{"id":103711,"date":"2017-02-04T15:11:22","date_gmt":"2017-02-04T09:41:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=103711"},"modified":"2017-03-01T10:27:11","modified_gmt":"2017-03-01T04:57:11","slug":"websites-cant-be-restrained-from-publishing-non-reportable-judgments","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/04\/websites-cant-be-restrained-from-publishing-non-reportable-judgments\/","title":{"rendered":"Websites can\u2019t be restrained from publishing non-reportable judgments"},"content":{"rendered":"

Gujarat High Court:<\/strong>A\u00a0petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution praying to obtain a suitable writ for restraining the free public exhibition of the judgments and orders of the Court over internet by Google even if the cases are non-reportable. He pleaded that because of publication by the respondents the judgment is exhibited for free in public domain and is therefore, against the classification made by the Court.<\/p>\n

It was also alleged that such an overzealous act of respondents is not just undisciplined and without authority, but also has had an adverse impact on personal and professional life of petitioner. The petitioner was accused in the impugned case that was published. Counsel for respondents simply pleaded that it was neither a proper nor a necessary party in the case as Google, being an automated search engine uses software known as \u2018crawlers\u2019 which would crawl the internet and find sites to add to its index and therefore, they were in no way connected to the publication on internet.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that there are no specific provisions pointed out by the petitioner which have been violated by publication of the impugned judgment and as prayed by petitioner, it would not be covered under the ambit of Article 21 of the Constitution. It was clarified by the Court that reportable or non-reportable is the classification made for the reporting of a judgment in law-reporter and not its publication anywhere else while taking into consideration the important fact that High Court was a court of record. [Dharamraj\u00a0Bhanushankar\u00a0Dave v. State of\u00a0Gujarat, 2015 SCC OnLine Guj 2019<\/a>, decided on 19-01-2017]<\/p>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Gujarat High Court:A\u00a0petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution praying to obtain a suitable writ for restraining the free public <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":42052,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[13681,12141,2889,13701,13691],"class_list":["post-103711","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-21","tag-article-226","tag-google","tag-indiankanoon","tag-non-reportable-judgments"],"yoast_head":"\nWebsites can\u2019t be restrained from publishing non-reportable judgments | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/04\/websites-cant-be-restrained-from-publishing-non-reportable-judgments\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Websites can\u2019t be restrained from publishing non-reportable judgments\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Gujarat High Court:A\u00a0petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution praying to obtain a suitable writ for restraining the free public\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/04\/websites-cant-be-restrained-from-publishing-non-reportable-judgments\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-02-04T09:41:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-01T04:57:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/04\/websites-cant-be-restrained-from-publishing-non-reportable-judgments\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/04\/websites-cant-be-restrained-from-publishing-non-reportable-judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Websites can\u2019t be restrained from publishing non-reportable judgments | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/04\/websites-cant-be-restrained-from-publishing-non-reportable-judgments\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/04\/websites-cant-be-restrained-from-publishing-non-reportable-judgments\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-02-04T09:41:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-01T04:57:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/04\/websites-cant-be-restrained-from-publishing-non-reportable-judgments\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/04\/websites-cant-be-restrained-from-publishing-non-reportable-judgments\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/04\/websites-cant-be-restrained-from-publishing-non-reportable-judgments\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/04\/websites-cant-be-restrained-from-publishing-non-reportable-judgments\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Websites can\u2019t be restrained from publishing non-reportable judgments\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Websites can\u2019t be restrained from publishing non-reportable judgments | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/04\/websites-cant-be-restrained-from-publishing-non-reportable-judgments\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Websites can\u2019t be restrained from publishing non-reportable judgments","og_description":"Gujarat High Court:A\u00a0petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution praying to obtain a suitable writ for restraining the free public","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/04\/websites-cant-be-restrained-from-publishing-non-reportable-judgments\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-02-04T09:41:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-01T04:57:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/04\/websites-cant-be-restrained-from-publishing-non-reportable-judgments\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/04\/websites-cant-be-restrained-from-publishing-non-reportable-judgments\/","name":"Websites can\u2019t be restrained from publishing non-reportable judgments | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/04\/websites-cant-be-restrained-from-publishing-non-reportable-judgments\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/04\/websites-cant-be-restrained-from-publishing-non-reportable-judgments\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg","datePublished":"2017-02-04T09:41:22+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-01T04:57:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/04\/websites-cant-be-restrained-from-publishing-non-reportable-judgments\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/04\/websites-cant-be-restrained-from-publishing-non-reportable-judgments\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/04\/websites-cant-be-restrained-from-publishing-non-reportable-judgments\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/04\/websites-cant-be-restrained-from-publishing-non-reportable-judgments\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Websites can\u2019t be restrained from publishing non-reportable judgments"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":107831,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/20\/even-non-reportable-judgments-can-be-obtained-and-published-on-internet\/","url_meta":{"origin":103711,"position":0},"title":"Even non-reportable judgments can be obtained and published on internet","author":"Saba","date":"February 20, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: The Single Bench of R.M. Chhaya, J. has held that a third-party can obtain a\u00a0copy of even non-reportable judgments, and if such judgment is published online, it would not\u00a0amount to being reported, as the word \u201creportable\u201d used for judgment is in relation to it being\u00a0reported in law\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":207952,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/11\/manipur-hc-remedy-under-article-226-not-allowed-where-matter-involves-disputed-question-of-facts\/","url_meta":{"origin":103711,"position":1},"title":"Manipur HC | Remedy under Article 226 not allowed where matter involves disputed question of facts","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 11, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Manipur High Court:\u00a0The Bench of Ramalingam Sudhakar, J. dismissed a writ petition holding that proper remedy for the petitioners to seek intervention of either the competent court or competent authority of the Government. Petitioner who claimed to be the Maharaja of Manipur pleaded that as per the \"Manipur Merger Agreement\"\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":215280,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/03\/utt-hc-power-conferred-on-the-supreme-court-under-article-142-to-do-complete-justice-not-available-to-high-courts-under-article-226-of-the-constitution\/","url_meta":{"origin":103711,"position":2},"title":"Utt HC | Power conferred on the Supreme Court, under Article 142 to do complete justice, not available to High Courts under Article 226 of the Constitution","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 3, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, CJ and N.S. Dhanik, J. entertained a PIL which sought mandamus to direct the respondents to constitute a Committee for management\/trust of the affairs of the \u2018Purnagiri Temple\u2019; to prepare a list of important temples in terms of the order passed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":223740,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/01\/ker-hc-court-entertains-art-226-petition-for-last-and-final-indulgence-where-alternate-remedy-under-sarfaesi-act-available\/","url_meta":{"origin":103711,"position":3},"title":"Ker HC | Court entertains Art. 226 petition for last and final indulgence where alternate remedy under SARFAESI Act available","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 1, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Raja Vijayaraghavan V., J., disposed of this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner here is the accused in the suit filed under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The petitioner took a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":52951,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/23\/amendment-in-rule-114h-of-income-tax-rules-1962\/","url_meta":{"origin":103711,"position":4},"title":"Amendment in Rule 114H of Income-tax Rules, 1962","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 23, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"The Rule 114H of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 (the Rules) has been amended vide Notification No.48\/2016 [S.O.2151(E)] dated 20th June 2016. In order to provide sufficient time to the reporting Financial Institutions for completing the due diligence procedure in respect of other reportable account referred to in Rule 114H (3)(d)(ii),\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Foreign Legislation"","block_context":{"text":"Foreign Legislation","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/foreign\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/income-tax.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/income-tax.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/income-tax.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/income-tax.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/income-tax.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":223865,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/06\/ker-hc-art-226-petition-against-sarfaesi-recovery-proceedings-entertained-court-gives-peremptory-orders-cannot-be-challenged-in-any-court-or-forum\/","url_meta":{"origin":103711,"position":5},"title":"Ker HC | Art. 226 petition against SARFAESI recovery proceedings entertained; Court gives peremptory orders, cannot be challenged in any Court or Forum","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: C.S. Dias, J. disposed of a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner is the wife of one Senthil Kumar, accused under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The husband of the petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103711","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=103711"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103711\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/42052"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=103711"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=103711"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=103711"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}