{"id":104221,"date":"2017-02-06T11:27:13","date_gmt":"2017-02-06T05:57:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=104221"},"modified":"2017-02-27T17:17:14","modified_gmt":"2017-02-27T11:47:14","slug":"fine-imposed-by-cic-on-icar-chief-public-information-officer-upheld","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/06\/fine-imposed-by-cic-on-icar-chief-public-information-officer-upheld\/","title":{"rendered":"Fine imposed by CIC on ICAR Chief Public Information Officer upheld"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>A fine of Rs. 25,000 was imposed by the Central Information Commission on Chief Public Information Officer (CPIO) of Indian Council of Agricultural Research. The applicant had applied for seeking the information under the RTI Act, 2005 about Project Directorate on Foot and Mouth Disease, its contents, costs and other related information.<\/p>\n

It was clear on the face of it that the reply given by the CPIO was quite disappointing as to most of the questions, the answer was same that is- \u2018It is an institute matter\u2019. The Court noticed that such kind of response neither answers the queries nor renders any explanation for not providing the information. Even when it was asked by the CIC as to what the abovementioned phrase meant. He responded that it meant the Project Directorate on Foot and Mouth Disease.<\/p>\n

Not even while filing the reply, but also after responding to the question by CIC, the CPIO of ICAR failed to render enough explanation for such vague response by him which could barely convey any meaning to the applicant as well as the CIC. To this, the Court upheld the decision of CIC of imposing fine on Dr. B.B. Dash, CPIO, ICAR for not providing information to the applicant without any cogent reason. [B.B. Dash v. Central Information Commission,\u00a02017 SCC OnLine Del 6691<\/a>, decided on 24.01.2017]<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0A fine of Rs. 25,000 was imposed by the Central Information Commission on Chief Public Information Officer (CPIO) of Indian <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[13801,13811,13831,13821],"class_list":["post-104221","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-chief-information-commissioner","tag-chief-public-information-officer","tag-indian-council-of-agricultural-research","tag-rti-act"],"yoast_head":"\nFine imposed by CIC on ICAR Chief Public Information Officer upheld | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/06\/fine-imposed-by-cic-on-icar-chief-public-information-officer-upheld\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Fine imposed by CIC on ICAR Chief Public Information Officer upheld\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A fine of Rs. 25,000 was imposed by the Central Information Commission on Chief Public Information Officer (CPIO) of Indian\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/06\/fine-imposed-by-cic-on-icar-chief-public-information-officer-upheld\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-02-06T05:57:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-27T11:47:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/06\/fine-imposed-by-cic-on-icar-chief-public-information-officer-upheld\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/06\/fine-imposed-by-cic-on-icar-chief-public-information-officer-upheld\/\",\"name\":\"Fine imposed by CIC on ICAR Chief Public Information Officer upheld | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-02-06T05:57:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-27T11:47:14+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/06\/fine-imposed-by-cic-on-icar-chief-public-information-officer-upheld\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/06\/fine-imposed-by-cic-on-icar-chief-public-information-officer-upheld\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/06\/fine-imposed-by-cic-on-icar-chief-public-information-officer-upheld\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Fine imposed by CIC on ICAR Chief Public Information Officer upheld\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Fine imposed by CIC on ICAR Chief Public Information Officer upheld | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/06\/fine-imposed-by-cic-on-icar-chief-public-information-officer-upheld\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Fine imposed by CIC on ICAR Chief Public Information Officer upheld","og_description":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A fine of Rs. 25,000 was imposed by the Central Information Commission on Chief Public Information Officer (CPIO) of Indian","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/06\/fine-imposed-by-cic-on-icar-chief-public-information-officer-upheld\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-02-06T05:57:13+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-27T11:47:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/06\/fine-imposed-by-cic-on-icar-chief-public-information-officer-upheld\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/06\/fine-imposed-by-cic-on-icar-chief-public-information-officer-upheld\/","name":"Fine imposed by CIC on ICAR Chief Public Information Officer upheld | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-02-06T05:57:13+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-27T11:47:14+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/06\/fine-imposed-by-cic-on-icar-chief-public-information-officer-upheld\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/06\/fine-imposed-by-cic-on-icar-chief-public-information-officer-upheld\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/06\/fine-imposed-by-cic-on-icar-chief-public-information-officer-upheld\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Fine imposed by CIC on ICAR Chief Public Information Officer upheld"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":276379,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/31\/right-to-information-rti-third-party-cpio-nios-consent-legal-updates-legal-news-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":104221,"position":0},"title":"Central Information Commission| No information of the third parties can be sought via the RTI Act without their consent","author":"Editor","date":"October 31, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Central Information Commission: In a second appeal filed by the appellant under Section 19 of the Right to Information Act, 2005 on the ground of arbitrary denial of information by the Chief Public Information Officer (CPIO), the Chief Information Officer has held the information sought by the appellant was rightly\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Central Information Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Central-Information-Commission-1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Central-Information-Commission-1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Central-Information-Commission-1-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Central-Information-Commission-1-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Central-Information-Commission-1-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":277082,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/09\/central-information-commission-cpio-right-to-information-rti-act-second-appeal-legal-news-legal-updates-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":104221,"position":1},"title":"Central Information Commission directs CPIO to disclose information subject to completion of investigation","author":"Editor","date":"November 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Central Information Commission: In the second appeal filed by the appellant under Section 19 of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (\u2018Act\u2019) on the ground of unsatisfactory information furnished by the Chief Public Information Officer (\u2018CPIO\u2019) seeking direction to the CPIO to provide the complete information and take\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Central Information Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Central-Information-Commission-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Central-Information-Commission-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Central-Information-Commission-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Central-Information-Commission-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Central-Information-Commission-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":265614,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/19\/rti-act-cic-information-disclosure\/","url_meta":{"origin":104221,"position":2},"title":"While examining the complaint, can CIC direct disclosure of information under S. 18 of RTI Act? CIC answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 19, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Central Information Commission (CIC): Neeraj Kumar Gupta (Information Commissioner) addressed a matter wherein it was alleged that the respondent intentionally provided an evasive reply by stating that the information sought was not clear, hence issue of prompt response of CPIO was raised. Complainant filed an application under the Right to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":276392,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/31\/competition-commission-of-india-all-india-chess-federation-madras-high-court-right-to-information-act-commission-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":104221,"position":3},"title":"Central Information Commission directs All India Chess Federation to furnish its expenditure in case against Competition Commission of India","author":"Editor","date":"October 31, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Central Information Commission: In the second appeal filed by the appellant under Section 19 of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (\u2018Act\u2019) on the ground of unsatisfactory reply furnished by the Chief Public Information Officer (\u2018CPIO\u2019), the Chief Information Officer, Amita Pandove has directed the CPIO, All India\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Central Information Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Central-Information-Commission-1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Central-Information-Commission-1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Central-Information-Commission-1-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Central-Information-Commission-1-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Central-Information-Commission-1-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273890,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/17\/central-information-commission-second-appeal-section19-right-to-information-act-2005-central-public-information-officer-suresh-deep-polytechnic-all-india-council-for-technical-education-rti-applicat\/","url_meta":{"origin":104221,"position":4},"title":"RTI on pay scales, gross pay, PF deduction and TDS| Unhappy with CPIO’s response, Central Information Commission allows inspection of records","author":"Editor","date":"September 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Central Information Commission: In a second appeal filed under Section 19 of the Right to Information Act, 2005 on the ground of unsatisfactory reply furnished by the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), the Information Commissioner Amita Pandove, has directed the CPIO and Assistant Director (E-Governance cell), to provide an opportunity\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Central Information Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Central-Information-Commission-1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Central-Information-Commission-1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Central-Information-Commission-1-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Central-Information-Commission-1-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Central-Information-Commission-1-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":242921,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/28\/del-hc-penalty-imposed-on-cpios-for-changing-stands-leading-to-apprehension-of-mala-fides-and-unreasonable-conduct-elaborate-principles-laid-down-for-exercise-of-power-by-cpios\/","url_meta":{"origin":104221,"position":5},"title":"Del HC | Penalty imposed on CPIOs for “changing stands” leading to apprehension of mala fides and unreasonable conduct; Elaborate principles laid down for exercise of power by CPIOs","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 28, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Prathiba M. Singh, J., upheld that order of the Central Information Commission whereby a penalty of Rs 10000 was imposed on the petitioners for changing stands while not providing the information as sought by the applicant under the RTI Act. The instant petition was filed by two\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104221","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=104221"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104221\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=104221"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=104221"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=104221"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}