{"id":104871,"date":"2017-02-09T10:28:29","date_gmt":"2017-02-09T04:58:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=104871"},"modified":"2017-02-24T12:37:22","modified_gmt":"2017-02-24T07:07:22","slug":"an-employers-right-to-recover-excess-payment-from-pensionary-benefits-of-employee-who-has-committed-no-fraud-or-misrepresentation-whatsoever-must-be-strictly-construed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/09\/an-employers-right-to-recover-excess-payment-from-pensionary-benefits-of-employee-who-has-committed-no-fraud-or-misrepresentation-whatsoever-must-be-strictly-construed\/","title":{"rendered":"An employer\u2019s right to recover excess payment from pensionary benefits of employee who has committed no fraud or misrepresentation whatsoever, must be strictly construed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Calcutta High Court:<\/strong> In the present case, where the petitioner was aggrieved due to the impugned Pension Payment Order, 1999 by which the respondent authorities had deducted an amount of Rs. 29,447 on account of alleged overdrawal, the Bench of Arijit Banerjee, J., held that pensionary benefits are paid to a superannuated person by way of social welfare measure to enable him to live a life of dignity which is now recognized as a fundamental right of a citizen of India. An employer\u2019s right to recover excess payment from the pensionary benefits of an employee who has committed no fraud or misrepresentation whatsoever, must be strictly construed. However, if fraud has been committed by an employee to induce the employer to make the excess payment, then such an employer\u2019s right to recovery from pensionary benefits cannot be doubted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the instant case, the counsel for the petitioner Sourav Mitra contended that recovery of excess payment cannot be made from the retiral benefits of an employee unless such excess payment was made to the concerned employee because of some misrepresentation or fraud on his part. Meanwhile, the State via Supriyo Chattopadhyay, contended that excess payments made due to irregular pay fixation can be recovered by the employer.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Upon perusing the rival contentions and noting the declaration signed by the petitioner for his employer as to recovery excess payment, the Court observed that the form of declaration clearly means that even at the highest, recovery of excess payment could be made by the State from the salary bill of the petitioner during the tenure of his service and such a declaration would not entitle the State to recover any overdrawals from the pensionary benefits of the petitioner. The Court also went on to observe that declarations as to recovery excess payments are signed by employees under compelling circumstances with no real choice in such issues. [Shiba Rani Maity v. State of West Bengal, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/7E2C7YW6\">2017 SCC OnLine Cal 109<\/a>, decided on 18.01.2017]<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Calcutta High Court: In the present case, where the petitioner was aggrieved due to the impugned Pension Payment Order, 1999 by which <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":52131,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[13931,12441],"class_list":["post-104871","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-excess-payments","tag-pensionary-benefits"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>An employer\u2019s right to recover excess payment from pensionary benefits of employee who has committed no fraud or misrepresentation whatsoever, must be strictly construed | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/09\/an-employers-right-to-recover-excess-payment-from-pensionary-benefits-of-employee-who-has-committed-no-fraud-or-misrepresentation-whatsoever-must-be-strictly-construed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"An employer\u2019s right to recover excess payment from pensionary benefits of employee who has committed no fraud or misrepresentation whatsoever, must be strictly construed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court: In the present case, where the petitioner was aggrieved due to the impugned Pension Payment Order, 1999 by which\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/09\/an-employers-right-to-recover-excess-payment-from-pensionary-benefits-of-employee-who-has-committed-no-fraud-or-misrepresentation-whatsoever-must-be-strictly-construed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-02-09T04:58:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-24T07:07:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/09\/an-employers-right-to-recover-excess-payment-from-pensionary-benefits-of-employee-who-has-committed-no-fraud-or-misrepresentation-whatsoever-must-be-strictly-construed\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/09\/an-employers-right-to-recover-excess-payment-from-pensionary-benefits-of-employee-who-has-committed-no-fraud-or-misrepresentation-whatsoever-must-be-strictly-construed\/\",\"name\":\"An employer\u2019s right to recover excess payment from pensionary benefits of employee who has committed no fraud or misrepresentation whatsoever, must be strictly construed | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/09\/an-employers-right-to-recover-excess-payment-from-pensionary-benefits-of-employee-who-has-committed-no-fraud-or-misrepresentation-whatsoever-must-be-strictly-construed\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/09\/an-employers-right-to-recover-excess-payment-from-pensionary-benefits-of-employee-who-has-committed-no-fraud-or-misrepresentation-whatsoever-must-be-strictly-construed\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-02-09T04:58:29+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-24T07:07:22+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/09\/an-employers-right-to-recover-excess-payment-from-pensionary-benefits-of-employee-who-has-committed-no-fraud-or-misrepresentation-whatsoever-must-be-strictly-construed\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/09\/an-employers-right-to-recover-excess-payment-from-pensionary-benefits-of-employee-who-has-committed-no-fraud-or-misrepresentation-whatsoever-must-be-strictly-construed\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/09\/an-employers-right-to-recover-excess-payment-from-pensionary-benefits-of-employee-who-has-committed-no-fraud-or-misrepresentation-whatsoever-must-be-strictly-construed\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/09\/an-employers-right-to-recover-excess-payment-from-pensionary-benefits-of-employee-who-has-committed-no-fraud-or-misrepresentation-whatsoever-must-be-strictly-construed\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"An employer\u2019s right to recover excess payment from pensionary benefits of employee who has committed no fraud or misrepresentation whatsoever, must be strictly construed\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"An employer\u2019s right to recover excess payment from pensionary benefits of employee who has committed no fraud or misrepresentation whatsoever, must be strictly construed | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/09\/an-employers-right-to-recover-excess-payment-from-pensionary-benefits-of-employee-who-has-committed-no-fraud-or-misrepresentation-whatsoever-must-be-strictly-construed\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"An employer\u2019s right to recover excess payment from pensionary benefits of employee who has committed no fraud or misrepresentation whatsoever, must be strictly construed","og_description":"Calcutta High Court: In the present case, where the petitioner was aggrieved due to the impugned Pension Payment Order, 1999 by which","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/09\/an-employers-right-to-recover-excess-payment-from-pensionary-benefits-of-employee-who-has-committed-no-fraud-or-misrepresentation-whatsoever-must-be-strictly-construed\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-02-09T04:58:29+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-24T07:07:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/09\/an-employers-right-to-recover-excess-payment-from-pensionary-benefits-of-employee-who-has-committed-no-fraud-or-misrepresentation-whatsoever-must-be-strictly-construed\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/09\/an-employers-right-to-recover-excess-payment-from-pensionary-benefits-of-employee-who-has-committed-no-fraud-or-misrepresentation-whatsoever-must-be-strictly-construed\/","name":"An employer\u2019s right to recover excess payment from pensionary benefits of employee who has committed no fraud or misrepresentation whatsoever, must be strictly construed | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/09\/an-employers-right-to-recover-excess-payment-from-pensionary-benefits-of-employee-who-has-committed-no-fraud-or-misrepresentation-whatsoever-must-be-strictly-construed\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/09\/an-employers-right-to-recover-excess-payment-from-pensionary-benefits-of-employee-who-has-committed-no-fraud-or-misrepresentation-whatsoever-must-be-strictly-construed\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","datePublished":"2017-02-09T04:58:29+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-24T07:07:22+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/09\/an-employers-right-to-recover-excess-payment-from-pensionary-benefits-of-employee-who-has-committed-no-fraud-or-misrepresentation-whatsoever-must-be-strictly-construed\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/09\/an-employers-right-to-recover-excess-payment-from-pensionary-benefits-of-employee-who-has-committed-no-fraud-or-misrepresentation-whatsoever-must-be-strictly-construed\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/09\/an-employers-right-to-recover-excess-payment-from-pensionary-benefits-of-employee-who-has-committed-no-fraud-or-misrepresentation-whatsoever-must-be-strictly-construed\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/09\/an-employers-right-to-recover-excess-payment-from-pensionary-benefits-of-employee-who-has-committed-no-fraud-or-misrepresentation-whatsoever-must-be-strictly-construed\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"An employer\u2019s right to recover excess payment from pensionary benefits of employee who has committed no fraud or misrepresentation whatsoever, must be strictly construed"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":147581,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/07\/excess-payment-made-to-a-retired-employee-cant-be-recovered-from-his-pensionary-benefits-unless-grounds-of-fraud-or-misrepresentation-are-involved\/","url_meta":{"origin":104871,"position":0},"title":"Excess payment made to a retired employee can\u2019t be recovered from his pensionary benefits, unless grounds of fraud or misrepresentation are involved","author":"Saba","date":"August 7, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: The writ petition was preferred by a primary school teacher, aggrieved that an amount of Rs. 68, 556 was deducted from the pension payment order by the authorities, due to alleged over-drawl. Learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner, by relying on the Supreme Court\u2019s decision of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239698,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/26\/gau-hc-in-the-event-an-excess-salary-is-paid-to-an-employee-during-his-her-service-tenure-because-of-no-fault-of-his-her-such-excess-payment-cannot-be-recovered-from-retirement-benefits-law-laid-d\/","url_meta":{"origin":104871,"position":1},"title":"Gau HC | In the event an excess salary is paid to an employee during his\/her service tenure because of no fault of his\/her, such excess payment cannot be recovered from retirement benefits; law laid down by SC reiterated","author":"Editor","date":"November 26, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court: Achintya Malla Bujor Barua J., while reiterating the principle laid down by Supreme Court, with respect to calculation and payment of the retirement benefits, issued necessary directions to the respondent authorities. Background The petitioner working as an Assistant Teacher in Lower Muolhoi School in the district Dima\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":267163,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/20\/employee-increment-recover-after-retirement-supreme-court-service-law-judgment-legal-updates-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":104871,"position":2},"title":"Can employer recover excess increment granted on account of error after 10 years of retirement of the employee? Supreme Court decides","author":"Editor","date":"May 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Reversing the concurrent findings of the Single Judge and Division Bench of Kerala High Court, the Bench of S. Abdul Nazeer* and Vikram Nath, JJ., held that the State cannot recover excess amount paid to the ex-employee after the delay of 10 years. The Court held that if\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-179.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-179.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-179.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-179.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-179.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":94931,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/27\/brother-of-government-servant-if-above-the-age-of-18-years-at-the-time-of-nomination-cannot-be-construed-as-family-member-eligible-for-pensionary-benefits\/","url_meta":{"origin":104871,"position":3},"title":"Brother of government servant, if aged 18 years and above at the time of nomination, cannot be construed as &#8216;family member&#8217; eligible for pensionary benefits","author":"Saba","date":"December 27, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: Dismissing a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution \u00a0against the order of the District judge denying pensionary benefits to the petitioner, the Bench of M. Sathyanarayanan and Nisha Banu, JJ. held that as per sub-rule 5 of Rule 45 of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":246079,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/25\/pensionary-benefits\/","url_meta":{"origin":104871,"position":4},"title":"AFT | Failure to issue speaking order regarding condonation of 6 months deficiency for pensionary benefits; Tribunal imposes a cost of Rs 50,000 for non-compliance of its order","author":"Editor","date":"March 25, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT): The Division Bench of Justice Devi Prasad Singh (Chairperson) and Air Marshal BBP Sinha, Member (A) heard the instant application wherein the allegation was levelled against the authority concerned of non-observance of Tribunal\u2019s order. The applicant was enrolled in the Army as Sepoy on 23-01-1980. On\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Armed Forces Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":260166,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/15\/no-pensionary-benefits-to-walmi-employees-employees-of-autonomous-bodies-cant-claim-benefits-on-par-with-government-employees-as-matter-of-right-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":104871,"position":5},"title":"No Pensionary Benefits To WALMI Employees; Employees Of Autonomous Bodies Can\u2019t Claim Benefits On A Par With Government Employees As Matter Of Right: SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Finding the Bombay High Court\u2019s judgment directing the State to extend the pensionary benefits to the employees of Water and Land Management Institute (WALMI) unsustainable, both in law and on facts, the bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ held that the employees of WALMI, which is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-43.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-43.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-43.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-43.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-43.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104871","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=104871"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104871\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/52131"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=104871"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=104871"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=104871"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}