{"id":107521,"date":"2017-02-17T19:56:09","date_gmt":"2017-02-17T14:26:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=107521"},"modified":"2017-03-02T17:11:26","modified_gmt":"2017-03-02T11:41:26","slug":"landlord-cannot-be-non-suited-due-to-mere-non-examination-of-family-member-who-intends-to-do-business-in-the-rented-premises","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/17\/landlord-cannot-be-non-suited-due-to-mere-non-examination-of-family-member-who-intends-to-do-business-in-the-rented-premises\/","title":{"rendered":"Landlord cannot be non-suited due to mere non-examination of family member who intends to do business in the rented premises"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court<\/strong>: Deciding a short question of law as to whether the requirement of the landlord for own occupation could also mean occupation by a member of the family, the bench of Kurian Joseph and A.M. Khanwilkar, JJ said that mere non-examination of the family member who intends to do the business cannot be taken as a ground for repelling the reasonable requirement of the landlord.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">According to the J&amp;K High Court, the appellant has failed to establish her reasonable requirement for own occupation as per Section 11(1)(h) of the Jammu and Kashmir Houses and Shop Rent Control Act, 1966. Having not examined the son who intends to do the business, the requirement of own occupation was not established.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the present case, the landlord was not happy and content with the paltry rent received from the premises and intended to engage her unemployed and uneducated son in the business at the premises. Considering the facts of the case, the Court said that the eviction is not sought on the last limb of Section 11(1)(h) of the Act namely, \u201cfor the occupation of any person for whose benefit the house or shop is held\u201d. The premises sought to be evicted is not held for the benefit of the son alone; but the whole family. It is for the own occupation of the landlord and it is for the landlord to decide as to the best use the premises should be put to.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court said that the reasonable requirement by the landlord of the premises would depend on whether the landlord has been able to establish a genuine element of need for the premises which would depend on the facts and circumstances of each case. Merely because the landlord has not examined the member of the family who intends to do business in the premises, he cannot be non-suited in case he has otherwise established a genuine need. [Mehmooda Gulshan v. Javaid Hussain Mungloo,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/p5L3HG2H\">2017 SCC OnLine SC 143<\/a>, decided on 17.02.2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: Deciding a short question of law as to whether the requirement of the landlord for own occupation could also mean <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[4531,14191,8251],"class_list":["post-107521","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-eviction","tag-genuine-need","tag-landlord"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Landlord cannot be non-suited due to mere non-examination of family member who intends to do business in the rented premises | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/17\/landlord-cannot-be-non-suited-due-to-mere-non-examination-of-family-member-who-intends-to-do-business-in-the-rented-premises\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Landlord cannot be non-suited due to mere non-examination of family member who intends to do business in the rented premises\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: Deciding a short question of law as to whether the requirement of the landlord for own occupation could also mean\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/17\/landlord-cannot-be-non-suited-due-to-mere-non-examination-of-family-member-who-intends-to-do-business-in-the-rented-premises\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-02-17T14:26:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-02T11:41:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/17\/landlord-cannot-be-non-suited-due-to-mere-non-examination-of-family-member-who-intends-to-do-business-in-the-rented-premises\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/17\/landlord-cannot-be-non-suited-due-to-mere-non-examination-of-family-member-who-intends-to-do-business-in-the-rented-premises\/\",\"name\":\"Landlord cannot be non-suited due to mere non-examination of family member who intends to do business in the rented premises | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/17\/landlord-cannot-be-non-suited-due-to-mere-non-examination-of-family-member-who-intends-to-do-business-in-the-rented-premises\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/17\/landlord-cannot-be-non-suited-due-to-mere-non-examination-of-family-member-who-intends-to-do-business-in-the-rented-premises\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-02-17T14:26:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-02T11:41:26+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/17\/landlord-cannot-be-non-suited-due-to-mere-non-examination-of-family-member-who-intends-to-do-business-in-the-rented-premises\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/17\/landlord-cannot-be-non-suited-due-to-mere-non-examination-of-family-member-who-intends-to-do-business-in-the-rented-premises\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/17\/landlord-cannot-be-non-suited-due-to-mere-non-examination-of-family-member-who-intends-to-do-business-in-the-rented-premises\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/17\/landlord-cannot-be-non-suited-due-to-mere-non-examination-of-family-member-who-intends-to-do-business-in-the-rented-premises\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Landlord cannot be non-suited due to mere non-examination of family member who intends to do business in the rented premises\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Landlord cannot be non-suited due to mere non-examination of family member who intends to do business in the rented premises | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/17\/landlord-cannot-be-non-suited-due-to-mere-non-examination-of-family-member-who-intends-to-do-business-in-the-rented-premises\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Landlord cannot be non-suited due to mere non-examination of family member who intends to do business in the rented premises","og_description":"Supreme Court: Deciding a short question of law as to whether the requirement of the landlord for own occupation could also mean","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/17\/landlord-cannot-be-non-suited-due-to-mere-non-examination-of-family-member-who-intends-to-do-business-in-the-rented-premises\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-02-17T14:26:09+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-02T11:41:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/17\/landlord-cannot-be-non-suited-due-to-mere-non-examination-of-family-member-who-intends-to-do-business-in-the-rented-premises\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/17\/landlord-cannot-be-non-suited-due-to-mere-non-examination-of-family-member-who-intends-to-do-business-in-the-rented-premises\/","name":"Landlord cannot be non-suited due to mere non-examination of family member who intends to do business in the rented premises | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/17\/landlord-cannot-be-non-suited-due-to-mere-non-examination-of-family-member-who-intends-to-do-business-in-the-rented-premises\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/17\/landlord-cannot-be-non-suited-due-to-mere-non-examination-of-family-member-who-intends-to-do-business-in-the-rented-premises\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2017-02-17T14:26:09+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-02T11:41:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/17\/landlord-cannot-be-non-suited-due-to-mere-non-examination-of-family-member-who-intends-to-do-business-in-the-rented-premises\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/17\/landlord-cannot-be-non-suited-due-to-mere-non-examination-of-family-member-who-intends-to-do-business-in-the-rented-premises\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/17\/landlord-cannot-be-non-suited-due-to-mere-non-examination-of-family-member-who-intends-to-do-business-in-the-rented-premises\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/17\/landlord-cannot-be-non-suited-due-to-mere-non-examination-of-family-member-who-intends-to-do-business-in-the-rented-premises\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Landlord cannot be non-suited due to mere non-examination of family member who intends to do business in the rented premises"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":215827,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/18\/sikkim-hc-personal-occupation-of-landlord-includes-requirement-of-dependents-eviction-decree-confirmed-in-absence-of-special-equities-in-favour-of-tenant\/","url_meta":{"origin":107521,"position":0},"title":"Sikkim HC | &#8220;Personal occupation&#8221; of landlord includes requirement of dependents; eviction decree confirmed in absence of special equities in favour of tenant","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Sikkim High Court:\u00a0Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J. confirmed a decree of eviction passed against the appellant-tenant by the District Judge on the bonafide requirement of the landlord. The sole ground for eviction being contended in the application was the requirement of suit premises for the personal occupation of the landlord. Under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":253798,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/07\/landlord\/","url_meta":{"origin":107521,"position":1},"title":"What are the essential ingredients that a landlord is required to show for purpose of getting an eviction order for bonafide needs? Del HC elaborates","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Jayant Nath, J., while addressing a matter noted the essential ingredients that a landlord is required to show for the purpose of getting an eviction order for bonafide needs. Respondents counsel in the present application vehemently relied upon various orders passed by this Court to hold that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":363635,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/13\/landlord-not-required-to-show-exact-use-in-eviction-petition-del-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":107521,"position":2},"title":"Landlord not required to disclose exact nature of use of premise in eviction petition: Delhi HC","author":"Editor","date":"October 13, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 is silent about any requirement of the landlord giving the details\/ divulging anything qua the nature\/ purpose\/ disclosure of the proposed new business by the landlord.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"landlord not required to disclose exact use","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/landlord-not-required-to-disclose-exact-use.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/landlord-not-required-to-disclose-exact-use.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/landlord-not-required-to-disclose-exact-use.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/landlord-not-required-to-disclose-exact-use.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":363765,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/14\/purchase-of-other-properties-is-no-impediment-for-eviction-proceeding-by-landlord-del-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":107521,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court: Sale, purchase or lease of other properties by landlord not an impediment to file eviction proceedings","author":"Editor","date":"October 14, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWith respect to the bona fide requirement of the landlord, the landlord was only to make out a legitimate case setting out the plausible reason which are not fanciful and unreasonable to establish a bona fide requirement of the subject premises.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"eviction proceeding by landlord","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/eviction-proceeding-by-landlord.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/eviction-proceeding-by-landlord.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/eviction-proceeding-by-landlord.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/eviction-proceeding-by-landlord.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217152,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/22\/hp-hc-requirement-by-landlords-family-member-is-considered-a-requirement-by-landlord-for-his-own-use-eviction-upheld\/","url_meta":{"origin":107521,"position":4},"title":"HP HC | Requirement by landlord\u2019s family member is considered a requirement by landlord for \u2018his own use\u2019; eviction upheld","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 22, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: The instant petition involved a question that whether the eviction of tenant could be ordered for settling married son of the landlord under Section 14(3)(a)(i) of H.P. Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, even the same was not covered by Section 14(3)(d) of the Act. The same\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":376642,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/24\/bom-hc-demolition-doesnt-eclipse-landlords-requirement\/","url_meta":{"origin":107521,"position":5},"title":"Tenancy continues despite demolition, but eviction justified on landlord&#8217;s bona fide requirement &#038; tenant&#8217;s prolonged non-user: Bombay HC","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"February 24, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is clear that the landlord has established the requirement as pleaded and subsequent developments are not such as to completely eclipse or extinguish the bona fide requirement.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"effect of building demolition on Tenancy","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/effect-of-building-demolition-on-Tenancy.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/effect-of-building-demolition-on-Tenancy.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/effect-of-building-demolition-on-Tenancy.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/effect-of-building-demolition-on-Tenancy.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107521","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=107521"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107521\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=107521"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=107521"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=107521"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}