{"id":125351,"date":"2017-04-17T20:23:40","date_gmt":"2017-04-17T14:53:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=125351"},"modified":"2017-04-26T11:50:12","modified_gmt":"2017-04-26T06:20:12","slug":"substitution-of-parts-of-an-enactment-is-nothing-but-pro-tanto-to-repeal-those-parts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/17\/substitution-of-parts-of-an-enactment-is-nothing-but-pro-tanto-to-repeal-those-parts\/","title":{"rendered":"Substitution of parts of an enactment is nothing but pro tanto to repeal those parts"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court<\/strong>: The Bench of J. Chelameswar and Abhay Manohar Sapre, JJ said that no right or liability can be created by a repealing enactment, which is inconsistent with the rights and obligations conferred under the repealed Act unless the repealing enactment makes an express declaration to that effect or adopts some other technique known to law to achieve that purpose. Giving retrospective effect to the repealing enactment is one of the techniques by which the legislature seeks to achieve that purpose.<\/p>\n

The Court was hearing the matter relating to removal of the chairman of the Mehsana District Co-operative Milk Producers Union Ltd under Section 76-B of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 for the period of 6 years. \u00a0Originally the Section provided for disqualification only for four years. But the \u201cfour years\u201d period was substituted by \u201csix years\u201d period by the Gujarat Co-operative Societies (Amendment) Act, 2015. Hence, the question before the Court was whether the period of disqualification of six years is consistent with law.<\/p>\n

The Court noticed that Section 7 of the Gujarat General Clauses Act, 1904 provides that where an enactment is repealed by a subsequent enactment, the repeal does not normally affect any investigation or legal proceedings in respect of any right, privilege, obligations, liability, penalty, forfeiture or punishment and any legal proceeding initiated during the currency of the repealed enactment could be continued as if the repealing Act has not been passed. It was further explained that repeal could be either of the entire enactment or a part of it. Substitution of parts of an enactment is nothing but pro tanto<\/em> to repeal those parts.<\/p>\n

It was held that normally when an enactment is repealed, any action initiated under that enactment dealing its currency should lapse because the authority of law for action initiated under an enactment ceases to exist on its repeal rendering the continuation of action without authority of law. However, Section 7 of the General Clauses Act seeks to preserve various rights and obligations acquired or incurred under repealed enactments. [Vipulbhai Mansingbhai Chaudhary v. State of Gujarata, 2017 SCC OnLine SC 410<\/a>, decided on 17.04.2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: The Bench of J. Chelameswar and Abhay Manohar Sapre, JJ said that no right or liability can be created by <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[2526,16021],"class_list":["post-125351","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-Interpretation","tag-repeal"],"yoast_head":"\nSubstitution of parts of an enactment is nothing but pro tanto to repeal those parts | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/17\/substitution-of-parts-of-an-enactment-is-nothing-but-pro-tanto-to-repeal-those-parts\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Substitution of parts of an enactment is nothing but pro tanto to repeal those parts\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: The Bench of J. Chelameswar and Abhay Manohar Sapre, JJ said that no right or liability can be created by\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/17\/substitution-of-parts-of-an-enactment-is-nothing-but-pro-tanto-to-repeal-those-parts\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-04-17T14:53:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-04-26T06:20:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/17\/substitution-of-parts-of-an-enactment-is-nothing-but-pro-tanto-to-repeal-those-parts\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/17\/substitution-of-parts-of-an-enactment-is-nothing-but-pro-tanto-to-repeal-those-parts\/\",\"name\":\"Substitution of parts of an enactment is nothing but pro tanto to repeal those parts | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/17\/substitution-of-parts-of-an-enactment-is-nothing-but-pro-tanto-to-repeal-those-parts\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/17\/substitution-of-parts-of-an-enactment-is-nothing-but-pro-tanto-to-repeal-those-parts\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-04-17T14:53:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-26T06:20:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/17\/substitution-of-parts-of-an-enactment-is-nothing-but-pro-tanto-to-repeal-those-parts\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/17\/substitution-of-parts-of-an-enactment-is-nothing-but-pro-tanto-to-repeal-those-parts\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/17\/substitution-of-parts-of-an-enactment-is-nothing-but-pro-tanto-to-repeal-those-parts\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/17\/substitution-of-parts-of-an-enactment-is-nothing-but-pro-tanto-to-repeal-those-parts\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Substitution of parts of an enactment is nothing but pro tanto to repeal those parts\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Substitution of parts of an enactment is nothing but pro tanto to repeal those parts | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/17\/substitution-of-parts-of-an-enactment-is-nothing-but-pro-tanto-to-repeal-those-parts\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Substitution of parts of an enactment is nothing but pro tanto to repeal those parts","og_description":"Supreme Court: The Bench of J. Chelameswar and Abhay Manohar Sapre, JJ said that no right or liability can be created by","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/17\/substitution-of-parts-of-an-enactment-is-nothing-but-pro-tanto-to-repeal-those-parts\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-04-17T14:53:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-04-26T06:20:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/17\/substitution-of-parts-of-an-enactment-is-nothing-but-pro-tanto-to-repeal-those-parts\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/17\/substitution-of-parts-of-an-enactment-is-nothing-but-pro-tanto-to-repeal-those-parts\/","name":"Substitution of parts of an enactment is nothing but pro tanto to repeal those parts | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/17\/substitution-of-parts-of-an-enactment-is-nothing-but-pro-tanto-to-repeal-those-parts\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/17\/substitution-of-parts-of-an-enactment-is-nothing-but-pro-tanto-to-repeal-those-parts\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2017-04-17T14:53:40+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-26T06:20:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/17\/substitution-of-parts-of-an-enactment-is-nothing-but-pro-tanto-to-repeal-those-parts\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/17\/substitution-of-parts-of-an-enactment-is-nothing-but-pro-tanto-to-repeal-those-parts\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/17\/substitution-of-parts-of-an-enactment-is-nothing-but-pro-tanto-to-repeal-those-parts\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/17\/substitution-of-parts-of-an-enactment-is-nothing-but-pro-tanto-to-repeal-those-parts\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Substitution of parts of an enactment is nothing but pro tanto to repeal those parts"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":319737,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/09\/repeal-of-the-repealing-amending-act-analysing-the-implications\/","url_meta":{"origin":125351,"position":0},"title":"Repeal of the Repealing\/Amending Act: Analysing the Implications","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Shivi Dangi*","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Repeal of the Repealing","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Repeal-of-the-Repealing.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Repeal-of-the-Repealing.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Repeal-of-the-Repealing.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Repeal-of-the-Repealing.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294114,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/08\/glenmark-pharmaceuticals-limited-v-state-of-tripura-a-case-comment\/","url_meta":{"origin":125351,"position":1},"title":"Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited v. State of Tripura: A case comment","author":"Editor","date":"June 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Dormaan Jamshid Dalal* and Varun Rajiv Joshi**","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"glenmark pharmaceuticals limited","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/glenmark-pharmaceuticals-limited-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/glenmark-pharmaceuticals-limited-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/glenmark-pharmaceuticals-limited-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/glenmark-pharmaceuticals-limited-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":261392,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/09\/law-passed-by-legislature-is-good-law-till-it-is-declared-unconstitutional-by-a-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":125351,"position":2},"title":"Law passed by legislature is good law till it is declared unconstitutional by a Court: Supreme Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Stating that declaration by a Court that a statute is unconstitutional obliterates that statute entirely as though it had never been passed, the Bench of L. Nageswara Rao, B.R. Gavai and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ., added that the consequences of the declaration of unconstitutionality of a statute have to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/SC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/SC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/SC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/SC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/SC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":232127,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/13\/repeal-omission-and-substitution-terms-of-oscillating-interpretations\/","url_meta":{"origin":125351,"position":3},"title":"Repeal, Omission and Substitution- Terms of Oscillating Interpretations","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 13, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by Jatin Sehgal* & Shailesh Poddar**","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Article.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Article.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Article.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Article.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Article.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":346512,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/26\/meghalaya-hc-dismisses-plea-challenging-vires-of-rajitlal-university-repealing-act-2023\/","url_meta":{"origin":125351,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Power to enact and to repeal is sole prerogative of legislature\u2019; Meghalaya HC dismisses plea challenging vires of Rajitlal University (Repealing) Act 2023","author":"Editor","date":"April 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"RITHS Trust, described as the sponsor in the Rajitlal University Act, 2011, filed the present plea. However, even after three years of the Act, the sponsors of the University had not shown any interest in approaching the State Government with an application to establish the University.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Meghalaya High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":100311,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/19\/cabinet-approves-repealing-of-obsolete-and-redundant-laws\/","url_meta":{"origin":125351,"position":5},"title":"Cabinet approves repealing of obsolete and redundant laws","author":"Saba","date":"January 19, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"The Union Cabinet chaired by the Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi has given its approval for introduction of the Repealing and Amending Bill, 2017 to repeal 105 Acts. Background:\u00a0The two Member Committee constituted by the PMO, the Law Commission of India and the Legislative Department identified 1824 redundant and obsolete\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cabinet Decisions"","block_context":{"text":"Cabinet Decisions","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/cabinet_decisions\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/125351","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=125351"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/125351\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=125351"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=125351"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=125351"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}