{"id":105561,"date":"2017-02-13T11:29:51","date_gmt":"2017-02-13T05:59:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=105561"},"modified":"2017-02-13T11:29:51","modified_gmt":"2017-02-13T05:59:51","slug":"court-of-appeals-at-san-francisco-denies-trumps-emergency-motion-against-temporary-nationwide-stay-on-travel-ban","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/13\/court-of-appeals-at-san-francisco-denies-trumps-emergency-motion-against-temporary-nationwide-stay-on-travel-ban\/","title":{"rendered":"Court of Appeals at San Francisco denies Trump\u2019s emergency motion against temporary nationwide stay on Travel Ban"},"content":{"rendered":"

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit:\u00a0<\/strong>After imposition of a nation-wide TRO against the travel ban executive order by President Trump, the Ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals also ruled that the TRO must stay in place and refused to reinstate the order banning travellers from seven countries. It was claimed by the appellants that any order by President was unreviewable by the Court. To this, the court observed that though such an order has not been reviewed earlier, but at the same time, there was no such precedent holding that the Court could not review it, especially when the order ran contrary to the fundamental structure of constitutional democracy. The Court also averred that although the courts must defer to interfere in president\u2019s policy, but the federal judiciary retained the authority to adjudicate constitutional challenges to executive action.<\/p>\n

The aim of the Court was only to rule whether the travel ban should be re-instated or not and did not rule on the claims of petitioner States that the order was in effect a Muslim-ban, based on religious discrimination. However, the Bench held that the evidence of President making statements calling the ban a Muslim Ban could be taken into account in future proceedings. The States had contended that the teaching and research missions of their Universities were being harmed because of the impugned order as the students and faculty would not be able to travel for research, academic collaboration and even, their families would not be able to visit the country. Based on the contention, citing the \u2018third party standing\u2019 doctrine, the Court held that such injuries to the State Universities gave the States standing to assert the rights of the students, scholars and the faculty to be adversely affected by the impugned order.<\/p>\n

The Court took into account the shifting interpretations being given on the Executive Order subsequent to its execution. For instance, the court quoted that days after the executive order was issued, White House counsel Donald F. McGahn II issued \u201cauthoritative guidance\u201d stating that Sections 3(c) and 3(e) of the Executive Order do not apply to lawful permanent residents. The three-Judge Bench unanimously said that\u00a0at such a point, it was difficult to rely on what was said by the counsel as they observed that government had offered no authority to establish that the White House counsel is empowered to issue an amended order superseding the order signed by the President and finally rejected the emergency motion. [State of Washington; State of Minnesota v. Donald J. Trump, President of USA, Case No. 17-35105, order dated 09-02-2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit:\u00a0After imposition of a nation-wide TRO against the travel ban executive order by President <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":104061,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-105561","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts"],"yoast_head":"\nCourt of Appeals at San Francisco denies Trump\u2019s emergency motion against temporary nationwide stay on Travel Ban | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/13\/court-of-appeals-at-san-francisco-denies-trumps-emergency-motion-against-temporary-nationwide-stay-on-travel-ban\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Court of Appeals at San Francisco denies Trump\u2019s emergency motion against temporary nationwide stay on Travel Ban\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit:\u00a0After imposition of a nation-wide TRO against the travel ban executive order by President\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/13\/court-of-appeals-at-san-francisco-denies-trumps-emergency-motion-against-temporary-nationwide-stay-on-travel-ban\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-02-13T05:59:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/13\/court-of-appeals-at-san-francisco-denies-trumps-emergency-motion-against-temporary-nationwide-stay-on-travel-ban\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/13\/court-of-appeals-at-san-francisco-denies-trumps-emergency-motion-against-temporary-nationwide-stay-on-travel-ban\/\",\"name\":\"Court of Appeals at San Francisco denies Trump\u2019s emergency motion against temporary nationwide stay on Travel Ban | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/13\/court-of-appeals-at-san-francisco-denies-trumps-emergency-motion-against-temporary-nationwide-stay-on-travel-ban\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/13\/court-of-appeals-at-san-francisco-denies-trumps-emergency-motion-against-temporary-nationwide-stay-on-travel-ban\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-02-13T05:59:51+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/13\/court-of-appeals-at-san-francisco-denies-trumps-emergency-motion-against-temporary-nationwide-stay-on-travel-ban\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/13\/court-of-appeals-at-san-francisco-denies-trumps-emergency-motion-against-temporary-nationwide-stay-on-travel-ban\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/13\/court-of-appeals-at-san-francisco-denies-trumps-emergency-motion-against-temporary-nationwide-stay-on-travel-ban\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/13\/court-of-appeals-at-san-francisco-denies-trumps-emergency-motion-against-temporary-nationwide-stay-on-travel-ban\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Court of Appeals at San Francisco denies Trump\u2019s emergency motion against temporary nationwide stay on Travel Ban\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Court of Appeals at San Francisco denies Trump\u2019s emergency motion against temporary nationwide stay on Travel Ban | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/13\/court-of-appeals-at-san-francisco-denies-trumps-emergency-motion-against-temporary-nationwide-stay-on-travel-ban\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Court of Appeals at San Francisco denies Trump\u2019s emergency motion against temporary nationwide stay on Travel Ban","og_description":"United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit:\u00a0After imposition of a nation-wide TRO against the travel ban executive order by President","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/13\/court-of-appeals-at-san-francisco-denies-trumps-emergency-motion-against-temporary-nationwide-stay-on-travel-ban\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-02-13T05:59:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/13\/court-of-appeals-at-san-francisco-denies-trumps-emergency-motion-against-temporary-nationwide-stay-on-travel-ban\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/13\/court-of-appeals-at-san-francisco-denies-trumps-emergency-motion-against-temporary-nationwide-stay-on-travel-ban\/","name":"Court of Appeals at San Francisco denies Trump\u2019s emergency motion against temporary nationwide stay on Travel Ban | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/13\/court-of-appeals-at-san-francisco-denies-trumps-emergency-motion-against-temporary-nationwide-stay-on-travel-ban\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/13\/court-of-appeals-at-san-francisco-denies-trumps-emergency-motion-against-temporary-nationwide-stay-on-travel-ban\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg","datePublished":"2017-02-13T05:59:51+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/13\/court-of-appeals-at-san-francisco-denies-trumps-emergency-motion-against-temporary-nationwide-stay-on-travel-ban\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/13\/court-of-appeals-at-san-francisco-denies-trumps-emergency-motion-against-temporary-nationwide-stay-on-travel-ban\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/13\/court-of-appeals-at-san-francisco-denies-trumps-emergency-motion-against-temporary-nationwide-stay-on-travel-ban\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/13\/court-of-appeals-at-san-francisco-denies-trumps-emergency-motion-against-temporary-nationwide-stay-on-travel-ban\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Court of Appeals at San Francisco denies Trump\u2019s emergency motion against temporary nationwide stay on Travel Ban"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":104641,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/appeals-court-denies-setting-aside-district-court-order-of-temporarily-restraining-the-travel-ban-order\/","url_meta":{"origin":105561,"position":0},"title":"Appeals Court denies setting aside District Court order of temporarily restraining the travel ban order","author":"Saba","date":"February 8, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit:\u00a0After the Temporary Restraint Order by the District Court,\u00a0Western District of Washington at Seattle \u00a0against the travel ban in USA on 03-02-2017, the government appealed against the order in San Francisco Appeals Court, moving an\u00a0Emergency Motion under Circuit Rule 27-3 for administrative\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":173534,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/05\/travel-ban-allowed-enforced-completely\/","url_meta":{"origin":105561,"position":1},"title":"Travel ban allowed to be enforced completely","author":"Saba","date":"December 5, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"As reported by The Guardian, the Supreme Court of the United States has, by a 7:2 majority, allowed the Trump administration's travel ban to take into full effect. The Court ruled on Monday that a ban ordered on travellers from six Muslim-majority countries and two other countries could be immediately\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216740,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/11\/breaking-blocking-of-people-on-twitter-by-potus-ruled-unconstitutional-by-appeals-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":105561,"position":2},"title":"Breaking | Blocking of people on twitter by POTUS ruled unconstitutional by Appeals Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 11, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"As reported by media, Violation of Free Speech Law | Donald Trump, the U.S. President cannot block critics from his twitter account as the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan stated the following: \"The First Amendment does not permit a public official who utilises a social media account\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/twitter.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/twitter.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/twitter.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/twitter.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/twitter.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":52411,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/21\/use-of-prior-tribal-court-convictions-consistent-with-the-indian-civil-rights-act-as-predicate-offenses-for-federal-offenses-does-not-violate-the-constitution\/","url_meta":{"origin":105561,"position":3},"title":"Use of prior tribal-court convictions consistent with the Indian Civil Rights Act as predicate offenses for federal offenses does not violate the Constitution","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 21, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of United States: The Court in a unanimous decision allowed the State's writ of Certiorari and reversed and remanded the decision of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, effectively overturning the acquittal of the Respondent of the felony offense of domestic assault in Indian Country\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court of The United States","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238585,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/05\/scotus-gives-a-sharp-critique-to-the-fifth-circuit-court-for-venturing-into-an-uncertain-area-of-tort-law-especially-when-it-has-implications-for-first-amendment-rights-without-seek\/","url_meta":{"origin":105561,"position":4},"title":"SCOTUS gives a sharp critique to the Fifth Circuit Court for venturing into an \u201cuncertain area of Tort law, especially when it has implications for First Amendment Rights\u201d without seeking guidance from the Louisiana Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"November 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of The United States (SCOTUS): While deciding the instant petition for granting the writ of certiorari, wherein a question of constitutional importance vis-\u00e0-vis the theory of personal liability for violence during an activity protected by the First Amendment as adopted by the Court of Appeals for the Fifth\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court of The United States","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":323776,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/06\/scotus-decides-which-prevails-when-two-executed-contracts-provide-different-dispute-resolution-methods\/","url_meta":{"origin":105561,"position":5},"title":"Courts must decide which contract will prevail when parties execute two contracts providing different dispute resolution mechanisms: SCOTUS","author":"Editor","date":"June 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The instant dispute involved a conflict between two contracts executed by petitioner Coinbase, Inc., operator of a cryptocurrency exchange platform, and the respondents, who used Coinbase.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"two contracts different modes of dispute resolution","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/two-contracts-different-modes-of-dispute-resolution.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/two-contracts-different-modes-of-dispute-resolution.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/two-contracts-different-modes-of-dispute-resolution.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/two-contracts-different-modes-of-dispute-resolution.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/105561","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=105561"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/105561\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/104061"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=105561"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=105561"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=105561"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}