{"id":100711,"date":"2017-01-20T13:02:51","date_gmt":"2017-01-20T07:32:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=100711"},"modified":"2017-02-27T23:01:10","modified_gmt":"2017-02-27T17:31:10","slug":"direction-to-remove-lawyer-appearing-for-a-party-at-the-instance-of-opposite-party-can-only-be-passed-if-such-removal-does-not-jeopardize-the-interest-of-the-party-for-whom-lawyer-is-appearing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/20\/direction-to-remove-lawyer-appearing-for-a-party-at-the-instance-of-opposite-party-can-only-be-passed-if-such-removal-does-not-jeopardize-the-interest-of-the-party-for-whom-lawyer-is-appearing\/","title":{"rendered":"Direction to remove lawyer appearing for a party at the instance of opposite party can only be passed if such removal does not jeopardize the interest of the party for whom lawyer is appearing"},"content":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court:<\/strong> While deciding upon the issue that whether the lawyer who is appearing for a party can be removed at the request of the opposite party, the Division Bench of A.M. Shaffique and K.Ramakrishnan, JJ., observed that two major conditions must be satisfied in order to direct the removal of a lawyer appearing for a party, they are namely; that the direction to relinquish the \u2018vakalath\u2019 by the counsel appearing should not jeopardize the interest of the party for whom he appears, and secondly the examination of the Advocate as a witness is indispensable and that the disengagement would not jeopardize the interest of the party for whom he appears.<\/p>\n

In the instant case, the petitioner cited the terms of Rule 6 of the Bar Council of India Rules, and prayed before the Court to prohibit the respondent\u2019s Advocate to appear on behalf of his party for the case because as per Rule 6 if any member thereof is related to the Advocate or comes within the relationships mentioned in the Rule, then such Advocate shall be forbidden to appear on behalf of his party. The petitioner further contended that he intendeds to examine the Advocate of the respondent as a witness.<\/p>\n

Perusing the contentions, the Court observed that the petitioner had not mentioned any list citing the respondent Advocate as a witness, and moreover if the counsel is directed to relinquish the \u2018vakalath\u2019 it will jeopardize the interest of the respondent. [Kabeer v. Nazrin, 2017 SCC OnLine Ker 41<\/a>, \u00a0decided on 05.01.2017]<\/p>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court: While deciding upon the issue that whether the lawyer who is appearing for a party can be removed at <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[13291,6672],"class_list":["post-100711","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-practice-and-procedure","tag-witness"],"yoast_head":"\nDirection to remove lawyer appearing for a party at the instance of opposite party can only be passed if such removal does not jeopardize the interest of the party for whom lawyer is appearing | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/20\/direction-to-remove-lawyer-appearing-for-a-party-at-the-instance-of-opposite-party-can-only-be-passed-if-such-removal-does-not-jeopardize-the-interest-of-the-party-for-whom-lawyer-is-appearing\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Direction to remove lawyer appearing for a party at the instance of opposite party can only be passed if such removal does not jeopardize the interest of the party for whom lawyer is appearing\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court: While deciding upon the issue that whether the lawyer who is appearing for a party can be removed at\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/20\/direction-to-remove-lawyer-appearing-for-a-party-at-the-instance-of-opposite-party-can-only-be-passed-if-such-removal-does-not-jeopardize-the-interest-of-the-party-for-whom-lawyer-is-appearing\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-01-20T07:32:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-27T17:31:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/20\/direction-to-remove-lawyer-appearing-for-a-party-at-the-instance-of-opposite-party-can-only-be-passed-if-such-removal-does-not-jeopardize-the-interest-of-the-party-for-whom-lawyer-is-appearing\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/20\/direction-to-remove-lawyer-appearing-for-a-party-at-the-instance-of-opposite-party-can-only-be-passed-if-such-removal-does-not-jeopardize-the-interest-of-the-party-for-whom-lawyer-is-appearing\/\",\"name\":\"Direction to remove lawyer appearing for a party at the instance of opposite party can only be passed if such removal does not jeopardize the interest of the party for whom lawyer is appearing | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-01-20T07:32:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-27T17:31:10+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/20\/direction-to-remove-lawyer-appearing-for-a-party-at-the-instance-of-opposite-party-can-only-be-passed-if-such-removal-does-not-jeopardize-the-interest-of-the-party-for-whom-lawyer-is-appearing\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/20\/direction-to-remove-lawyer-appearing-for-a-party-at-the-instance-of-opposite-party-can-only-be-passed-if-such-removal-does-not-jeopardize-the-interest-of-the-party-for-whom-lawyer-is-appearing\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/20\/direction-to-remove-lawyer-appearing-for-a-party-at-the-instance-of-opposite-party-can-only-be-passed-if-such-removal-does-not-jeopardize-the-interest-of-the-party-for-whom-lawyer-is-appearing\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Direction to remove lawyer appearing for a party at the instance of opposite party can only be passed if such removal does not jeopardize the interest of the party for whom lawyer is appearing\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Direction to remove lawyer appearing for a party at the instance of opposite party can only be passed if such removal does not jeopardize the interest of the party for whom lawyer is appearing | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/20\/direction-to-remove-lawyer-appearing-for-a-party-at-the-instance-of-opposite-party-can-only-be-passed-if-such-removal-does-not-jeopardize-the-interest-of-the-party-for-whom-lawyer-is-appearing\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Direction to remove lawyer appearing for a party at the instance of opposite party can only be passed if such removal does not jeopardize the interest of the party for whom lawyer is appearing","og_description":"Kerala High Court: While deciding upon the issue that whether the lawyer who is appearing for a party can be removed at","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/20\/direction-to-remove-lawyer-appearing-for-a-party-at-the-instance-of-opposite-party-can-only-be-passed-if-such-removal-does-not-jeopardize-the-interest-of-the-party-for-whom-lawyer-is-appearing\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-01-20T07:32:51+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-27T17:31:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/20\/direction-to-remove-lawyer-appearing-for-a-party-at-the-instance-of-opposite-party-can-only-be-passed-if-such-removal-does-not-jeopardize-the-interest-of-the-party-for-whom-lawyer-is-appearing\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/20\/direction-to-remove-lawyer-appearing-for-a-party-at-the-instance-of-opposite-party-can-only-be-passed-if-such-removal-does-not-jeopardize-the-interest-of-the-party-for-whom-lawyer-is-appearing\/","name":"Direction to remove lawyer appearing for a party at the instance of opposite party can only be passed if such removal does not jeopardize the interest of the party for whom lawyer is appearing | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-01-20T07:32:51+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-27T17:31:10+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/20\/direction-to-remove-lawyer-appearing-for-a-party-at-the-instance-of-opposite-party-can-only-be-passed-if-such-removal-does-not-jeopardize-the-interest-of-the-party-for-whom-lawyer-is-appearing\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/20\/direction-to-remove-lawyer-appearing-for-a-party-at-the-instance-of-opposite-party-can-only-be-passed-if-such-removal-does-not-jeopardize-the-interest-of-the-party-for-whom-lawyer-is-appearing\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/20\/direction-to-remove-lawyer-appearing-for-a-party-at-the-instance-of-opposite-party-can-only-be-passed-if-such-removal-does-not-jeopardize-the-interest-of-the-party-for-whom-lawyer-is-appearing\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Direction to remove lawyer appearing for a party at the instance of opposite party can only be passed if such removal does not jeopardize the interest of the party for whom lawyer is appearing"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":56891,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/16\/an-advocate-cannot-appear-in-person-as-power-of-attorney-holder\/","url_meta":{"origin":100711,"position":0},"title":"An advocate cannot appear in person as power of attorney holder","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 16, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Deciding upon the question as to whether an advocate could be permitted to appear in person as a power of attorney holder in the absence of a vakalat, the Court held that an advocate holds an exalted position as an officer of the court who should not\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":215967,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/20\/pat-hc-review-of-an-order-due-to-change-of-lawyer-liable-to-be-rejected-sets-a-bad-precedent\/","url_meta":{"origin":100711,"position":1},"title":"Pat HC | Review of an order due to change of lawyer liable to be rejected \u2013 sets a bad precedent","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 20, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J. dismissed a review application filed by the petitioner-husband for review of this Court\u2019s order in a matrimonial case (pertaining to restitution of conjugal rights) whereby a direction was given to transfer records of the said case from this Court to the Family Court\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":226906,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/12\/citizenship-amemdment-act-row-3-judge-bench-to-hear-matter-relating-to-up-govts-name-and-shame-hoardings-of-protestors\/","url_meta":{"origin":100711,"position":2},"title":"Citizenship (Amemdment) Act Row| 3-judge bench to hear matter relating to UP Govt’s ‘name and shame’ hoardings of protestors","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 12, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: After the Uttar Pradesh government has knocked the door of Supreme Court, challenging the Allahabad High Court's order regarding the removal of hoardings put up by the state government, with names, addresses and photographs of those who were accused of violence during anti-CAA protests, the Court has referred\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":367275,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/20\/rs-5000-cost-on-party-in-person-filing-defective-writ-petitions-all-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":100711,"position":3},"title":"“Repeatedly facing difficulty with such cases”; Allahabad HC imposes Rs 5,000 Cost on Party in Person for filing defective Writ Petition, refusing Amicus Curaie services","author":"Editor","date":"November 20, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cCourt cannot help such writ petitioner appearing in person on basis of defective writ petition, making prayers contrary to law.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Cost on Party in Person for filing defective Writ Petition","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Cost-on-Party-in-Person-for-filing-defective-Writ-Petition.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Cost-on-Party-in-Person-for-filing-defective-Writ-Petition.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Cost-on-Party-in-Person-for-filing-defective-Writ-Petition.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Cost-on-Party-in-Person-for-filing-defective-Writ-Petition.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268297,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/13\/guilty-of-misrepresentation\/","url_meta":{"origin":100711,"position":4},"title":"Guilty of Misrepresentation","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"June 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Amit Gupta\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-244.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-244.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-244.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-244.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-244.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":34132,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/30\/interaction-of-advocate-appearing-as-party-in-person-may-be-discontinued-for-the-time-being\/","url_meta":{"origin":100711,"position":5},"title":"Interaction of Advocate appearing as party-in-person may be discontinued for the time being","author":"Sucheta","date":"January 30, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court via circular dated 20th January, 2016, notified that the certain guidelines have been issued by the Competent Authority with regard to interaction of the Advocates appearing as party-in-person: \u201cPending decision by the Rules Amendment Committee of Hon'ble Judges, interaction of Advocate appearing as party-in-person may be discontinued for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100711","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=100711"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100711\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=100711"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=100711"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=100711"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}