{"id":131001,"date":"2017-05-15T18:30:57","date_gmt":"2017-05-15T13:00:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=131001"},"modified":"2017-06-02T15:57:41","modified_gmt":"2017-06-02T10:27:41","slug":"arbitrary-exercise-of-power-of-talaq-a-violation-of-fundamental-rights","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/15\/arbitrary-exercise-of-power-of-talaq-a-violation-of-fundamental-rights\/","title":{"rendered":"Arbitrary exercise of power of Talaq, a violation of fundamental rights"},"content":{"rendered":"

Allahabad High Court:<\/strong> While considering an application filed under Section 482 CrPC the\u00a0Single Bench of Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J. has observed that Talaq by a Muslim husband to\u00a0his wife cannot be made in a manner which may infringe her fundamental rights guaranteed\u00a0under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.<\/p>\n

In the instant case, the opposite party had moved a complaint before Addl. Chief Judicial\u00a0Magistrate against her husband, mother-in-law and father-in-law for beating her, ousting her\u00a0from their house, and demanding dowry from her parents. Consequently, Addl. Chief Judicial\u00a0Magistrate, passed an order under Section 204 of CrPC summoning the applicants under Section\u00a0498-A, 323, 504, 506 of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant contended that since he had divorced his wife by way of Triple Talaq and the same has been\u00a0approved by a Fatwa, the complaint case proceedings were null and void.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution entitle Muslim Women to live\u00a0with dignity and to oppose the arbitrary exercise of the power of Talaq by her husband, such as\u00a0the mere pronouncement of the word \u2018Talaq\u2019 thrice at a time, as allegedly done by the applicant-husband. The Court further added that since a ‘Fatwa’ does not emanate from any judicial system\u00a0recognized by law, it is not binding on anyone. Therefore, the complaint case proceedings could\u00a0not be challenged on the basis of the alleged divorce or the fatwa. Moreover, the statements of\u00a0the opposite party and the witnesses recorded under Section 200 and 202 of CrPC made out a\u00a0prima facie case against the applicants. Hence, the exercise of the power under Section 482 of\u00a0CrPC was not warranted. [Aaqil Jamil v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2017 SCC OnLine All 1325<\/a>, decided on \u00a019.04.2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Allahabad High Court: While considering an application filed under Section 482 CrPC the\u00a0Single Bench of Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J. has observed that <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[17461,3268,6501],"class_list":["post-131001","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-arbitrary-exercise","tag-Fundamental_Rights","tag-triple-talaq"],"yoast_head":"\nArbitrary exercise of power of Talaq, a violation of fundamental rights | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/15\/arbitrary-exercise-of-power-of-talaq-a-violation-of-fundamental-rights\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Arbitrary exercise of power of Talaq, a violation of fundamental rights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court: While considering an application filed under Section 482 CrPC the\u00a0Single Bench of Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J. has observed that\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/15\/arbitrary-exercise-of-power-of-talaq-a-violation-of-fundamental-rights\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-05-15T13:00:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-06-02T10:27:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/15\/arbitrary-exercise-of-power-of-talaq-a-violation-of-fundamental-rights\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/15\/arbitrary-exercise-of-power-of-talaq-a-violation-of-fundamental-rights\/\",\"name\":\"Arbitrary exercise of power of Talaq, a violation of fundamental rights | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-05-15T13:00:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-02T10:27:41+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/15\/arbitrary-exercise-of-power-of-talaq-a-violation-of-fundamental-rights\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/15\/arbitrary-exercise-of-power-of-talaq-a-violation-of-fundamental-rights\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/15\/arbitrary-exercise-of-power-of-talaq-a-violation-of-fundamental-rights\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Arbitrary exercise of power of Talaq, a violation of fundamental rights\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Arbitrary exercise of power of Talaq, a violation of fundamental rights | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/15\/arbitrary-exercise-of-power-of-talaq-a-violation-of-fundamental-rights\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Arbitrary exercise of power of Talaq, a violation of fundamental rights","og_description":"Allahabad High Court: While considering an application filed under Section 482 CrPC the\u00a0Single Bench of Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J. has observed that","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/15\/arbitrary-exercise-of-power-of-talaq-a-violation-of-fundamental-rights\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-05-15T13:00:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-06-02T10:27:41+00:00","author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/15\/arbitrary-exercise-of-power-of-talaq-a-violation-of-fundamental-rights\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/15\/arbitrary-exercise-of-power-of-talaq-a-violation-of-fundamental-rights\/","name":"Arbitrary exercise of power of Talaq, a violation of fundamental rights | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-05-15T13:00:57+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-02T10:27:41+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/15\/arbitrary-exercise-of-power-of-talaq-a-violation-of-fundamental-rights\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/15\/arbitrary-exercise-of-power-of-talaq-a-violation-of-fundamental-rights\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/15\/arbitrary-exercise-of-power-of-talaq-a-violation-of-fundamental-rights\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Arbitrary exercise of power of Talaq, a violation of fundamental rights"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":241525,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/31\/triple-talaq-no-bar-on-granting-anticipatory-bail-for-an-offence-committed-under-the-muslim-women-protection-of-rights-on-marriage-act-2019-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":131001,"position":0},"title":"Triple Talaq| No bar on granting anticipatory bail for an offence committed under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 31, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud*, Indu Malhotra and Indira Banerjee, JJ has held that there is no bar on granting anticipatory bail for an offence committed under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act 2019, provided that the competent court must hear the married\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":328593,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/13\/legislature-only-prohibits-talaq-e-biddat-talaqs-having-effect-of-instantaneous-irrevocable-divorce-hp-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":131001,"position":1},"title":"[Mohammedan law] Legislature only prohibits Talaq-e-Biddat or Talaqs having effect of instantaneous and irrevocable divorce: Himachal Pradesh HC","author":"Arushi","date":"August 13, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In the present case, the FIR refers to the notice dated 25-04-2022, which reads that the petitioner conveyed the first communication of Talaq by pronouncing the word \u2018Talaq\u2019. It nowhere mentions that the Talaq had become irrevocable, or it had the effect of instantaneous divorce.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Himachal Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":346452,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/25\/only-talaq-e-biddat-is-prohibited-and-not-talaq-e-ahsan-bomhc\/","url_meta":{"origin":131001,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Only Talaq-e-Biddat (Triple Talaq) is prohibited and not Talaq-e-Ahsan’; Bombay HC quashes FIR against husband and his parents","author":"Simranjeet","date":"April 25, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Respondent 2 stated that the notice which her husband, Applicant 1 had given on 28-12-2023, stated that Talaq-e-Ahsan i.e., one pronouncement of Talaq, was given to her.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217502,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/31\/parliament-passes-the-muslim-women-protection-of-rights-on-marriage-bill-2019-triple-talaq-void-illegal\/","url_meta":{"origin":131001,"position":3},"title":"Triple Talaq void & illegal | Parliament passes the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2019!","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 31, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Parliament passed the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill\u00a02019, yesterday, i.e. 30-07-2019 and it would replace Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Second Ordinance, 2019. The practice of instant divorce by Muslim men will be punishable by a jail term of up to three years. This Bill\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Foreign Legislation"","block_context":{"text":"Foreign Legislation","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/foreign\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":179454,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/30\/lok-sabha-passes-bill-making-triple-talaq-unconstitutional\/","url_meta":{"origin":131001,"position":4},"title":"Lok Sabha passes Bill making Triple Talaq unconstitutional [Read Bill]","author":"Saba","date":"December 30, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"The Lok Sabha in a historic move passed the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2017 making triple talaq unconstitutional.\u00a0The Bill that seeks to protect married Muslim women from the practice of divorcing by uttering the word \u2018talaq\u2019 thrice makes talaq-e-biddat a\u201ccognizable and non-bailable offence\u201d.\u00a0The draft Bill includes\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/parliamentSM.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/parliamentSM.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/parliamentSM.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/parliamentSM.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/parliamentSM.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/parliamentSM.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":232117,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/m-p-hc-provisions-of-muslim-women-protection-of-rights-on-marriage-act-2019-are-applicable-only-against-husband-and-not-in-laws\/","url_meta":{"origin":131001,"position":5},"title":"M.P. HC | Provisions of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 are applicable only against husband and not in-laws","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 13, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court:\u00a0Shailendra Shukla, J., while addressing a anticipatory bail application, held that, \"...applicability of the provisions of The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 is only against the husband and not in-laws.\" The present anticipatory bail application was filed under Section 428 of Code of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/131001","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=131001"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/131001\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=131001"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=131001"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=131001"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}