a-of-the-sugarcane-control-order-2006\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2017-05-20T15:16:17+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-24T06:35:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/20\/existing-factory-should-be-in-operation-for-application-of-clause-6a-of-the-sugarcane-control-order-2006\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/20\/existing-factory-should-be-in-operation-for-application-of-clause-6a-of-the-sugarcane-control-order-2006\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/20\/existing-factory-should-be-in-operation-for-application-of-clause-6a-of-the-sugarcane-control-order-2006\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/20\/existing-factory-should-be-in-operation-for-application-of-clause-6a-of-the-sugarcane-control-order-2006\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Existing factory should be in ‘operation’ for application of Clause 6A of the Sugarcane Control Order, 2006"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":211510,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/07\/211510\/","url_meta":{"origin":132461,"position":0},"title":"SC elaborates on the scheme of determining additional purchase price under Clause 5A under Sugarcane Control Order, 1966","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 7, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: On the question relating to assessment of the taxable income of a Co-operative Society engaged in the business of production of sugarcane and sale thereof, the 3-judge bench Dr. AK Sikri, SA Nazeer and MR Shah, JJ said that the entire amount of difference between the Statutory Minimum\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":228705,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/04\/24\/state-government-cannot-fix-the-minimum-price-of-sugarcane-once-centre-has-already-fixed-it\/","url_meta":{"origin":132461,"position":1},"title":"State Government cannot fix the \u201cminimum price\u201d of sugarcane once Centre has already fixed it","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 24, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 5-judge bench of Arun Mishra, Indira Banerjee and Vineet Saran, M.R. Shah and Aniruddha Bose, JJ., held that once the Central Government having exercised the power under Entries 33 and 34 List III of seventh Schedule and fixed the \u201cminimum price\u201d, the State Government cannot fix the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270610,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/25\/unless-there-is-forfeiture-of-performance-guarantee-industrial-entrepreneur-memorandum-cannot-be-deemed-to-be-de-recognised-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":132461,"position":2},"title":"Unless there is forfeiture of performance guarantee, Industrial Entrepreneur Memorandum cannot be deemed to be de-recognised: SC","author":"Editor","date":"July 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Supreme Court: While reversing the impugned decision of the Bombay High Court, the Division Bench of Hemant Gupta* and V. Ramasubramanian, JJ., held that unless there is forfeiture of performance guarantee and opportunity of being heard is granted to an entrepreneur, the Industrial Entrepreneur Memorandum cannot be deemed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-3-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-3-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-3-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-3-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":327459,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/28\/seller-prove-readiness-willingness-to-perform-part-of-contract-to-sustain-claim-for-damages-for-breach-of-contract\/","url_meta":{"origin":132461,"position":3},"title":"Never Reported Judgment| Seller must prove readiness and willingness to perform his part of contract to sustain his claim for damages for breach of contract [(1953) 2 SCC 52]","author":"Arushi","date":"July 28, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"This report covers the Supreme Court's Never Reported Judgment dating back to the year 1953 on damages for breach of contract.","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"damages for breach of contract","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/damages-for-breach-of-contract.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/damages-for-breach-of-contract.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/damages-for-breach-of-contract.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/damages-for-breach-of-contract.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":263654,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/14\/explained-compensation-under-section-4-of-employees-compensation-act-1923-to-be-awarded-from-the-date-of-accident-or-the-date-of-commissioners-order\/","url_meta":{"origin":132461,"position":4},"title":"Explained| Compensation under Section 4 of Employee\u2019s Compensation Act, 1923 to be awarded from the date of accident or the date of Commissioner’s order?\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that as per Section 4A of the Employee\u2019s Compensation Act, 1923, the liability to pay the compensation would arise from the date on which the deceased died for which he is entitled to the compensation and therefore,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-108.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-108.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-108.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-108.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-108.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200294,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/18\/assessee-liable-under-section-3-b-of-the-u-p-trade-tax-act-1948-no-error-in-findings-of-tribunal-found\/","url_meta":{"origin":132461,"position":5},"title":"Assessee liable under Section 3-B of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948; no error in findings of Tribunal found","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J., dealt with a question where petitioner\/Assessee was engaged in the manufacturing and sale of sugar and its bagasse. Petitioner was held liable under Section 3-B of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 on the ground that he\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132461","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=132461"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132461\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=132461"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=132461"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=132461"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}