{"id":115461,"date":"2017-03-27T16:28:25","date_gmt":"2017-03-27T10:58:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=115461"},"modified":"2017-03-27T16:28:25","modified_gmt":"2017-03-27T10:58:25","slug":"2017-scc-vol-3-march-21-2017-part-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/27\/2017-scc-vol-3-march-21-2017-part-1\/","title":{"rendered":"2017 SCC Vol. 3 March 21, 2017 Part 1"},"content":{"rendered":"

Constitution of India \u2014 Art. 136 \u2014 Grant\/Dismissal of SLP \u2014 Dismissal of SLP \u2014 When warranted:<\/strong> Supreme Court most focus on significant and important cases. Exercise of power while entertaining SLPs is purely discretionary. Availability of alternative remedies and mounting pendency of cases coupled with relative insignificance of legal injury, are factors to be weighed while entertaining SLPs. [Reena Suresh Alhat v. State of Maharashtra,\u00a0(2017) 3 SCC 119<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Constitution of India \u2014 Arts. 213 & 123 and Arts. 249(3), 250(2), 357, 358(1) & 359(1-A) \u2014 Obliteration of rights, privileges, obligations or liabilities under an Ordinance upon its ceasing to operate:<\/strong> Laying of Ordinance before the legislative is mandatory. Repromulgation of Ordinances is constitutionally impermissible. Upon an Ordinance ceasing, no rights, privileges, obligations or liabilities survive except where pubic interest or constitutional necessity is demonstrated. [Krishna Kumar Singh v. State of Bihar,\u00a0(2017) 3 SCC 1<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Constitution of India \u2014 Arts. 226 and 32:<\/strong> As interim order have serious consequences on main relief sought i.e. private university (till date) would henceforth be treated by UGC as State University, said interim order stayed and status quo directed to be maintained till writ petition is disposed of by High Court. [University Grants Commission v. Maharishi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Vishwavidyalaya,\u00a0(2017) 3 SCC 114<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 \u2014 Ss. 239 and 482 and S. 227 \u2014 Discharge \u2014 Proper forum for:<\/strong> Appropriate application under S. 239 must be filed before Magistrate. It is for Magistrate to consider contentions regarding discharge therein. [Umesh v. State of Kerala,\u00a0(2017) 3 SCC 112<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Employees\u2019 Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 \u2014 S. 14-B \u2014 Imposition of damages for default in payment of provident fund dues:<\/strong> Since presence or absence of mens rea and\/or actus reus would be a determinative factor in imposing damages under S. 14-B and High Court or appellate authority or original authority found no mens rea and\/or actus reus, respondent(s) could not be held liable under S. 14-B. [Provident Fund Commr. v. RSL Textiles (India) (P) Ltd.,\u00a0(2017) 3 SCC 110<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Land Acquisition Act, 1894 \u2014 Ss. 4(1) & 6 and 13-A:<\/strong> Once award is passed, there is no question of any correction in notification under S. 4(1) or declaration under S. 6. S. 13-A provides for correction of clerical mistakes in award and that too only within six months. There is no question of an award being passed in respect of a property, for which there is no notification under S. 4(1) and consequently, declaration under S. 6. [State of U.P. v. Abdul Ali,\u00a0(2017) 3 SCC 108<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Limitation Act, 1963 \u2014 Art. 134 and S. 15 \u2014 Sale in execution of decree \u2014 \u201cWhen sale becomes absolute\u201d:<\/strong> Sale becomes absolute on termination of proceedings initiated to set aside order of confirmation of sale as per Or. 21 R. 92(1) CPC, not on mere passing of such confirmation order. [United Finance Corpn. v. M.S.M. Haneefa,\u00a0(2017) 3 SCC 123<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Preventive Detention \u2014 Grounds of detention \u2014 Relevancy of\/Validity of\/Inconsistencies in\/Defects in grounds:<\/strong> Where detention order is based on more than one grounds, independent of each other, detention order would survive even if one of the grounds is found to be non-existing or legally unsustainable. However, where detention order is founded on one composite ground it would be vitiated if such ground is found fault with. Further held, \u201cgrounds\u201d are basic facts on which conclusions are founded which are different from subsidiary facts or further particulars of basic facts. [Gautam Jain v. Union of India,\u00a0(2017) 3 SCC 133<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Tort Law \u2014 Negligence \u2014 Compensation \u2014 Quantification of, without material evidence and based on assumptions and presumptions:<\/strong> In this case of electrocution suffered by 8 yr old boy, which resulted in amputation of both arms, High Court was correct in holding that victim would have earned about Rs 30,000 p.m. as these conclusions are based on proper materials, hence, no interference therein called for. But award of compensation of (i) Rs 10,00,000 towards loss of companionship, life amenities\/pleasure and happiness; (ii) Rs 10,00,000 for pain and suffering, mental distress, trauma and discomfort and inconvenience; (iii) Rs 10,00,000 towards attendant\/nursing expenses; and (iv) Rs 5,00,000 for securing artificial\/robotic limbs and future medical expenses, are on the higher side. There is no evidence to support award of compensation under these heads and such quantification is based on assumptions and presumptions. Entitlement for compensation under these heads is one thing and quantum of compensation under these heads is another thing, hence, sum reduced from Rs 1,25,00,000 to Rs 90,00,000 with 6% interest. [State of H.P. v. Naval Kumar,\u00a0(2017) 3 SCC 115<\/a>]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Constitution of India \u2014 Art. 136 \u2014 Grant\/Dismissal of SLP \u2014 Dismissal of SLP \u2014 When warranted: Supreme Court most focus on <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":116031,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[13041],"class_list":["post-115461","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases","tag-cases-reported-in-scc"],"yoast_head":"\n2017 SCC Vol. 3 March 21, 2017 Part 1 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/27\/2017-scc-vol-3-march-21-2017-part-1\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2017 SCC Vol. 3 March 21, 2017 Part 1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Constitution of India \u2014 Art. 136 \u2014 Grant\/Dismissal of SLP \u2014 Dismissal of SLP \u2014 When warranted: Supreme Court most focus on\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/27\/2017-scc-vol-3-march-21-2017-part-1\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-03-27T10:58:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/scc-cover-21-03-2017.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/27\/2017-scc-vol-3-march-21-2017-part-1\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/27\/2017-scc-vol-3-march-21-2017-part-1\/\",\"name\":\"2017 SCC Vol. 3 March 21, 2017 Part 1 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/27\/2017-scc-vol-3-march-21-2017-part-1\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/27\/2017-scc-vol-3-march-21-2017-part-1\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/scc-cover-21-03-2017.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-03-27T10:58:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/27\/2017-scc-vol-3-march-21-2017-part-1\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/27\/2017-scc-vol-3-march-21-2017-part-1\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/27\/2017-scc-vol-3-march-21-2017-part-1\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/scc-cover-21-03-2017.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/scc-cover-21-03-2017.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/27\/2017-scc-vol-3-march-21-2017-part-1\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2017 SCC Vol. 3 March 21, 2017 Part 1\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2017 SCC Vol. 3 March 21, 2017 Part 1 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/27\/2017-scc-vol-3-march-21-2017-part-1\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2017 SCC Vol. 3 March 21, 2017 Part 1","og_description":"Constitution of India \u2014 Art. 136 \u2014 Grant\/Dismissal of SLP \u2014 Dismissal of SLP \u2014 When warranted: Supreme Court most focus on","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/27\/2017-scc-vol-3-march-21-2017-part-1\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-03-27T10:58:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/scc-cover-21-03-2017.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/27\/2017-scc-vol-3-march-21-2017-part-1\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/27\/2017-scc-vol-3-march-21-2017-part-1\/","name":"2017 SCC Vol. 3 March 21, 2017 Part 1 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/27\/2017-scc-vol-3-march-21-2017-part-1\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/27\/2017-scc-vol-3-march-21-2017-part-1\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/scc-cover-21-03-2017.jpg","datePublished":"2017-03-27T10:58:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/27\/2017-scc-vol-3-march-21-2017-part-1\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/27\/2017-scc-vol-3-march-21-2017-part-1\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/27\/2017-scc-vol-3-march-21-2017-part-1\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/scc-cover-21-03-2017.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/scc-cover-21-03-2017.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/27\/2017-scc-vol-3-march-21-2017-part-1\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2017 SCC Vol. 3 March 21, 2017 Part 1"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/scc-cover-21-03-2017.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":255138,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/04\/dismissal-of-slp-by-reasoned-order-would-not-attract-doctrine-of-merger-but-will-be-binding-on-all-courts-tribunals-in-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":115461,"position":0},"title":"Dismissal of SLP by reasoned order would not attract doctrine of merger but will be binding on all courts\/tribunals in India","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 4, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Explaining the doctrine of merger in case of dismissal of Special Leave Petitions (SLPs), the bench of L. Nageswara Rao and BR Gavai*, JJ has held that doctrine of merger would not attract and that it doesn\u2019t matter if the SLP has been dismissed by a non-speaking order\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":308020,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/29\/opening-the-slp-floodgates-impacts-access-to-justice\/","url_meta":{"origin":115461,"position":1},"title":"Opening the SLP Floodgates Impacts Access to Justice","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Murali Neelakantan* and Gautam Narayan** Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 81","rel":"","context":"In "Experts Corner"","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SLP in Supreme Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/opening-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/opening-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/opening-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/opening-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":96811,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/03\/re-promulgation-of-ordinances-is-a-fraud-on-the-constitution-and-a-sub-version-of-democratic-legislative-processes\/","url_meta":{"origin":115461,"position":2},"title":"Re-promulgation of ordinances is a fraud on the Constitution and a subversion of democratic legislative processes","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 3, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Stating that re-promulgation of ordinances is a fraud on the Constitution and a subversion of democratic legislative processes, the 7 judge bench held that the Ordinance making power does not constitute the President or the Governor into a parallel source of law making or an independent legislative authority.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":251467,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/19\/2021-scc-vol-4-part-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":115461,"position":3},"title":"2021 SCC Vol. 4 Part 2","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 19, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Constitution of India \u2014 Art. 226 \u2014 PIL: In this case there were allegations that PIL writ petition before High Court in this case was initiated at instance of SLP petitioner herein and others mala fide, and with vested interest, etc. Enquiry to determine that whether the audio recording on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":203894,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/22\/2018-scc-vol-9-october-21-2018-part-1\/","url_meta":{"origin":115461,"position":4},"title":"2018 SCC Vol. 9 October 21, 2018 Part 1","author":"Saba","date":"October 22, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 S. 34 and S. 13(6) \u2014 Practice and procedure qua applications made for setting aside an award under S. 34: An application for setting aside an arbitral award will not ordinarily require anything beyond the record that was before the arbitrator. However, if there\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":225507,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/12\/chh-hc-laying-of-an-ordinance-before-state-legislature-sub-serves-the-purpose-of-legislative-control-over-the-ordinance-making-power\/","url_meta":{"origin":115461,"position":5},"title":"Chh HC | Laying of an Ordinance before State Legislature sub-serves the purpose of legislative control over the ordinance-making power","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 12, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court:\u00a0Goutam Bhaduri, J., while dismissing the present petition held that, Legislature has before it a full panoply of legislative powers and as an incident of those powers, the express constitutional authority to disapprove an ordinance. If an ordinance has to continue beyond the tenure which is prescribed by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115461","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=115461"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115461\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/116031"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=115461"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=115461"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=115461"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}