{"id":104641,"date":"2017-02-08T12:45:32","date_gmt":"2017-02-08T07:15:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=104641"},"modified":"2017-02-21T12:42:46","modified_gmt":"2017-02-21T07:12:46","slug":"appeals-court-denies-setting-aside-district-court-order-of-temporarily-restraining-the-travel-ban-order","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/appeals-court-denies-setting-aside-district-court-order-of-temporarily-restraining-the-travel-ban-order\/","title":{"rendered":"Appeals Court denies setting aside District Court order of temporarily restraining the travel ban order"},"content":{"rendered":"

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit<\/strong>:\u00a0After the Temporary Restraint Order by the District Court,\u00a0Western District of Washington at Seattle \u00a0against the travel ban in USA on 03-02-2017<\/a>, the government appealed against the order in San Francisco Appeals Court, moving an\u00a0Emergency Motion under Circuit Rule 27-3 for administrative stay and motion for stay pending appeal.\u00a0The Court denied the appeal and refrained from ordering the immediate reinstatement of the executive order.<\/p>\n

It was contended in favour of the executive order that the injunction contravened the constitutional separation of powers and harmed the public by thwarting enforcement of an Executive Order issued by the nation\u2019s elected representative responsible for immigration matters and foreign affairs. It was also highlighted that the aliens were being given the privilege by permitting an entry into USA and they possessed no constitutional right as such.<\/p>\n

However, on the other side, it was contended that the work of the judiciary is to ensure that the executive and legislature comport with the country\u2019s laws and the Constitution. Though the question before the Court was narrow, but it is the duty of the court to ensure that the impugned executive order does not prove detrimental either to the citizens\/residents in the country or even the executive branch of the tripart government.<\/p>\n

Accordingly, the Appeals Court did not set aside the order of the District Court and denied to reinstate the impugned executive order. [State of Washington, et al., v. Donald Trump, President of the United States, et al., \u00a0No. 17-35105, \u00a0order dated \u00a04.02.2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit:\u00a0After the Temporary Restraint Order by the District Court,\u00a0Western District of Washington at Seattle <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":104061,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-104641","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts"],"yoast_head":"\nAppeals Court denies setting aside District Court order of temporarily restraining the travel ban order | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/appeals-court-denies-setting-aside-district-court-order-of-temporarily-restraining-the-travel-ban-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Appeals Court denies setting aside District Court order of temporarily restraining the travel ban order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit:\u00a0After the Temporary Restraint Order by the District Court,\u00a0Western District of Washington at Seattle\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/appeals-court-denies-setting-aside-district-court-order-of-temporarily-restraining-the-travel-ban-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-02-08T07:15:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-21T07:12:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/appeals-court-denies-setting-aside-district-court-order-of-temporarily-restraining-the-travel-ban-order\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/appeals-court-denies-setting-aside-district-court-order-of-temporarily-restraining-the-travel-ban-order\/\",\"name\":\"Appeals Court denies setting aside District Court order of temporarily restraining the travel ban order | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/appeals-court-denies-setting-aside-district-court-order-of-temporarily-restraining-the-travel-ban-order\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/appeals-court-denies-setting-aside-district-court-order-of-temporarily-restraining-the-travel-ban-order\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-02-08T07:15:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-21T07:12:46+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/appeals-court-denies-setting-aside-district-court-order-of-temporarily-restraining-the-travel-ban-order\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/appeals-court-denies-setting-aside-district-court-order-of-temporarily-restraining-the-travel-ban-order\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/appeals-court-denies-setting-aside-district-court-order-of-temporarily-restraining-the-travel-ban-order\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/appeals-court-denies-setting-aside-district-court-order-of-temporarily-restraining-the-travel-ban-order\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Appeals Court denies setting aside District Court order of temporarily restraining the travel ban order\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Appeals Court denies setting aside District Court order of temporarily restraining the travel ban order | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/appeals-court-denies-setting-aside-district-court-order-of-temporarily-restraining-the-travel-ban-order\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Appeals Court denies setting aside District Court order of temporarily restraining the travel ban order","og_description":"United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit:\u00a0After the Temporary Restraint Order by the District Court,\u00a0Western District of Washington at Seattle","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/appeals-court-denies-setting-aside-district-court-order-of-temporarily-restraining-the-travel-ban-order\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-02-08T07:15:32+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-21T07:12:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/appeals-court-denies-setting-aside-district-court-order-of-temporarily-restraining-the-travel-ban-order\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/appeals-court-denies-setting-aside-district-court-order-of-temporarily-restraining-the-travel-ban-order\/","name":"Appeals Court denies setting aside District Court order of temporarily restraining the travel ban order | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/appeals-court-denies-setting-aside-district-court-order-of-temporarily-restraining-the-travel-ban-order\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/appeals-court-denies-setting-aside-district-court-order-of-temporarily-restraining-the-travel-ban-order\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg","datePublished":"2017-02-08T07:15:32+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-21T07:12:46+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/appeals-court-denies-setting-aside-district-court-order-of-temporarily-restraining-the-travel-ban-order\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/appeals-court-denies-setting-aside-district-court-order-of-temporarily-restraining-the-travel-ban-order\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/appeals-court-denies-setting-aside-district-court-order-of-temporarily-restraining-the-travel-ban-order\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/appeals-court-denies-setting-aside-district-court-order-of-temporarily-restraining-the-travel-ban-order\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Appeals Court denies setting aside District Court order of temporarily restraining the travel ban order"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":105561,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/13\/court-of-appeals-at-san-francisco-denies-trumps-emergency-motion-against-temporary-nationwide-stay-on-travel-ban\/","url_meta":{"origin":104641,"position":0},"title":"Court of Appeals at San Francisco denies Trump\u2019s emergency motion against temporary nationwide stay on Travel Ban","author":"Saba","date":"February 13, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit:\u00a0After imposition of a nation-wide TRO against the travel ban executive order by President Trump, the Ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals also ruled that the TRO must stay in place and refused to reinstate the order banning travellers from seven countries.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":289457,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/14\/section-386-crpc-confers-power-appellate-court-to-make-consequential-and-incidental-orders-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":104641,"position":1},"title":"Appellate Court can make any just consequential and incidental orders while deciding appeals u\/s 373 CrPC: Orissa High Court","author":"Editor","date":"April 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court clarified that the appellate Court's power to make just consequential and incidental order in appeals u\/s 373 CrPC includes the power to stay the operation of other proceedings.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279372,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/09\/us-court-of-appeals-bar-on-enforcement-indiana-law-burial-or-cremation-of-foetal-remains-abortion-providers-reversed-laws-legal-news-and-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":104641,"position":2},"title":"US Court of Appeals (7th Circuit) reverses bar on enforcement of Indiana law requiring abortion providers to dispose of foetal remains either by burial or cremation","author":"Editor","date":"December 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The court has reversed the US District Court order that had barred the enforcement of a law passed by Southern District of Indiana, requiring the medical providers to dispose of foetal remains via burial or cremation instead of as \u201cmedical waste\u201d stating that the law violated the First Amendment.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"United States Court of Appeals (Seventh Circuit)","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-439.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":103971,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/04\/washington-district-court-orders-nationwide-temporary-restraint-on-travel-ban\/","url_meta":{"origin":104641,"position":3},"title":"Washington District Court orders nationwide temporary restraint on travel ban","author":"Saba","date":"February 4, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Image Courtesy: Shutterstock","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":253599,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/03\/ban-on-abortions\/","url_meta":{"origin":104641,"position":4},"title":"Texas Legislation imposing a \u201cnear complete ban on abortions\u201d gets a green signal as SCOTUS declines to grant any relief on the matter","author":"Editor","date":"September 3, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of The United States: In a significant decision which can have major repercussions on a woman\u2019s choice to abort in the United States, the full bench of SCOTUS, with a ratio of 5:4, declined to block the Texas law which imposes a near complete ban on abortions. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court of The United States","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238585,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/05\/scotus-gives-a-sharp-critique-to-the-fifth-circuit-court-for-venturing-into-an-uncertain-area-of-tort-law-especially-when-it-has-implications-for-first-amendment-rights-without-seek\/","url_meta":{"origin":104641,"position":5},"title":"SCOTUS gives a sharp critique to the Fifth Circuit Court for venturing into an \u201cuncertain area of Tort law, especially when it has implications for First Amendment Rights\u201d without seeking guidance from the Louisiana Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"November 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of The United States (SCOTUS): While deciding the instant petition for granting the writ of certiorari, wherein a question of constitutional importance vis-\u00e0-vis the theory of personal liability for violence during an activity protected by the First Amendment as adopted by the Court of Appeals for the Fifth\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court of The United States","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104641","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=104641"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104641\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/104061"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=104641"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=104641"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=104641"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}