{"id":110591,"date":"2017-03-14T18:30:35","date_gmt":"2017-03-14T13:00:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=110591"},"modified":"2017-03-31T15:18:27","modified_gmt":"2017-03-31T09:48:27","slug":"dismissal-and-withdrawal-of-slp-cant-be-treated-at-par-for-the-purpose-of-filing-review-petition-in-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/14\/dismissal-and-withdrawal-of-slp-cant-be-treated-at-par-for-the-purpose-of-filing-review-petition-in-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Dismissal and withdrawal of SLP can\u2019t be treated at par for the purpose of filing review petition in HC"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:<\/strong>\u00a0An order passed by the Delhi High Court disposed off the preliminary objection to the maintainability of the review petition, on the ground that the Special Leave Petition (SLP) preferred against the order of which review is sought had been dismissed. A review was sought of the judgment delivered in 2012 and an SLP against the judgment was preferred by the petitioners before Supreme Court.<\/p>\n

The petitioners had applied for the correction\/rectification of an error in the impugned order averring that once the Supreme Court permits withdrawal of a SLP without recording reasons, it is as if no appeal was ever filed or entertained since in the absence of grant of special leave, there is no appeal in existence. It was further contended that where a SLP is permitted to be withdrawn and equally when it is dismissed in limine without recording reasons, the High Court\u2019s judgment then is not affected in any manner by the filing and subsequent withdrawal or dismissal of the SLP. For this, the counsel for the petitioner referred to Kunhayammed<\/em> v. State of Kerala<\/em>, \u00a0(2000) 6 SCC 359<\/a> in which the Supreme Court was specifically concerned with the issue of maintainability of review petition wherein, it held that a review petition can be filed subsequent to the dismissal of an SLP and that only when the Supreme Court grants leave in SLP and converts it into an appeal and the appeal thereafter is disposed of with or without reasons, that the judgment of the Supreme Court merges with that of the High Court.<\/p>\n

The Court noticed the fact in the case before it that the petitioners while seeking to withdraw the SLP also sought liberty to move the High Court in review petition but the Supreme Court merely dismissed the SLP as withdrawn and has not stated that the liberty sought had been granted and observed that Rule 9 of Order XV titled \u201cPetitions Generally\u201d of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 provides for withdrawal of the petition which further states that once a proceeding \/petition is permitted to be withdrawn, the effect of such withdrawal is as if, it had not been preferred.\u00a0On this, the Bench held that the withdrawal of the petition can not be treated at par with dismissal of the petition and decided the objection in favour of review\u00a0petitioners. [Kanoria Industries Ltd. v. UOI, 2017 SCC OnLine Del 7215<\/a>, decided on 27.02.2017]<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0An order passed by the Delhi High Court disposed off the preliminary objection to the maintainability of the review petition, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[4841,14801],"class_list":["post-110591","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-review-petition","tag-special-leave-petition"],"yoast_head":"\nDismissal and withdrawal of SLP can\u2019t be treated at par for the purpose of filing review petition in HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/14\/dismissal-and-withdrawal-of-slp-cant-be-treated-at-par-for-the-purpose-of-filing-review-petition-in-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dismissal and withdrawal of SLP can\u2019t be treated at par for the purpose of filing review petition in HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court:\u00a0An order passed by the Delhi High Court disposed off the preliminary objection to the maintainability of the review petition,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/14\/dismissal-and-withdrawal-of-slp-cant-be-treated-at-par-for-the-purpose-of-filing-review-petition-in-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-03-14T13:00:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-31T09:48:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/14\/dismissal-and-withdrawal-of-slp-cant-be-treated-at-par-for-the-purpose-of-filing-review-petition-in-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/14\/dismissal-and-withdrawal-of-slp-cant-be-treated-at-par-for-the-purpose-of-filing-review-petition-in-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Dismissal and withdrawal of SLP can\u2019t be treated at par for the purpose of filing review petition in HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-03-14T13:00:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-31T09:48:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/14\/dismissal-and-withdrawal-of-slp-cant-be-treated-at-par-for-the-purpose-of-filing-review-petition-in-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/14\/dismissal-and-withdrawal-of-slp-cant-be-treated-at-par-for-the-purpose-of-filing-review-petition-in-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/14\/dismissal-and-withdrawal-of-slp-cant-be-treated-at-par-for-the-purpose-of-filing-review-petition-in-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dismissal and withdrawal of SLP can\u2019t be treated at par for the purpose of filing review petition in HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dismissal and withdrawal of SLP can\u2019t be treated at par for the purpose of filing review petition in HC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/14\/dismissal-and-withdrawal-of-slp-cant-be-treated-at-par-for-the-purpose-of-filing-review-petition-in-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dismissal and withdrawal of SLP can\u2019t be treated at par for the purpose of filing review petition in HC","og_description":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0An order passed by the Delhi High Court disposed off the preliminary objection to the maintainability of the review petition,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/14\/dismissal-and-withdrawal-of-slp-cant-be-treated-at-par-for-the-purpose-of-filing-review-petition-in-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-03-14T13:00:35+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-31T09:48:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/14\/dismissal-and-withdrawal-of-slp-cant-be-treated-at-par-for-the-purpose-of-filing-review-petition-in-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/14\/dismissal-and-withdrawal-of-slp-cant-be-treated-at-par-for-the-purpose-of-filing-review-petition-in-hc\/","name":"Dismissal and withdrawal of SLP can\u2019t be treated at par for the purpose of filing review petition in HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-03-14T13:00:35+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-31T09:48:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/14\/dismissal-and-withdrawal-of-slp-cant-be-treated-at-par-for-the-purpose-of-filing-review-petition-in-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/14\/dismissal-and-withdrawal-of-slp-cant-be-treated-at-par-for-the-purpose-of-filing-review-petition-in-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/14\/dismissal-and-withdrawal-of-slp-cant-be-treated-at-par-for-the-purpose-of-filing-review-petition-in-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dismissal and withdrawal of SLP can\u2019t be treated at par for the purpose of filing review petition in HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":236778,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/05\/is-slp-challenging-dismissal-of-review-petition-by-hc-maintainable-when-main-judgment-is-not-under-challenge-sc-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":110591,"position":0},"title":"Is SLP against an order rejecting the review petition maintainable when main judgment is not under challenge? SC answers","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and MR Shah has reiterated that when the main judgment of the High Court has not been challenged, no relief can be granted by this Court in the special leave petition filed against order rejecting review application to review the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":221627,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/","url_meta":{"origin":110591,"position":1},"title":"P&H HC | High Court can exercise review jurisdiction during the pendency of SLP and also after its dismissal (by a speaking or non-speaking order)","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 31, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Division Bench of Daya Chaudhary and Sudhir Mittal, JJ. dismissed the review application filed by a person against the order passed by the State of Punjab regarding the inter se merit of sportspersons. An order was issued by the State of Punjab giving directions\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":222924,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/06\/ipabs-non-provision-to-appeal-to-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":110591,"position":2},"title":"IPAB’S Non Provision to appeal to Supreme Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 6, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"The applicants of all Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) can directly file a Special Leave Petition (SLP) before the Hon\u2019ble Supreme Court against any order of Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB). They can also prefer a writ petition before the High Court against orders of IPAB and IP offices by invoking\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":365246,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/30\/doctrine-of-merger-not-attracted-by-dismissed-slp-jk-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":110591,"position":3},"title":"Dismissal of SLP by Supreme Court with or without reasons, will not attract the Doctrine of Merger: J&K and Ladakh HC","author":"Editor","date":"October 30, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhile exercising the review jurisdiction, it must be borne in mind that review proceedings are not by way of an appeal and must strictly be confined to the scope of Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Doctrine of Merger","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/jk-86.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/jk-86.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/jk-86.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/jk-86.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255138,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/04\/dismissal-of-slp-by-reasoned-order-would-not-attract-doctrine-of-merger-but-will-be-binding-on-all-courts-tribunals-in-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":110591,"position":4},"title":"Dismissal of SLP by reasoned order would not attract doctrine of merger but will be binding on all courts\/tribunals in India","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 4, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Explaining the doctrine of merger in case of dismissal of Special Leave Petitions (SLPs), the bench of L. Nageswara Rao and BR Gavai*, JJ has held that doctrine of merger would not attract and that it doesn\u2019t matter if the SLP has been dismissed by a non-speaking order\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279650,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/15\/allahabad-high-court-stays-criminal-proceedings-against-delhi-cm-arvind-kejriwal-as-slp-is-pending-in-supreme-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":110591,"position":5},"title":"Allahabad High Court stays criminal proceedings against Delhi’s CM Arvind Kejriwal as SLP is pending in Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"December 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Criminal proceedings against Arvind Kejriwal in Sultanpur Court have been stayed by Allahabad High Court, considering that special leave to appeal is still pending in Supreme Court and if it is allowed, then the entire proceedings would be a futile exercise.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image31.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110591","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110591"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110591\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110591"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110591"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110591"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}