{"id":104841,"date":"2017-02-08T22:29:32","date_gmt":"2017-02-08T16:59:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=104841"},"modified":"2017-02-27T22:20:50","modified_gmt":"2017-02-27T16:50:50","slug":"married-female-tenants-sibling-is-neither-an-heir-nor-a-family-under-the-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/married-female-tenants-sibling-is-neither-an-heir-nor-a-family-under-the-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972\/","title":{"rendered":"Married female tenant&#8217;s sibling is neither an \u201cheir\u201d nor a \u201cfamily\u201d under the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court<\/strong>: The bench of Dipak Misra and R. Banumathi, JJ held that the brother of a married female tenant is neither a \u2018heir\u2019 as visualized under Section 3(a) nor \u2018family\u2019 within the meaning of Section 3(g) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the present case, the suit property was taken on rent by the father-in-law of deceased tenant and after his death, his son became tenant of the suit property. Upon his death, his wife i.e. the appellant\u2019s sister became the tenant of the suit property.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court noticed that the word \u2018heir\u2019 is not defined in the Act and hence, it has to be given the same meaning as would be applicable to the general law of succession. Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act lays down the general order of succession to the property of a female intestate who dies after the commencement of the Hindu Succession Act and the exception carved out in Section 15(2)(b) provides for a special order of succession in case of property inherited by her from her husband or her father-in-law; but its operation is confined to the case of her dying without leaving a son or a daughter or children of pre-deceased children to inherit her property. Language used in the section clearly specifies that the property inherited from the husband and father-in-law would devolve upon the heirs of husband\/father-in-law from whom she inherited the property. Hence, upon death of the deceased tenant, in terms of Section 15(2)(b) of the Hindu Succession Act, in the absence of any son or daughter, the tenancy would devolve upon the heirs of her husband.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Determining whether the appellant was \u201cfamily\u201d as per Section 3(g) of the Act, the Court said that the said section defines \u2018family\u2019, in relation to landlord which includes the spouse that is husband or wife of a person, male lineal descendants which means his or her son, son\u2019s son, son\u2019s son\u2019s son and so on, parents, grandparents, unmarried, widowed, divorced daughter or granddaughter, etc. The definition given in the clause is an inclusive one and is supposed to be construed in its technical meaning which implies what is not given has to be excluded as not forming part of the family of landlord or tenant. Therefore, sisters and brothers of landlord and tenant are excluded from his\/her family. \u00a0[Durga Prasad v. Narayan Ramchandaani,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/58RxeB32\"> 2017 SCC OnLine SC 103<\/a>, decided on 07.02.2017]<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: The bench of Dipak Misra and R. Banumathi, JJ held that the brother of a married female tenant is neither <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[5251,4121,2526,13921,13911],"class_list":["post-104841","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-family","tag-heir","tag-Interpretation","tag-married-woman","tag-tenancy-and-land-laws"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Married female tenant&#039;s sibling is neither an \u201cheir\u201d nor a \u201cfamily\u201d under the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/married-female-tenants-sibling-is-neither-an-heir-nor-a-family-under-the-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Married female tenant&#039;s sibling is neither an \u201cheir\u201d nor a \u201cfamily\u201d under the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: The bench of Dipak Misra and R. Banumathi, JJ held that the brother of a married female tenant is neither\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/married-female-tenants-sibling-is-neither-an-heir-nor-a-family-under-the-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-02-08T16:59:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-27T16:50:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/married-female-tenants-sibling-is-neither-an-heir-nor-a-family-under-the-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/married-female-tenants-sibling-is-neither-an-heir-nor-a-family-under-the-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972\/\",\"name\":\"Married female tenant's sibling is neither an \u201cheir\u201d nor a \u201cfamily\u201d under the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/married-female-tenants-sibling-is-neither-an-heir-nor-a-family-under-the-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/married-female-tenants-sibling-is-neither-an-heir-nor-a-family-under-the-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-02-08T16:59:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-27T16:50:50+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/married-female-tenants-sibling-is-neither-an-heir-nor-a-family-under-the-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/married-female-tenants-sibling-is-neither-an-heir-nor-a-family-under-the-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/married-female-tenants-sibling-is-neither-an-heir-nor-a-family-under-the-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/married-female-tenants-sibling-is-neither-an-heir-nor-a-family-under-the-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Married female tenant&#8217;s sibling is neither an \u201cheir\u201d nor a \u201cfamily\u201d under the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Married female tenant's sibling is neither an \u201cheir\u201d nor a \u201cfamily\u201d under the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/married-female-tenants-sibling-is-neither-an-heir-nor-a-family-under-the-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Married female tenant's sibling is neither an \u201cheir\u201d nor a \u201cfamily\u201d under the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972","og_description":"Supreme Court: The bench of Dipak Misra and R. Banumathi, JJ held that the brother of a married female tenant is neither","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/married-female-tenants-sibling-is-neither-an-heir-nor-a-family-under-the-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-02-08T16:59:32+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-27T16:50:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/married-female-tenants-sibling-is-neither-an-heir-nor-a-family-under-the-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/married-female-tenants-sibling-is-neither-an-heir-nor-a-family-under-the-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972\/","name":"Married female tenant's sibling is neither an \u201cheir\u201d nor a \u201cfamily\u201d under the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/married-female-tenants-sibling-is-neither-an-heir-nor-a-family-under-the-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/married-female-tenants-sibling-is-neither-an-heir-nor-a-family-under-the-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2017-02-08T16:59:32+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-27T16:50:50+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/married-female-tenants-sibling-is-neither-an-heir-nor-a-family-under-the-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/married-female-tenants-sibling-is-neither-an-heir-nor-a-family-under-the-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/married-female-tenants-sibling-is-neither-an-heir-nor-a-family-under-the-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/married-female-tenants-sibling-is-neither-an-heir-nor-a-family-under-the-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Married female tenant&#8217;s sibling is neither an \u201cheir\u201d nor a \u201cfamily\u201d under the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":74071,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/28\/any-female-having-a-legal-right-of-residence-in-the-building-is-entitled-to-seek-eviction-of-the-tenant-for-her-need\/","url_meta":{"origin":104841,"position":0},"title":"Any female having a legal right of residence in the building is entitled to seek eviction of the tenant for her need","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 28, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a matter relating to eviction of the tenant, the bench of J. Chelameswar and Abhay Manohar Sapre, JJ held that any female, if she is having a legal right of residence in the building, is entitled to seek eviction of the tenant from such building for her\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6340,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/05\/30\/validity-of-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972-upheld\/","url_meta":{"origin":104841,"position":1},"title":"Validity of U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 upheld","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 30, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: While deciding a case relating to eviction of tenants who lived in the property of Petitioners which was regulated by the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, the division bench of Sunil Ambwani and Mohd. Tahir JJ. discussed on the issue of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":361167,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/22\/hp-hc-sub-tenant-bound-by-eviction-order-against-tenant\/","url_meta":{"origin":104841,"position":2},"title":"Eviction order against tenant binds sub-tenant if he fails to establish his tenancy directly under landlord\u2019s predecessor-in-interest: Himachal Pradesh HC","author":"Editor","date":"September 22, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe sub-tenant was not a necessary party to an eviction petition on the ground of sub-letting, but since in the instant case the landlord herself had impleaded sub-tenant as a party, it could not be said that the sub-tenant was not the aggrieved party.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sub-tenant bound by eviction order against tenant","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Sub-tenant-bound-by-eviction-order-against-tenant.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Sub-tenant-bound-by-eviction-order-against-tenant.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Sub-tenant-bound-by-eviction-order-against-tenant.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Sub-tenant-bound-by-eviction-order-against-tenant.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245438,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/12\/legal-heirs\/","url_meta":{"origin":104841,"position":3},"title":"All HC | During his lifetime, tenant enters into compromise with landlord and enjoys benefits thereof. After such tenant&#8217;s demise, can his legal heirs challenge the compromise? HC uncovers legal position","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 12, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Vivek Kumar Birla, J., expressed: \u201c\u2026a party cannot be permitted to blow hot \u2013 blow cold, where he knowingly accepts the benefit of a contract, or conveyance, or of an order, he is estopped from denying the validity of, or the binding effect of such contract, or\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":196684,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/05\/tenant-ordered-to-be-evicted-in-light-of-bona-fide-need-of-the-landlord\/","url_meta":{"origin":104841,"position":4},"title":"Tenant ordered to be evicted in light of bona fide need of the landlord","author":"Saba","date":"June 5, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A revision petition filed against the order of Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority evicting the petitioner-tenant from the property concerned, was dismissed by a Single Judge Bench comprising of Surinder Gupta, J. The respondent-landlord filed a petition under Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":308659,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/07\/no-bar-which-restrict-landlord-from-beneficial-enjoyment-of-his-property-allahabad-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":104841,"position":5},"title":"No bar which can restrict landlord from beneficial enjoyment of his property: Allahabad HC upholds order directing tenant to vacate premises","author":"Apoorva","date":"December 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA tenant or the Court cannot direct the landlord how and in what manner he should live\/ arrange affairs. There is no bar which can restrict a landlord from beneficial enjoyment of his own property\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104841","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=104841"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104841\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=104841"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=104841"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=104841"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}