{"id":123161,"date":"2017-04-10T19:19:54","date_gmt":"2017-04-10T13:49:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=123161"},"modified":"2017-04-15T07:39:58","modified_gmt":"2017-04-15T02:09:58","slug":"state-cannot-urge-that-a-conveyance-deed-is-fraudulent-after-100-years-of-its-execution-and-after-acquiring-various-lands-out-of-the-very-estate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/10\/state-cannot-urge-that-a-conveyance-deed-is-fraudulent-after-100-years-of-its-execution-and-after-acquiring-various-lands-out-of-the-very-estate\/","title":{"rendered":"State cannot urge that a conveyance deed is fraudulent after 100 years of it\u2019s execution and after acquiring various lands out of the very estate"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court<\/strong>: In the petition challenging the validity of the conveyance deed of a property situated in Bangalore in favour of the Dewan of Mysore in the year 1900, the Court held that after 104 years of the execution of the original conveyance deed, and after acquiring various lands out of this very estate, it cannot permit the State to urge that the original conveyance deed is fraudulent or that the subsequent transfers are all collusive and, as such, void.<\/p>\n

In the year 2004, a complaint was sent by the Secretary of the Karnataka Public Service Commission where on the ground that in the conveyance deed it was fraudulently shown that the property had actually been purchased for the First Princess of Mysore out of her personal funds. It was alleged that the original conveyance deed dated 25.08.1900 had been executed only in favour of the Dewan of Mysore. Furthermore, no stamp duty was paid on the sale deed and, therefore, it was complained that the sale was either totally illegal or that the sale was in favour of the State of Mysore and \u201cBeaulieu\u201d estate was not the personal property of the First Princess. As a result, summary proceedings under Section 67 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 were initiated against the occupants.<\/p>\n

Holding the proceedings under the said section to be without jurisdiction, the Court explained that a bare perusal of Section 67 of the 1964 Act clearly indicates that it only applies to public roads, streets, lanes etc. or to such lands which are not the property of individuals, or an aggregate of persons legally capable of holding property. A dispute of title of property between the State and individuals cannot be decided in terms of Section 67 of the 1964 Act. Merely because the Secretary of the Karnataka Public Service Commission had, in his complaint, opined that the deed of conveyance executed more than 100 years back was fraudulently claimed to be in favour of the First Princess, was not sufficient ground to proceed under Section 67 of the 1964 Act.<\/p>\n

Considering the fact that a number of transactions relating to the said property have taken place in this large span of time, the Court said that it could not be held that all subsequent transactions relating to the estate property were fraudulent. Fraud must be pleaded and proved; it cannot be presumed. The bench of Madan B. Lokur and Deepak Gupta, JJ, hence, held that the \u201cBeaulieu\u201d estate was purchased by the Dewan of Mysore on behalf of the First Princess and the consideration was paid from the personal funds of First Princess. Therefore, the State of Karnataka has no right over the property. [M. Sankaranarayanan v. Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore, 2017 SCC OnLine SC 362<\/a>, decided on 10.04.2017]<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: In the petition challenging the validity of the conveyance deed of a property situated in Bangalore in favour of the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":27341,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[15621,15591,15611,15601],"class_list":["post-123161","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-15621","tag-conveyance-deed","tag-karnataka-land-revenue-act","tag-property-law"],"yoast_head":"\nState cannot urge that a conveyance deed is fraudulent after 100 years of it\u2019s execution and after acquiring various lands out of the very estate | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/10\/state-cannot-urge-that-a-conveyance-deed-is-fraudulent-after-100-years-of-its-execution-and-after-acquiring-various-lands-out-of-the-very-estate\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State cannot urge that a conveyance deed is fraudulent after 100 years of it\u2019s execution and after acquiring various lands out of the very estate\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: In the petition challenging the validity of the conveyance deed of a property situated in Bangalore in favour of the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/10\/state-cannot-urge-that-a-conveyance-deed-is-fraudulent-after-100-years-of-its-execution-and-after-acquiring-various-lands-out-of-the-very-estate\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-04-10T13:49:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-04-15T02:09:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1280\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/10\/state-cannot-urge-that-a-conveyance-deed-is-fraudulent-after-100-years-of-its-execution-and-after-acquiring-various-lands-out-of-the-very-estate\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/10\/state-cannot-urge-that-a-conveyance-deed-is-fraudulent-after-100-years-of-its-execution-and-after-acquiring-various-lands-out-of-the-very-estate\/\",\"name\":\"State cannot urge that a conveyance deed is fraudulent after 100 years of it\u2019s execution and after acquiring various lands out of the very estate | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/10\/state-cannot-urge-that-a-conveyance-deed-is-fraudulent-after-100-years-of-its-execution-and-after-acquiring-various-lands-out-of-the-very-estate\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/10\/state-cannot-urge-that-a-conveyance-deed-is-fraudulent-after-100-years-of-its-execution-and-after-acquiring-various-lands-out-of-the-very-estate\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-04-10T13:49:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-15T02:09:58+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/10\/state-cannot-urge-that-a-conveyance-deed-is-fraudulent-after-100-years-of-its-execution-and-after-acquiring-various-lands-out-of-the-very-estate\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/10\/state-cannot-urge-that-a-conveyance-deed-is-fraudulent-after-100-years-of-its-execution-and-after-acquiring-various-lands-out-of-the-very-estate\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/10\/state-cannot-urge-that-a-conveyance-deed-is-fraudulent-after-100-years-of-its-execution-and-after-acquiring-various-lands-out-of-the-very-estate\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1280},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/10\/state-cannot-urge-that-a-conveyance-deed-is-fraudulent-after-100-years-of-its-execution-and-after-acquiring-various-lands-out-of-the-very-estate\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State cannot urge that a conveyance deed is fraudulent after 100 years of it\u2019s execution and after acquiring various lands out of the very estate\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State cannot urge that a conveyance deed is fraudulent after 100 years of it\u2019s execution and after acquiring various lands out of the very estate | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/10\/state-cannot-urge-that-a-conveyance-deed-is-fraudulent-after-100-years-of-its-execution-and-after-acquiring-various-lands-out-of-the-very-estate\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State cannot urge that a conveyance deed is fraudulent after 100 years of it\u2019s execution and after acquiring various lands out of the very estate","og_description":"Supreme Court: In the petition challenging the validity of the conveyance deed of a property situated in Bangalore in favour of the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/10\/state-cannot-urge-that-a-conveyance-deed-is-fraudulent-after-100-years-of-its-execution-and-after-acquiring-various-lands-out-of-the-very-estate\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-04-10T13:49:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-04-15T02:09:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1280,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/10\/state-cannot-urge-that-a-conveyance-deed-is-fraudulent-after-100-years-of-its-execution-and-after-acquiring-various-lands-out-of-the-very-estate\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/10\/state-cannot-urge-that-a-conveyance-deed-is-fraudulent-after-100-years-of-its-execution-and-after-acquiring-various-lands-out-of-the-very-estate\/","name":"State cannot urge that a conveyance deed is fraudulent after 100 years of it\u2019s execution and after acquiring various lands out of the very estate | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/10\/state-cannot-urge-that-a-conveyance-deed-is-fraudulent-after-100-years-of-its-execution-and-after-acquiring-various-lands-out-of-the-very-estate\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/10\/state-cannot-urge-that-a-conveyance-deed-is-fraudulent-after-100-years-of-its-execution-and-after-acquiring-various-lands-out-of-the-very-estate\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg","datePublished":"2017-04-10T13:49:54+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-15T02:09:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/10\/state-cannot-urge-that-a-conveyance-deed-is-fraudulent-after-100-years-of-its-execution-and-after-acquiring-various-lands-out-of-the-very-estate\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/10\/state-cannot-urge-that-a-conveyance-deed-is-fraudulent-after-100-years-of-its-execution-and-after-acquiring-various-lands-out-of-the-very-estate\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/10\/state-cannot-urge-that-a-conveyance-deed-is-fraudulent-after-100-years-of-its-execution-and-after-acquiring-various-lands-out-of-the-very-estate\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg","width":1920,"height":1280},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/10\/state-cannot-urge-that-a-conveyance-deed-is-fraudulent-after-100-years-of-its-execution-and-after-acquiring-various-lands-out-of-the-very-estate\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State cannot urge that a conveyance deed is fraudulent after 100 years of it\u2019s execution and after acquiring various lands out of the very estate"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":244598,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/27\/conveyance-deed\/","url_meta":{"origin":123161,"position":0},"title":"NCDRC | Conveyance Deed forced on apartments buyers in lieu of Apartment Deed? Commission says it cannot go beyond express terms of the agreement entered into between parties","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): C. Viswanath (Presiding Member) dismissed the complaint while granting an opportunity to the Complainant to approach any Appropriate Forum\/ Authority of Court. The instant complaint was filed under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Complainant a resident and owner of an apartment\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324179,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/12\/sc-ruling-on-refund-stamp-duty-for-un-executed-conveyance-deed\/","url_meta":{"origin":123161,"position":1},"title":"Supreme Court rules on refund of stamp duty for an un-executed conveyance deed and fraudulent transaction","author":"Editor","date":"June 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The appellant paid the stamp duty of Rs.25,34,350 and purchased the stamp duty for registration of conveyance deed. However, the conveyance deed was not registered as the vendor had earlier sold the property in question to a third party in 1992.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court on refund of stamp duty","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Supreme-Court-on-refund-of-stamp-duty.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Supreme-Court-on-refund-of-stamp-duty.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Supreme-Court-on-refund-of-stamp-duty.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Supreme-Court-on-refund-of-stamp-duty.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":360450,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/17\/bom-hc-rejects-suit-over-draft-conveyance-deed-for-being-time-barred\/","url_meta":{"origin":123161,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Plaint failed to disclose cause of action and was barred by limitation\u2019; Bombay HC dismisses suit for specific performance of draft conveyance deed","author":"Editor","date":"September 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cUnder Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, there is a requirement of consensus ad idem between the Parties with respect to the fundamental terms of the sale.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"specific performance unregistered conveyance deed","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/specific-performance-unregistered-conveyance-deed.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/specific-performance-unregistered-conveyance-deed.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/specific-performance-unregistered-conveyance-deed.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/specific-performance-unregistered-conveyance-deed.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":206903,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/17\/sc-explains-high-courts-jurisdiction-in-regard-to-scope-of-deciding-a-note-for-clarification-of-minutes\/","url_meta":{"origin":123161,"position":3},"title":"SC explains High Court’s jurisdiction in regard to scope of deciding a “Note for clarification of Minutes”","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 17, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court:\u00a0A Bench comprising of A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan and M.R. Shah, JJ. disposed of a matter concerning execution of conveyance deed and set aside the orders passed by Bombay High Court for want of jurisdiction. The present proceeding arose out of a suit filed by original plaintiffs-- purchasers of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266043,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/stamp-duty-split-instrucment-once-already-charged-supreme-court-judgments-legal-law-research-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":123161,"position":4},"title":"Reduction in stamp duty cannot lead to revenue splitting an instrument into two once it has already been charged under a correct charging provision: Supreme Court\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: While dealing with a case under the Gujarat\u00a0Stamp\u00a0Act,\u00a01958, the bench of Hemant Gupta and V. Ramasubramanian*, JJ has held that once a single instrument has been charged under a correct charging provision of the Statute, namely Article 20(a), the Revenue cannot split the instrument into two, because of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-146-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-146-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-146-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-146-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-146-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291076,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/supreme-court-stamp-duty-on-sale-deed-can-be-calculated-on-market-value-of-property\/","url_meta":{"origin":123161,"position":5},"title":"Whether stamp duty payable on sale deed to be calculated as per prevailing market value of property on execution date? Supreme Court answers","author":"Aastha","date":"May 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cStamp Act in its application to Uttar Pradesh has been amended by the UP (Stamp Amendment Act 1952) and Article 23 of Schedule IB as applicable to UP.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"stamp duty on sale deed","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/stamp-duty-on-sale-deed.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/stamp-duty-on-sale-deed.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/stamp-duty-on-sale-deed.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/stamp-duty-on-sale-deed.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123161","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=123161"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123161\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/27341"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=123161"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=123161"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=123161"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}