{"id":110851,"date":"2017-03-02T14:51:49","date_gmt":"2017-03-02T09:21:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=110851"},"modified":"2017-03-24T13:18:09","modified_gmt":"2017-03-24T07:48:09","slug":"appeal-challenging-collegium-recommendations-devoid-of-merit-delhi-high-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/02\/appeal-challenging-collegium-recommendations-devoid-of-merit-delhi-high-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Appeal challenging Collegium recommendations devoid of merit: Delhi High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:<\/strong>\u00a0Mr. R.P. Luthra, \u00a0a practising advocate had filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court challenging the recommendation of four names by the Supreme Court Collegium in May, 2016 and certain other reliefs including a declaration that the judgments passed by the Supreme Court from time to time with regard to mechanism of appointment of judges are unconstitutional. The writ petition was dismissed by the Single bench stating that a High Court cannot declare Supreme Court\u2019s judgment as per incuriam and that the question of suitability or merits of a candidate cannot be made the subject matter of judicial review in a writ proceeding.<\/p>\n

Now, the petitioner had appealed against the order before Division Bench contending that the same had been passed without affording adequate opportunity to the petitioner to argue the matter. He also referred to the fact that the name of a practicing Advocate had been recommended by the Collegium by the impugned recommendation without considering the candidature of appellant and other similarly placed lawyers and therefore, contended that it was violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution. He further submitted that the recommendation of the Collegium being an administrative act is open to judicial review under Article 226 referring to Centre for PIL v. Union of India, (2011) 4 SCC 1<\/a>. The Division Bench rejected the contention stating that there is a basic difference between \u2018eligibility\u2019 and \u2018suitability\u2019 citing Mahesh Chandra Gupta<\/em> v. Union of India<\/em>, (2009) 8 SCC 273<\/a>, in which it was held that the appointment of a Judge of the High Court\/Supreme Court requires \u2018consultation\u2019 and fitness of a person to be appointed is evaluated in the consultation process. Therefore, the evaluation of the worth and merit of a person is a matter entirely different from eligibility of a candidate for elevation, the Bench held.<\/p>\n

The advocate also contended that the Collegium should not have made the recommendation without finalising the Memorandum of Procedure for improvement of the Collegium System of appointment of Judges suggested by the Constitution Bench\u00a0vide judgment dated 16.10.2015 in Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association<\/em> v. Union of India<\/em>, (2016) 5 SCC 1<\/a>. To this, the Court reverted that\u00a0in the light of the order of the Constitution Bench in 2015 SCC OnLine SC 1224<\/a>\u00a0dated 19.11.2015 in which while reserving the order, it was made clear that\u00a0the process of appointment of Judges by the Collegium system need not\u00a0remain on hold.\u00a0\u00a0The appeal was dismissed accordingly. [RP Luthra v. Union of India, 2017 SCC OnLine Del 7239<\/a>, decided on 01.03.2017]<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0Mr. R.P. Luthra, \u00a0a practising advocate had filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court challenging the recommendation of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[14501,7292,13681,14491,7601],"class_list":["post-110851","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-artice-19","tag-article-14","tag-article-21","tag-collegium","tag-constitution-of-india"],"yoast_head":"\nAppeal challenging Collegium recommendations devoid of merit: Delhi High Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/02\/appeal-challenging-collegium-recommendations-devoid-of-merit-delhi-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Appeal challenging Collegium recommendations devoid of merit: Delhi High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Mr. R.P. Luthra, \u00a0a practising advocate had filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court challenging the recommendation of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/02\/appeal-challenging-collegium-recommendations-devoid-of-merit-delhi-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-03-02T09:21:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-24T07:48:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/02\/appeal-challenging-collegium-recommendations-devoid-of-merit-delhi-high-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/02\/appeal-challenging-collegium-recommendations-devoid-of-merit-delhi-high-court\/\",\"name\":\"Appeal challenging Collegium recommendations devoid of merit: Delhi High Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-03-02T09:21:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-24T07:48:09+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/02\/appeal-challenging-collegium-recommendations-devoid-of-merit-delhi-high-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/02\/appeal-challenging-collegium-recommendations-devoid-of-merit-delhi-high-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/02\/appeal-challenging-collegium-recommendations-devoid-of-merit-delhi-high-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Appeal challenging Collegium recommendations devoid of merit: Delhi High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Appeal challenging Collegium recommendations devoid of merit: Delhi High Court | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/02\/appeal-challenging-collegium-recommendations-devoid-of-merit-delhi-high-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Appeal challenging Collegium recommendations devoid of merit: Delhi High Court","og_description":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Mr. R.P. Luthra, \u00a0a practising advocate had filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court challenging the recommendation of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/02\/appeal-challenging-collegium-recommendations-devoid-of-merit-delhi-high-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-03-02T09:21:49+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-24T07:48:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/02\/appeal-challenging-collegium-recommendations-devoid-of-merit-delhi-high-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/02\/appeal-challenging-collegium-recommendations-devoid-of-merit-delhi-high-court\/","name":"Appeal challenging Collegium recommendations devoid of merit: Delhi High Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-03-02T09:21:49+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-24T07:48:09+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/02\/appeal-challenging-collegium-recommendations-devoid-of-merit-delhi-high-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/02\/appeal-challenging-collegium-recommendations-devoid-of-merit-delhi-high-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/02\/appeal-challenging-collegium-recommendations-devoid-of-merit-delhi-high-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Appeal challenging Collegium recommendations devoid of merit: Delhi High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":323357,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/01\/del-hc-dismisses-pil-seeking-transparency-judicial-appointment-process-publicity-interest-litigation-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":110851,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Purely a Publicity Interest Litigation\u2019; Delhi High Court dismisses PIL seeking transparency in Judicial Appointment Process","author":"Arunima","date":"June 1, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The only personal interest of the Petitioner as stated in the petition is that the Petitioner has a case pending in Rohini District Court, Delhi. This Court is at a loss to understand how the delay in disposal of his case in the District Court is anyway connected to the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325793,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/delhi-hc-dismisses-appeal-filed-for-lack-of-appointment-of-judges-to-high-courts-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":110851,"position":1},"title":"Delhi HC dismisses appeal filed for lack of appointment of judges to the High Courts","author":"Editor","date":"July 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court said that the directions sought were not only beyond but also contrary to the law laid down by the Supreme Court.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":198193,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/06\/cji-is-the-master-of-roster-chief-justice-cannot-be-read-as-collegium-for-allocation-of-matters-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":110851,"position":2},"title":"CJI is the Master of Roster; \u201cChief Justice\u201d cannot be read as \u201cCollegium\u201d for allocation of matters: Supreme Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 6, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is difficult to accept the prayer of the petitioner that the expression 'Chief Justice' appearing in the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 be read as \u2018Collegium\u2019 of first five senior most Judges for the purpose of allocating the matters. At the same time, we feel that debate generated as a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":59271,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/01\/petition-dealing-with-challenge-to-collegium-system-remitted-to-be-reconsidered-afresh-on-maintainability\/","url_meta":{"origin":110851,"position":3},"title":"Petition dealing with challenge to collegium system remitted, to be reconsidered afresh on maintainability","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 1, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Deciding the appeal\u00a0 preferred against the Single Judge's order in an un-numbered writ petition challenging the collegium system of appointment of Judges, the Division Bench of Abdul Rehim and Sudheendra Kumar, JJ.\u00a0 remitted the matter back for fresh consideration on the question of maintainability. The Registry of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":341184,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/12\/tejas-karia-partner-sam-appointed-as-judge-of-delhi-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":110851,"position":4},"title":"Tejas Karia, Partner, SAM appointed as Judge of Delhi High Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 12, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court Collegium recommended his appointment on 29-08-2024.","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Tejas-Karia1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Tejas-Karia1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Tejas-Karia1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Tejas-Karia1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":329601,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/29\/advocate-tejas-dhirenbhai-karia-delhi-hc-judge-recommendation-sc-collegium-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":110851,"position":5},"title":"SC Collegium recommends appointment of Advocate Tejas Dhirenbhai Karia, as Judge of Delhi High Court","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 29, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Collegium noted that Advocate Karia is a domain expert in the law of arbitration and has extensive experience in conducting arbitrations, both domestic and international.","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Advocate Tejas Dhirenbhai Karia Delhi Judge arbitration","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Advocate-Tejas-Dhirenbhai-Karia-Delhi-Judge-arbitration.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Advocate-Tejas-Dhirenbhai-Karia-Delhi-Judge-arbitration.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Advocate-Tejas-Dhirenbhai-Karia-Delhi-Judge-arbitration.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Advocate-Tejas-Dhirenbhai-Karia-Delhi-Judge-arbitration.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110851","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110851"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110851\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110851"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110851"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110851"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}